Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Vaccine ; 34(43): 5170-5174, 2016 10 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27389170

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since the launch of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) in 1988, there has been a tremendous progress in the reduction of cases of poliomyelitis. The world is on the verge of achieving global polio eradication and in May 2013, the 66th World Health Assembly endorsed the Polio Eradication and Endgame Strategic Plan (PEESP) 2013-2018. The plan provides a timeline for the completion of the GPEI by eliminating all paralytic polio due to both wild and vaccine-related polioviruses. METHODS: We reviewed how GPEI supported communicable disease surveillance in seven of the eight countries that were documented as part of World Health Organization African Region best practices documentation. Data from WHO African region was also reviewed to analyze the performance of measles cases based surveillance. RESULTS: All 7 countries (100%) which responded had integrated communicable diseases surveillance core functions with AFP surveillance. The difference is on the number of diseases included based on epidemiology of diseases in a particular country. The results showed that the polio eradication infrastructure has supported and improved the implementation of surveillance of other priority communicable diseases under integrated diseases surveillance and response strategy. CONCLUSION: As we approach polio eradication, polio-eradication initiative staff, financial resources, and infrastructure can be used as one strategy to build IDSR in Africa. As we are now focusing on measles and rubella elimination by the year 2020, other disease-specific programs having similar goals of eradicating and eliminating diseases like malaria, might consider investing in general infectious disease surveillance following the polio example.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Disease Eradication , Epidemiological Monitoring , Global Health , Poliomyelitis/prevention & control , Africa/epidemiology , Humans , Poliomyelitis/epidemiology , Poliovirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , World Health Organization
2.
Pathog Glob Health ; 108(6): 292-7, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25237792

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the reaction of students to adverse events following immunization in order to offer a baseline for developing a communication and risk management plan. METHOD: This is a cross-sectional study conducted in Kinshasa. A survey was conducted between the third and the fourth rounds of Supplementary Immunization Activity. Nine hundred and fifty questionnaires were used and addressed students who attended this university from 1 to 10 June 2011. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were received from 848 students, with 485 females (57·2%), 343 males (40·4%), and 20 unknown (2·4%); 46·9% of students were from the faculty of medicine and 24·7% was from the third graduate degree. From those who completed the questionnaire, 136 (16·4%) reported experiencing an adverse events following immunization. Concerning the attitude of students towards adverse events following immunization, 79 students (58·5%) did nothing; 54 (40·0%) opted for self-medication; 2 (1·5%) went to the hospital. CONCLUSION: The main finding of our study is the low rate of people referring to health-care providers for vaccine-related problems, more specially for adverse events following immunization. A risk management plan should be focused in strategies to increase communication between population and health-care providers.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral/adverse effects , Students/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Democratic Republic of the Congo , Female , Humans , Immunization/adverse effects , Immunization/psychology , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects , Self Medication/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
3.
J Infect ; 48(4): 347-53, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15066337

ABSTRACT

Organising health care was one of the tasks of the International Scientific and Technical Committee during the 1998-1999 outbreak in Durba/Watsa, in the north-eastern province (Province Orientale), Democratic Republic of Congo. With the logistical support of Médecins sans Frontières (MSF), two isolation units were created: one at the Durba Reference Health Centre and the other at the Okimo Hospital in Watsa. Between May 6th, the day the isolation unit was installed and May 19th, 15 patients were admitted to the Durba Health Centre. In only four of them were the diagnosis of Marburg haemorrhagic fever (MHF) confirmed by laboratory examination. Protective equipment was distributed to health care workers and family members caring for patients. Information about MHF, modes of transmission and the use of barrier nursing techniques was provided to health care workers and sterilisation procedures were reviewed. In contrast to Ebola outbreaks, there was little panic among health care workers and the general public in Durba and all health services remained operational.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/methods , Disease Outbreaks , Marburg Virus Disease/prevention & control , Marburgvirus/growth & development , Democratic Republic of the Congo/epidemiology , Humans , Marburg Virus Disease/epidemiology , Patient Isolation/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...