La atención al parto en diferentes países de la Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (OCDE) / Childbirth care in different countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

El desarrollo científico-tecnológico ha comportado una progresiva medicalización del proceso de embarazo, parto y puerperio y la institucionalización de la atención al parto en los hospitales en la mayoría de países industrializados. Existen diferentes modelos organizativos y de atención al parto y se pueden encontrar diferencias en cuanto a los resultados de esta atención. OBJETIVO: Describir diferentes modelos organizativos y de atención al parto en países seleccionados de la Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (OCDE) e identificar variaciones en la estructura organizativa de los modelos observados. METODOLOGÍA: Búsqueda bibliográfica y cuestionario a informantes clave de diferentes países para identificar los aspectos relevantes sobre financiación de los servicios, lugar en que se presta la atención y distribución de competencias. RESULTADOS: Se describe la organización y el modelo de atención al parto, en el contexto de los sistemas de salud de cada país. Países incluidos: Reino Unido, Australia, Holanda, Irlanda, Francia, España y Canadá. Se presentan indicadores de la OCDE sobre la actividad sanitaria, el comportamiento del sistema de salud y el estado de salud de la población. CONCLUSIONES: Se observan diferentes formas de organizar la atención a la maternidad entre los países seleccionados y se evidencian diferencias en los resultados de la atención. Existen varios tipos de localización para la atención a las mujeres con bajo riesgo obstétrico durante el proceso de maternidad. En los sistemas de salud observados, la atención a las muje-res durante el embarazo se suele realizar en un entorno no hospitalario, mientras que para la atención al parto existen diferentes opciones sobre los tipos de localización y de atención que, en algunos casos, pueden ser elegidos por las mujeres. Los indicadores seleccionados muestran un am-plio rango de resultados entre los países elegidos, y parece conveniente investigar la posible relación de esta variabilidad con el tipo de organiza-ción y de atención durante el proceso de maternidad, así como identificar criterios comunes sobre los aspectos específicos para la atención a las mujeres que no presentan riesgos obstétricos

Scientific and technological advances have entailed an increased influence of medicine in the process of pregnancy, childbirth and post-partum with the institutionalisation this entails for childbirth care in the hospitals of most industrialised countries. Several organisational and childbirth care models are in place and differences can be observed between them with regard to the outcomes of such care. AIM: To describe differing organisational and childbirth care models in the chosen countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and identify variations in the organisational structure of the models observed. METHODOLOGY: To conduct a bibliographical search and questionnaire on key informers from various countries to identify relevant aspects concerning service funding, care settings and distribution of authority in this sphere. RESULTS: A description is given of the organisation and childbirth care model on the context of the health systems of each country. The countries studed are: Australia, Canada, France, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom. OECD indicators are presented on healthcare activity, the operation of the health system and the state of health of thepopulation. CONCLUSIONS: Several forms of organising maternity care have been observed from the countries chosen and differences have been identified in the outcomes of care. There are numerous kinds of settings for providing care to women with a low obstetric risk during the maternity process. In the healthcare systems analysed, care for women during pregnancy is often provided in a non-hospital setting; however, when it comes to childbirth care, several options are available in terms of the setting and care which can even be chosen by women themselves in certain cases. The indicators selected point to a broad range of results among the chosen countries and it would be appropriate to research the possible link between this variation in terms of the kind of organisation and care provided during maternity and, accordingly, to identify common criteria relating to specific aspects in care for women with low obstetric risks

Trends in planned early birth: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe trends and outcomes of planned births. STUDY DESIGN: Data from linked birth and hospital records for 779,521 singleton births at ≥33 weeks' gestation from 2001-2009 were used to determine trends in planned births (prelabor cesarean section and labor inductions). Adverse outcomes were composite indicators of maternal and neonatal morbidity/death. RESULTS: From 2001-2009, there were increases in labor inductions and prelabor cesarean deliveries at <40 weeks' gestation, but no decrease in the stillbirth rate (trend P = .34). By 2009, 14.9% of live births at ≥33 weeks' gestation were prelabor cesarean deliveries before the due date; 11.4% were inductions. As planned births increased, maternal risks shifted, which included a decline in inductions with maternal hypertension from 31.9-23.9%. Earlier birth was contemporaneous with increases (trend P < .001) in neonatal and maternal morbidity rates from 3.0-3.2% and 1.1-1.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Planned birth before the due date is increasing without a contemporaneous reduction of stillbirths.

Development of a maternity hospital classification for use in perinatal research.

We aimed to develop a maternity hospital classification, using stable and easily available criteria, that would have wide application in maternity services research and allow comparison across state, national and international jurisdictions. A classification with 13 obstetric groupings (12 hospital groups and home births) was based on neonatal care capability, urban and rural location, annual average number of births and public/private hospital status. In a case study of early elective birth we demonstrate that neonatal morbidity differs according to the maternity hospital classification, and also that the 13 groups can be collapsed in ways that are pragmatic from a clinical and policy decision-making perspective, and are manageable for analysis.

The development and initiation of the NSW Department of Health interprofessional Fetal welfare Obstetric emergency Neonatal resuscitation Training project.

BACKGROUND: The Fetal Welfare Obstetric emergency Neonatal resuscitation Training (FONT) project was initiated on a background of rising notifications of adverse events in NSW maternity units, the significant proportion of which were related to fetal welfare assessment. AIMS: The aim of the study is to describe the development and introduction of the NSW state-wide interprofessional FONT project. METHODS: Following development and risk assessment, FONT was launched in February 2008. The project consists of an online component and two face-to-face training days to be completed each 3 years; the first day for fetal welfare assessment and the second for obstetric and newborn emergencies. Eight, 2-day training sessions were conducted throughout NSW for FONT trainers. Each trainer underwent pre- and post-testing for changes in knowledge of fetal welfare assessment. The 2005-2008 NSW adverse event report numbers were assessed. RESULTS: From 20 February to 17 April 2008, 240 trainers had been trained in fetal welfare assessment, and by the end of 2008 these trainers had trained 954 clinicians. There were significant improvements in the interpretation and management planning of electronic fetal heart rate patterns following training. Analysis of Severity Assessment Codes 1 and 2 showed no significant trend in the number of notifications for adverse events related to fetal welfare assessment. CONCLUSIONS: In the first 11 months, 25% of the state's maternity practitioners had received training in the first stage of the FONT project. The FONT project has shown short-term improvements in learning and communication skills and in the participants of the project.