Evaluation of a multicomponent, behaviorally oriented, problem-based "summer school" program for adolescents with diabetes.

A 2-week summer school program, combining problem-based learning with behavior therapy, was developed to help adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes improve their ability to cope with obstacles to dietary management. Ten students participated in a first session, and 9 participated in a second session, serving as a waiting list control group. Outcomes were evaluated pre- and postsession and at a 4-month follow-up using 3-day food diaries, blood glucose data, and paper-and-pencil tests of diabetes-related knowledge, self-efficacy, coping strategies, and general problem solving. Improvements were observed in self-efficacy, problem-solving skills, and self-reported coping strategies. No significant changes were observed in daily intake of fat, cholesterol, calories, mean blood glucose levels or blood glucose variability, and diabetes knowledge. Comparisons between the first group and the waiting list control group do not allow the significant pre-post changes to be clearly attributed to the summer school program.

Traditional vs anchored instruction for diabetes-related nutritional knowledge, skills, and behavior.

This paper describes a nutrition education experiment in which traditional direct instruction was compared with a problem-solving method called anchored instruction (AI). Participants were 69 children ages 9 to 15 years, with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), who attended a diabetes camp. Following pretesting, campers were assigned to AI or direct instruction control classes. Posttests involved evaluating diabetes knowledge, personal meal plan knowledge, ability to choose an appropriate meal from a buffet line, and ability to pack appropriate meals for an overnight campout. AI and direct instruction both produced significant knowledge gains in this study. However, because the scores for the two groups did not differ, this study was unsuccessful in replicating results of other studies or extending the findings to selected measures of actual behavior.

Problem solving anchored instruction about sick days for adolescents with diabetes.

This study's hypotheses were that both shortly after instruction and after an 8-month follow-up, diabetic children taught via anchored instruction (AI), a format for problem solving, would outperform controls. Subjects were 81 9-15-year-old campers with insulin dependent diabetes who were randomly assigned to AI or control groups for two 45-min small group teaching sessions. Als viewed a video about a girl who mismanages her diabetes during intercurrent illness, and they were challenged to identify, define and solve her errors. Controls learned sick-day management via conventional direct instruction. At the end of the 2-week camp, AI and control groups' scores on factual knowledge were equal. AIs were more likely than controls at the end of the camp (0.75 vs. 0.54, P < 0.05) and 8 months later (0.59 vs. 0.38, P < 0.02) to provide a rationale for the use of remembered guidelines. Across all campers, this ability to link guidelines and their rationales was significantly correlated (r = 0.55, P < 0.01) with the number of self-management practices employed by campers who suffered an illness between the end of camp and the 8-month follow-up. Only one long-term behavioral difference between groups emerged: Als' parents shared in making most diabetes decisions on sick days, while controls' parents left more decision making to their children. AI appears at least as good as conventional teaching, and may better 'link' rules and reasons, perhaps aiding daily real-life problem solving.