Same-day discharge is preferred by the majority of the patients undergoing radial PCI.

There is limited data on patient preference for same-day discharge PCI. We contacted 953 patients who had same-day discharge radial PCI between 1998 and 2001 and checked whether they were satisfied with same-day discharge and whether they had any complications within 30 days post-PCI (vascular, repeat angiogram/PCI). Complications and health status were also verified by checking hospital records, our province-wide cath lab database and provincial vital statistics, as well as by contacting the referring doctor. A total of 811 patients responded. Of this total, 88.6% of the patients were satisfied with same-day discharge PCI, and 11.4% were not. Patients were significantly more satisfied with same-day discharge when they did not experience vascular complications (83.4% versus 91.5% satisfied with and without vascular complications at 24 hours, and 74.3% versus 90.9% at 30 days, p < 0.01). Patient preference on same-day discharge was the same regardless of whether they needed a repeat PCI within 30 days (p > 0.05). Patients for whom early discharge was important were significantly more satisfied with same-day discharge (97.9% versus 79.7% when early discharge was not important, p < 0.01). Patients who were reluctant to be discharged on the same day of the procedure were significantly less satisfied compared to those who were not (71.9% vs. 96.4% respectively, p < 0.01). A few patients (8.6%) had difficulty finding transportation home and were significantly less satisfied (70.0% vs. 90.3% when they found transportation easily, p < 0.01). In conclusion, same-day discharge is preferred by the majority of the patients undergoing radial PCI.

Comparison of the radial and femoral approaches in left main PCI: a retrospective study.

Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a safe and effective method of percutaneous revascularization. However, there are no data on the efficacy of the transradial approach in left main (LM) PCI. We studied 80 patients (pts) who underwent LM PCI between February 1994 and January 2002, and compared the radial (27 pts) and femoral (53 pts) approaches. Patients were considered free of restenosis if they were free of angina and had a negative treadmill or nuclear imaging study 6 months post-PCI. Mean follow-up time was 27.4+/-23.0 months. Reason for PCI (stable angina, unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction) and lesion location (ostial, mid, distal) were similar in both groups (p>0.05), whereas mean ejection fraction was higher in the radial group (56.5+/-11.1% versus 49.2+/-14.7%, respectively; p<0.05). Sheath size (7 or 8 French; 44.4% radial versus 77.3% femoral) and amount of heparin used (9,192+/-3,645 IU versus 11,468+/-5,083 IU) were significantly larger in the femoral group (p<0.05), and the use of intra-aortic balloon pump was significantly more frequent (3.7% versus 22.6%). Mean fluoroscopy time (21.3+/-12.8 minutes versus 16.7+/-8.5 minutes), amount of contrast used (227+/-92 ml versus 225+/-85 ml), mean procedural time (67.0+/-27.6 minutes versus 73.4+/-32.7 minutes), procedure success (96.3% versus 98.1%), in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE; 7.4% versus 5.6%) and 6-month MACE (14.8% versus 25.5%) were similar in the 2 groups (p>0.05). However, major vascular complications occurred only in the femoral group (5.7%). Radial LM PCI is as fast and successful as the femoral approach and results in fewer vascular complications.