The effects of body weight status on orthostatic intolerance and predisposition to noncardiac syncope.

Orthostatic intolerance (OI) is frequently the mechanism underlying the occurrence of noncardiac syncope (NCS) and is associated with substantial risk for injury. Body weight status appears to be a modifier of orthostatic responses and possibly influences the propensity to NCS. The majority of cross-sectional studies have found that the lower the body mass index (BMI) the greater the predisposition to OI is, accompanied with both down-regulation of sympathetic nervous system activity and up-regulation of parasympathetic nervous system activity. These changes appear to occur across the whole spectrum of BMI values from underweight to obesity, while they may be associated more strongly with central body fat than total body fat. Weight loss following bariatric surgery has been consistently found to increase OI, attributed first to the effects of weight loss per se, second to the specific type of surgical procedure and third to the potential postoperative autonomic neuropathy due to vitamin deficiency. The increased OI following bariatric surgery renders this intervention not easily tolerable for the affected individuals, mandating increased fluid and salt intake, pharmacological measures or surgical adjustments to attenuate OI. All future studies investigating orthostatic responses and NCS should implement a matching of the population arms for BMI and ideally for body fat.

Long-term metabolic effects of high birth weight: a critical review of the literature.

Recent studies in USA, Europe, and across the world have revealed a continuous increase of mean birth weight in the last 2 decades. Strong evidence exists from several studies indicating that individuals born with a low birth weight are more likely to present cardiometabolic complications in later life. So far, the long-term consequences of high birth weight have not been clearly defined. This review examines the role of high birth weight on the development of cardiometabolic consequences (obesity, body composition, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease) in childhood and adulthood. The majority of the studies show that high BW is associated with an increased risk for obesity. To a certain extent high birth weight affects diseases of the heart and circulatory, but does not constitutes a risk for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the general population. Maternal glycemia and the subsequent fetus hyperinsulinemia appear to be the key component for increased fetal growth. With the increase in incidence of diabetes mellitus and obesity over the years, the number of high birth weight infants is likely to increase. The elucidation of the relationship between high birth weight and the cardiometabolic disorders will be particularly important.

Adiponectin and lipoprotein metabolism.

Adiponectin is secreted by the adipose tissue and it has been shown to be down-regulated in states of insulin resistance and in cardiovascular disease. It has also been found to be correlated with various parameters of lipoprotein metabolism, and in particular, it is associated with the metabolism of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides; adiponectin appears to induce an increase in serum HDL, and conversely, HDL can up-regulate adiponectin levels, and in addition, adiponectin lowers serum triglycerides through enhancement of the catabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Studies investigating whether adiponectin is causally linked with lipoprotein metabolism have yielded conflicting data, and the mechanisms underlying the interplay between adiponectin and lipoproteins remain to be elucidated. The adiponectin-HDL relationship can explain at least in part the presumed protective role of adiponectin in cardiovascular disease and the adiponectin changes observed after dieting, exercise and lipid-lowering treatment. Statins, fibrates, niacin and n-3 fatty acids may influence circulating adiponectin levels, indicating that adiponectin may mediate some of the metabolic effects of these agents. Further studies to investigate more thoroughly the role of adiponectin in lipoprotein metabolism in the human setting should be carefully planned, focusing on causality and the possible impact of adiponectin on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease.

Visfatin levels in prepubertal children born small or large for gestational age.

Children born small (SGA) or large (LGA) for gestational age are prone to develop insulin resistance (IR) during childhood. Visfatin, a hormone with insulin-mimetic actions, has been associated with IR. This study was designed to examine whether serum level of visfatin is correlated with metabolic indices of IR, in prepuberty in association with the intrauterine growth pattern. The following parameters were evaluated at a mean age of 6.5±1.2 years in 155 prepubertal children born appropriate for the gestational age (AGA) (n=63), or SGA (n=42), or LGA (n=50): serum levels of visfatin, adiponectin, leptin, fasting glucose (G(F)) and insulin (I(F)), the homeostasis model assessment IR index (HOMA-IR), plasma lipids, anthropometric indices at birth and the time of evaluation, and obesity indices [waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI) and skinfold thickness]. The mean serum level of visfatin was lower in the SGA than in the AGA and the LGA children (9±5.2 vs. 11.8±5.1 and 12.7±5.6 ng/ml, respectively, p<0.01). Girls had lower visfatin levels than boys (10.4±4.3 ng/ml vs. 12.5±6.7 ng/ml, p<0.05). Visfatin was not correlated with IR indices. In multiple regression analysis visfatin level was positively correlated with birth weight z-score (t=2.56, beta=0.24, p<0.01) and crown to heel z-score (t=2.46, beta=0.22, p=0.014), independent of age, gender, maternal weight before pregnancy, maternal weight gain during pregnancy, BMI z-score, WC z-score, serum leptin and adiponectin, and HOMA-IR. In conclusion serum visfatin level was lower in prepubertal SGA children but not correlated with IR indices. Low birth weight was an independent predictor of visfatin level.

