Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Am J Bioeth ; 10(10): 5-8, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20945260

ABSTRACT

At the time of this writing, a widely publicized, waived-consent trial is underway. Sponsored by Northfield Laboratories, Inc. (Evanston, IL) the trial is intended to evaluate the emergency use of PolyHeme®, an oxygen-carrying resuscitative fluid that might prevent deaths from uncontrolled bleeding. The protocol allows patients in hemorrhagic shock to be randomized between PolyHeme® and saline in the field and, still without consent, randomized between PolyHeme® and blood after arrival at an emergency department. The Federal regulations that govern the waiver of consent restrict its applicability to circumstances where proven, satisfactory treatments are unavailable. Blood-the standard treatment for hemorrhagic shock-is not available in ambulances but is available in hospitals. The authors argue that the in-hospital stage of the study fails to meet ethical and regulatory standards.


Subject(s)
Blood Substitutes/administration & dosage , Drug Industry/ethics , Emergency Service, Hospital/ethics , Emergency Treatment/ethics , Ethics Committees, Research , Hemoglobins/administration & dosage , Informed Consent , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/ethics , Ambulances/ethics , Blood Coagulation , Blood Substitutes/adverse effects , Emergency Treatment/methods , Hemoglobins/adverse effects , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Laboratories/ethics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Research Design/standards , Shock, Hemorrhagic/therapy , Sodium Chloride/administration & dosage , Transfusion Reaction , United States
4.
Am J Bioeth ; 6(3): 18-21, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16754441

ABSTRACT

At the time of this writing, a widely publicized, waived-consent trial is underway. Sponsored by Northfield Laboratories, Inc. (Evanston, IL) the trial is intended to evaluate the emergency use of PolyHeme, an oxygen-carrying resuscitative fluid that might prevent deaths from uncontrolled bleeding. The protocol allows patients in hemorrhagic shock to be randomized between PolyHeme and saline in the field and, still without consent, randomized between PolyHeme and blood after arrival at an emergency department. The Federal regulations that govern the waiver of consent restrict its applicability to circumstances where proven, satisfactory treatments are unavailable. Blood-the standard treatment for hemorrhagic shock-is not available in ambulances but is available in hospitals. The authors argue that the in-hospital stage of the study fails to meet ethical and regulatory standards.


Subject(s)
Blood Substitutes/therapeutic use , Emergency Service, Hospital/ethics , Emergency Treatment/ethics , Hemoglobins/therapeutic use , Informed Consent , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/ethics , Blood Substitutes/adverse effects , Blood Transfusion , Emergency Service, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethics Committees, Research , Ethics, Research , Hemoglobins/adverse effects , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Research Design , Shock, Hemorrhagic/therapy , Sodium Chloride/therapeutic use , Solutions/therapeutic use , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
6.
Virtual Mentor ; 4(1)2002 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23269002
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...