Dermal hypersensitivity reaction: a PCR-confirmed pattern of herpetic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Herpetic dermatitis due to herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella zoster virus (VZV) can present with similar clinical and histopathologic features. Further confounding matters, viral cytopathic changes are not always observed in biopsy specimens. Therefore, use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis can play an integral role in the definitive diagnosis of herpetic dermatitis and in the distinction of HSV-1/HSV-2 from VZV. METHODS: Forty patients with skin biopsies (2004-2011) had PCR analysis performed to detect HSV-1/2 or VZV. Patient demographics, clinical impression and histopathologic characteristics were reviewed and correlated with PCR findings. RESULTS: Overall, there was complete correlation between clinical impression, histopathology and PCR results in 21 of 40 cases. In 19 cases, clinical impression and histopathology were discrepant and in 15 of these cases PCR confirmed HSV or VZV infection. We also describe 3 cases of herpetic dermatitis without viral change that histopathologically demonstrate the pattern of a dermal hypersensitivity reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that routine use of PCR for definitive diagnosis of herpetic dermatitis should be considered when there is a clinical suspicion of herpes virus infection, even when there is a lack of specific histopathologic findings. Additionally, a dermal hypersensitivity reaction should be recognized as one histopathologic manifestation of herpes incognito.

An audit of dermatopathology requisitions: hand written vs. electronic medical record data entry accuracy.

BACKGROUND: At our institution, dermatopathology case requisitions are received in hand written form or via electronic medical record (EMR). Categories for requisition data entry include patient demographics, physician name and procedure site/date. Systematic data entry problems potentially cause considerable documentation error, propagate inaccurate patient information and potentially delay billing/revenue collection. METHOD: We compared dermatopathology data entry errors on hand written requisitions to data entry errors using the EMR. A total of 11,475 requisitions (8545 hand written and 2930 EMR) were included in the study (the time frame was 4/1/2011-9/30/2011). RESULTS: For hand written requisitions, there were 258 data entry errors on 8545 specimens (3.0%). For requisitions entered via EMR, there were 113 errors on 2930 specimens (3.9%). Container labeling, which is a hand written process with both requisition methods, was the most common source of error. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, even with an EMR, containers are at least partially hand labeled and 96% of EMR errors occurred during this process. Other EMR data entry errors are extremely uncommon (4/2930 cases). This suggests introduction of a labeling process entirely linked to EMR data entry could nearly eliminate data entry errors. Although this study focused solely on dermatopathology cases, the findings can be extrapolated to all types of specimens.

Lupus mastitis: an uncommon complication of systemic or discoid lupus.

Lupus mastitis is an uncommon presentation of lupus erythematosus profundus or lupus panniculitis, a rare variant of lupus erythematosus characterized by inflammation of the subcutaneous fat. Lupus mastitis can present as single or multiple subcutaneous or deep breast masses, often clinically mimicking malignancy. Although lupus mastitis is rare, with less than 25 cases reported, the histologic features are distinct. Awareness of the entity and familiarity with the histologic features allow for accurate diagnosis and appropriate patient management. It most commonly affects women with a mean age at diagnosis of 40 years and an age range of 18 to 70 years. Typical histologic findings in lupus mastitis include a lymphocytic lobular panniculitis with plasma cells and hyaline fat necrosis. The lymphocytic infiltrate can be nodular, diffuse, periductal, and/or perilobular and germinal centers can frequently be identified. Lymphocytic vasculitis is also common. Immunohistochemistry shows a mixed T and B-cell population, with predominantly CD3+ CD4+ T cells intermixed with CD20-positive B cells and polyclonal plasma cells. Most commonly, lupus mastitis is seen in patients with a previous diagnosis of systemic or discoid lupus; however, it can also be the initial presentation of lupus in some patients. We report on 2 cases of lupus mastitis where the clinical impression was to rule out malignancy and review the literature to highlight the key clinicopathologic features.