The metabolic role of retinol binding protein 4: an update.

Retinol binding protein 4 (RBP(4)) is regarded as a novel cardiometabolic risk factor, which is secreted mainly by the hepatocytes and also by the adipose tissue. RBP(4) has been shown to induce insulin resistance, and plasma RBP(4) values are increased in type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. Moreover, it has been found that circulating RBP(4) decreases during medical interventions that result in amelioration of the metabolic profile, such as diet, exercise, oral antidiabetic drugs, and hypolipidemic agents. However, only few of the RBP(4)-related studies have investigated whether RBP(4) constitutes a causal factor of the above-mentioned metabolic conditions. Importantly, circulating RBP(4) is influenced by some nonmetabolic conditions, such as renal failure, acute illness, injury, and liver failure. Thus, further studies investigating the metabolic roles of RBP(4) should be carefully planned, taking into account the effects of nonmetabolic conditions on circulating RBP(4).

Obesity, adipose tissue and rheumatoid arthritis: coincidence or more complex relationship?

In the last two decades we have witnessed a boost in scientific interest and knowledge of adipose tissue biology to such an extent that it was promoted to an active endocrine organ. Adipose tissue is not just related to body weight and appetite regulation. It is also implicated in obesity, a low-grade inflammatory state, as well as inflammatory conditions including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an autoimmune disease where anti- and pro-inflammatory cytokine balance is critical. All major adipose derived products, simply termed adipokines, like leptin, adiponectin, visfatin and resistin, reportedly participate in inflammation and immunity. In this review we explore in depth the relationship between adipose tissue and RA, with focus on possible mechanisms, beyond observations about circulating or synovial levels, and special reference to future perspectives and clinical implications.

An overview of the metabolic effects of rimonabant in randomized controlled trials: potential for other cannabinoid 1 receptor blockers in obesity.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Rimonabant, a cannabinoid receptor blocker, has recently been used in clinical practice for weight loss and weight maintenance. Our aim was to review the results of trials of the drug in relation to weight loss and maintenance, and its impact on cardio-metabolic risk factors. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials with rimonabant were selected, through a Medline search, using the terms: rimonabant, endocannabinoid antagonist and obesity. Reports of studies on large numbers of patients and covering the topics related to this review were included. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In all the trials, there was a considerable reduction in body weight in subjects taking 20 mg rimonabant daily varying from 2.6 to 6.3 kg (placebo-subtracted changes). Rimonabant was also associated with haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c) ) reduction. In the Rimonabant in obesity (RIO)-diabetes study, diabetic patients taking metformin or sulphonylureas showed decrease in HbA(1c) levels by 0.5-0.6 ± 0.8% when rimonabant was added, whereas in the Serenade trial patients with untreated diabetes showed a reduction in HbA(1c) of 0.8% vs. 0.3% with placebo. Similar results were obtained in diabetic patients under insulin treatment. The lipidemic profile also improved in patients taking rimonabant 20 mg daily; levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) increased significantly while levels of triglycerides (TRG) decreased in all trials, and positive effects were also observed in patients with atherogenic or untreated dyslipidaemia. In all the RIO studies, prevalence of the metabolic syndrome decreased significantly. In addition, patients treated with 20 mg rimonabant daily exhibited increase in adiponectin. The metabolic changes observed were partly independent of the weight loss and could be attributed to independent peripheral effect of rimonabant. All these beneficial metabolic effects of rimonabant could lead to progress in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, in all the trials the incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation was greater in the rimonabant treated patients than placebo, mainly because of psychiatric disorders (depression and anxiety), nausea and dizziness. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Rimonabant is effective in reducing weight in the obese but may lead to intolerable adverse effects most notably psychiatric effects, which make it unsuitable for routine use. However, the drug provides useful proof of principle for this approach to weight loss. Novel cannabinoid type 1 receptor blockers with selectivity for peripheral receptors, may achieve similar metabolic results with decreased prevalence of psychiatric adverse effects.

Obesity, weight loss and conditional cardiovascular risk factors.

Obesity is a pathological condition aggregating a substantial number of proatherogenic factors, such as insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia and hypertension. In addition to these classic cardiometabolic risk factors, atherosclerosis may be aggravated by other non-classic factors, which are characterized as conditional, including homocysteine, fibrinogen, lipoprotein(a), LDL particle size and high-sensitivity CRP. Some of these biomarkers are disturbed in obesity because of a combination of dietary factors, hypertrophic adipose tissue, low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance and other parameters under investigation. For the reduction of these risk factors, weight loss exceeding 10-20% of the initial body weight is probably necessary, achieved through either conventional lifestyle measures or more drastic interventions such as bariatric surgery. It has been shown that certain well-balanced diets, such as the Mediterranean diet, constitute a means of improving in a concerted manner the levels of CRP, fibrinogen, homocysteine and small dense LDL particles, regardless of weight loss. The significance of considering these factors in weight management intervention is an issue that needs further investigation.

Leptin and adiponectin levels in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. The effect of infliximab treatment.

BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue-derived leptin and adiponectin control hunger, energy expenditure, insulin sensitivity, endothelial function, reproduction and immunity and are thought to play a role in autoimmune diseases. However, their role in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is not clearly defined. Tumour necrosis factor ΤNF-α is a potential modulator of adipocytokines. The effect of longterm anti-TNF-α treatment on plasma levels of leptin and adiponectin has not been assessed so far. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of a 6-month anti-TNF-α treatment on serum leptin and adiponectin levels in AS patients. METHODS: Thirty men with AS were included in the study. Thirty age- and weight-matched men served as controls. Clinical and biochemical parameters were assessed and serum levels of leptin and adiponectin were measured with enzyme immunoassay methods prior to and after the 6-month treatment with infliximab. RESULTS: Mean age and disease duration of AS patients were 40.6±13.7 and 13.4±8.4 years, respectively. At baseline, AS patients exhibited significantly higher adiponectin (15.4±8.3 vs. 8.6±4.2 µg/ml, p<0.05), but no difference in leptin levels (7.2±2.9 vs. 8.9±6.4 ng/ml, p=NS). Adipocytokines did not correlate with any disease parameter. Body weight of the patients did not change significantly over the 6-month period. Serum levels of leptin and adiponectin did not change significantly after the 6-month treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Adiponectin levels were significantly higher in AS patients compared with controls. Infliximab treatment did not change serum levels of leptin and adiponectin suggesting that the anti-TNF-α treatment may not modulate significantly their levels.

Does the presence of metabolic syndome influence weight loss in obese and overweight women?

BACKGROUND: It is known that weight loss is beneficial for obese and overweight subjects with metabolic syndrome. Very few data exist, however, about whether the presence of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance (IR) influence the response of these subjects to weight-reducing interventions. The current study intends to examine whether the presence of metabolic syndrome and its components could influence weight loss in obese and overweight women during a short-term, dietary-based intervention program. METHODS: A total of 107 women aged 49.1 +/- 13.5 years old, with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 25 were studied. The subjects were prescribed a low-fat diet plus weight-reducing drugs when necessary. RESULTS: After 3 months, the subjects with metabolic syndrome lost more weight than those without (6.62% vs. 4.50%; P < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between the percentage of weight loss and the number of the components of metabolic syndrome present at baseline (Spearman rho = 0.329; P < 0.01). Furthermore, patients in the quartile with the highest homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA-index) lost more weight than the remaining subjects (8.17% +/- 3.34 vs. 5.59% +/- 3.87; P < 0.05). These results were significant, even after adjustment for the medical treatment prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: Obese and overweight patients with metabolic syndrome showed a greater reduction of their body weight, compared to the patients without metabolic syndrome. The components of the metabolic syndrome present at baseline correlated positively with the percentage of the weight loss. Finally, the patients with the highest levels of HOMA-index at baseline lost significantly more weight than those with lower levels of this parameter.

The effects of ezetimibe and orlistat, alone or in combination, on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subclasses and HDL-associated enzyme activities in overweight and obese patients with hyperlipidaemia.

BACKGROUND: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) includes discrete subfractions. HDL exhibits anti-atherogenic properties, which have been partly linked to the activity of HDL-associated enzymes, such as the lipoprotein associated phospholipase A(2) (HDL-LpPLA(2)) and paraoxonase-1 (PON1). OBJECTIVE: We assessed in an open-label randomised study the effect of orlistat and ezetimibe, alone or in combination, on plasma HDL subclasses and HDL-associated enzyme activities in overweight and obese subjects (body mass index > 28 kg/m(2)) with hypercholesterolemia [total cholesterol > 200 mg/100 ml (5.2 mmol/l)]. METHODS: Eighty-six people were prescribed a low-fat low-calorie diet and were randomly allocated to receive orlistat 120 mg, three times daily (O group), ezetimibe 10 mg/day (E group) or both (OE group) for 6 months. HDL subfractions were determined using a polyacrylamide gel-tube electrophoresis method. RESULTS: Levels of HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein AI did not change significantly in any group. In group O the cholesterol concentration of HDL-2 subclass increased significantly, while the cholesterol of HDL-3 subclass decreased significantly. In groups E and OE HDL-2 subclass did not significantly change, while the cholesterol concentration of HDL-3 subclass decreased significantly. We observed a non-significant decrease in the HDL-LpPLA(2) and PON1 activity in all groups. However, the ratios of both enzyme activities to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (an index of atherogenicity) significantly increased in all groups. CONCLUSION: Although HDL-C levels did not change after treatment with orlistat and ezetimibe, alone or in combination, there were alterations of the HDL-2 and HDL-3 subclasses. The activity of HDL-LpPLA(2) and PON1 per mg LDL-C increased significantly in all groups.

Effects of sibutramine plus verapamil sustained release/trandolapril combination on blood pressure and metabolic variables in obese hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVE: The management of obese hypertensive subjects may require the administration of anti-obesity and antihypertensive drugs. Sibutramine use has raised concerns regarding a potential increase in subjects' blood pressure and heart rate. The primary end-points of this study were an evaluation of the effect of sibutramine together with a verapamil sustained release/trandolapril combination tablet versus verapamil sustained release/trandolapril alone on the blood pressure and heart rate in obese hypertensive patients. RESEARCH DESIGN/METHODS: Patients received a low-fat low-calorie diet and were randomly allocated to open-label verapamil sustained release/trandolapril 180/2 mg (n = 26) or sibutramine 10 mg together with verapamil sustained release/trandolapril 180/2 mg (n = 28) daily for 6 months. RESULTS: Significant reductions in the subjects' systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were observed in both groups (p < 0.01 versus baseline). At 6 months a greater fall in blood pressure was observed in the sibutramine/verapamil sustained release/trandolapril group compared with the verapamil sustained release/trandolapril group (systolic blood pressure 21.9 +/- 8.1 versus 15.9 +/- 12.3 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure 15.7 +/- 8.1 versus 9.1 +/- 9.9 mmHg) but this was only significant (p = 0.03) for diastolic blood pressure. The subjects' heart rate did not change significantly in any group. No significant sibutramine-associated attenuation of blood pressure reduction was observed during the study. The sibutramine/verapamil sustained release/trandolapril treatment resulted in significantly greater improvement in the subjects' anthropometric variables, homeostasis model assessment and lipid profiles compared with verapamil sustained release/trandolapril administration. The subjects' small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and visfatin plasma levels were only measured in the sibutramine/verapamil sustained release/trandolapril group (all decreased by p < 0.05 versus baseline). CONCLUSIONS: The sibutramine/verapamil sustained release/trandolapril combination in obese hypertensive patients significantly reduced their blood pressure and improved their anthropometric and metabolic variables without affecting the heart rate.

The effect of orlistat and ezetimibe, alone or in combination, on serum LDL and small dense LDL cholesterol levels in overweight and obese patients with hypercholesterolaemia.

BACKGROUND: Increased concentrations of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), as well as of small dense LDL-C (sdLDL-C), are considered as cardiovascular risk factors. OBJECTIVE: An assessment of the effects of ezetimibe and orlistat administration, alone or in combination, on LDL-C and sdLDL-C levels (primary endpoint), as well as on anthropometric variables and metabolic parameters (secondary endpoints) in overweight and obese patients [body mass index (BMI)>28 kg/m(2)] with hypercholesterolaemia [total cholesterol>200 mg/dL (5.2 mmol/L)]. METHODS: Eighty six subjects were prescribed a low-fat low-calorie diet and were randomly allocated to receive orlistat 120 mg, 3 times daily (O group), ezetimibe 10 mg/day (E group) or both (OE group) for 6 months. RESULTS: Significant reductions in LDL-C (-19%, -21%, -32% in groups O, E and OE, respectively, all p<0.01 vs. baseline) and sdLDL-C levels (-45%, -48%, -76% in groups O, E, OE, respectively, all p<0.01 vs. baseline) were observed. Group OE experienced a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C and sdLDL-C levels compared with groups O and E (p<0.05). Furthermore, significant reductions of BMI, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index, serum uric acid, transaminase activities and plasma lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)) activity were observed in the O and OE groups. Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activity and Lp-PLA(2) activity improved significantly more with the combination treatment compared with either orlistat or ezetimibe monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Orlistat and ezetimibe combination had a more favourable effect on LDL-C and sdLDL-C levels in overweight and obese hypercholesterolaemic patients than either drug alone. Furthermore, orlistat, alone or in combination with ezetimibe, additionally improved several anthropometric and metabolic variables.

Effects of a low-calorie diet associated with weight loss on lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) activity in healthy obese women.

INTRODUCTION: Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH or Lp-PLA(2)) is a Ca(2+)-independent phospholipase A(2) primarily associated in plasma with low density lipoproteins (LDL), especially with small dense LDL (sdLDL) particles. Increased plasma Lp-PLA(2) levels have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk in large clinical trials. AIM: To assess the effects of weight loss on Lp-PLA(2) activity and to examine the association of Lp-PLA(2) activity changes with the alterations of sdLDL, the primary carrier of Lp-PLA(2) in plasma. METHODS: Twenty-eight obese, non-diabetic women participated in a weight reduction program. Anthropometric parameters were assessed and parameters of glucose metabolism, lipid profile, Lp-PLA(2) activity, and LDL phenotype (using a 3% polyacrylamide gel-tube electrophoresis method), were determined at baseline and after 4months of weight loss. RESULTS: A 10% diet-induced weight loss resulted in significant improvement in most parameters of lipid and glucose metabolism. Moreover, Lp-PLA(2) activity was significantly reduced (-10.2%, p<0.01). Mean LDL particle diameter did not change after the weight loss program. The cholesterol levels of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and large-buoyant LDL particles were significantly reduced, but neither the cholesterol levels of sdLDL particles nor the % proportion of the sdLDL-cholesterol over the total LDL-cholesterol were changed after the intervention program. Interestingly, the changes in Lp-PLA(2) activity were correlated with the changes of VLDL-cholesterol (r=0.39, p<0.05), but not with the changes of anthropometric or other lipid variables. CONCLUSIONS: A low-calorie diet associated with weight loss in obese women resulted in the significant reduction of the plasma levels of Lp-PLA(2), the potentially new predictor for incident atherosclerotic disease.

Effects of sibutramine and orlistat on mood in obese and overweight subjects: a randomised study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Intentional weight loss results in improvement in mood. Very few data exist regarding the effects of sibutramine on the mood of obese and overweight patients in general clinical samples. Moreover, no study has evaluated the effects of orlistat treatment on mood. The purpose of our study was to assess the effects of sibutramine and orlistat on mood in obese and overweight subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty obese and overweight women were divided into three groups. The first group (n=20) received a low-calorie diet and sibutramine 10mg; the second group (n=20) received a low-calorie diet and orlistat 120 mg three times a day, and the third group received only the low-calorie diet. CONCLUSION: A psychiatric assessment was performed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) before and after 3 months of treatment. In all the groups a statistically significant decrease in HAMD scores was observed. However, the decrease in the sibutramine group was greater compared to that observed in the two other groups (P<0.01). These results suggest that sibutramine treatment may improve mood more than diet alone or orlistat therapy in a general clinical sample of obese patients.

The effects of orlistat and fenofibrate, alone or in combination, on high-density lipoprotein subfractions and pre-beta1-HDL levels in obese patients with metabolic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effect of orlistat and fenofibrate, alone or in combination, on plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subfractions and plasma pre-beta1-HDL levels in overweight and obese subjects with metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS: Patients (n = 89) were prescribed a low-fat low-calorie diet and were randomly allocated to receive orlistat 120 mg three times daily (O group), micronized fenofibrate 200 mg/day (F group) or both (OF group) for 6 months. HDL subfractions were determined using a polyacrylamide gel tube electrophoresis method and pre-beta1-HDL levels using enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay. RESULTS: We observed a significant change of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels only in the F group (+3%, p < 0.05). Large HDL-C levels were significantly increased and small HDL-C levels were significantly reduced with O administration. In F group we observed a significant increase of small HDL-C levels. No significant change of large or small HDL-C levels was observed with combination treatment. We observed a significant increase of pre-beta1-HDL levels in all groups, which was significantly greater in OF group compared with O or F monotherapy. CONCLUSION: OF combination increased the antiatherogenic pre-beta1-HDL levels in overweight and obese patients with MetS. Furthermore, OF combination counterbalanced the reduction of small HDL-C levels observed with orlistat monotherapy.

Increased plasma levels of visfatin/pre-B cell colony-enhancing factor in obese and overweight patients with metabolic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Visfatin [pre-B cell colony- enhancing factor (PBEF)] is a cytokine highly expressed in visceral fat that exhibits insulin-mimetic properties. However, its role in insulin-resistant states, such as in metabolic syndrome (MetS), remains largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible differences of plasma visfatin levels between obese and overweight subjects with and without MetS. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Plasma visfatin concentrations were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 28 overweight and obese [body mass index (BMI)>28 kg/m2] subjects with Mets and 28 age- and sex-matched overweight and obese (BMI>28 kg/m2) individuals without MetS (control group). RESULTS: Patients with MetS exhibited significantly elevated waist circumference (WCR ) values, higher blood pressure readings, higher fasting glucose and triglyceride concentrations as well as lower levels of HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) compared with controls. Total and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations did not differ significantly between the two groups. Plasma visfatin concentrations were significantly higher in subjects with MetS compared with controls [27 (16- 65) ng/ml vs 19 (10-47) ng/ml, p<0.05]. The same results were observed even after adjustment for age, sex and BMI. Plasma visfatin levels were positively correlated with age (r=0.32, p<0.05), WCR (r=0.31, p<0.05), triglyceride (r=0.59, p<0.01) and glucose (r=0.33, p<0.05) levels and were negatively correlated with HDL-C levels (r=-0.38, p<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed similar results. CONCLUSION: Plasma visfatin levels are increased in overweight and obese subjects with MetS compared with those individuals who do not fulfil the criteria for the diagnosis of MetS.

Statin-associated adverse effects beyond muscle and liver toxicity.

Randomized controlled trials with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) have consistently demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Statins are currently the most widely used drugs in many countries. The most important adverse effects are associated with muscle and liver toxicity. However, with increased use and dose of statins and their over-the-counter availability in some countries more cases of other rare side effects may be seen in clinical practice. In the present article we review the literature concerning the statin-related adverse effects other than muscle and liver injury and we provide insight into their clinical relevance and possible underlying mechanisms.

The effect of orlistat and fenofibrate, alone or in combination, on small dense LDL and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in obese patients with metabolic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Increased concentration of small dense LDL cholesterol (sdLDL-C) and activity of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA(2)) are considered as emerging cardiovascular risk factors and are commonly encountered in subjects with metabolic syndrome (MetS). OBJECTIVE: The primary endpoint of this study was the effect of orlistat and fenofibrate, alone or in combination, on Lp-PLA(2) activity and LDL phenotype in overweight and obese patients (body mass index>28 kg/m(2)) with MetS. METHODS: Patients (n=89) were prescribed a low-fat low-calorie diet and were randomly allocated to receive orlistat 120 mg three times daily (O group), micronized fenofibrate 200mg/day (F group) or both (OF group) for 6 months. RESULTS: Significant reductions of sdLDL-C levels were observed in all treatment groups. Groups F and OF experienced a greater reduction in sdLDL-C levels (p<0.05) together with a greater increase in LDL particle diameter (p<0.05) compared with group O. Total plasma Lp-PLA(2) activity significantly decreased in all treatment groups. The reduction of Lp-PLA(2) was more pronounced with OF administration compared with each monotherapy (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Orlistat and fenofibrate exhibited favorable effects on Lp-PLA(2) activity and LDL phenotype in overweight and obese patients with MetS. Importantly, combination treatment had a more favorable effect on these risk factors.