The role of flow cytometry in the diagnosis of lymphoma: a critical analysis.

Flow cytometry, now used routinely to aid in the classification of leukemias, is increasingly being evaluated as a rapid technique for determination of surface antigens on the cells teased from lymph nodes and other masses with suspected lymphoma. The present study reviews biopsy specimens from patients examined during a two year period which were sent for flow cytometry with a diagnosis of suspected lymphoma. Sixteen of 25 samples (64 percent) produced cell suspensions of sufficient quantity and quality to be diagnostically helpful. Results showed that in 9/16 (56 percent) the diagnosis of lymphoma or cancer could be suspected by flow cytometry alone, while 4/16 were consistent with the final tissue diagnosis of normal or reactive hyperplasia. Three samples that came from patients who had morphologic evidence of malignant disease on biopsy (two Hodgkin's disease and one large cell lymphoma) had flow cytometry results that were interpreted as normal. Flow cytometry is rapid and appears to be virtually diagnostic of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma when a majority of cells are B cells with an abnormal kappa/lambda ratio (> 4.0 or < 0.25). Nonhematologic malignancy can be suspected if less than 75 percent of the cells show CD45 (common leukocyte antigen). Hodgkin's disease cannot be detected by flow cytometry as it is currently used, and as many as 15 percent (1/6 in this study) of lymphomas may show normal results. It is extremely helpful when the biopsy sample actually contains the cells of interest in large proportion. Loss of architectural relationships in the course of processing specimens for flow cytometry is a major disadvantage when small foci of lymphoma or tumor cells exist together with large amounts of stroma or normal lymphocytes.

Immunological techniques to differentiate lymphoma from other malignancies.

Seven patients, who had lymph nodes or masses examined by both immunoperoxidase staining and flow cytometry, are presented to illustrate the value of each technique including a critical analysis of the current application of these techniques in the pathology laboratory. All seven patients had diagnoses established by immunoperoxidase staining using antibodies directed against: Leukocyte Common Antigen (LCA), Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA), Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE), Leu M1, B4 or chromagrafin and synaptosin. Flow cytometry, which could be more rapidly performed, when sufficient cells could be separated from the node or mass, was diagnostic in two of the seven cases. Flow cytometry failed to show abnormalities in Hodgkin's disease or solid tumors, but it was useful in rapid diagnosis of lymphoma, provided that the sample contained mostly involved tissue. Nodes in which there was a minor infiltration with lymphoma cells could only be detected by immunoperoxidase technique.

Evaluation of apheresis platelet concentrates stored for 5 days in PL 732 bags.

To assess the functional viability of platelets collected by standard apheresis techniques using the Fenwal CS-3000 "closed system" and stored in Fenwal PL 732 plastic bags for 5 days at room temperature with agitation, a number of in vitro parameters (pH, morphology, platelet volume distribution, osmotic recovery, aggregation, and platelet-associated IgG) were examined as a function of storage time. During the first 24 hours of storage, minimal changes were observed in the test parameters with the exception of ADP-induced aggregation (75% decrease [10 uM], 84% decrease [5 microM]). Significant differences were observed between fresh (day 0) and 5-day-old platelet concentrates in all parameters except median platelet volume. These observed changes in in vitro test parameters with storage time are similar to those previously observed for comparably stored random single-donor platelet concentrates. Thus, the "closed-system" PL 732 apheresis platelet concentrates would be expected to be as effective in vivo as random single-donor platelet concentrates, while minimizing recipient exposure to transmissible agents of infectious disease.

Four crossmatch methods to select platelet donors.

We employed four crossmatch techniques to select platelet donors for refractory patients. Forty-four donor-recipient pairs were studied in 32 patients. Analysis of effectiveness of platelet transfusions revealed that only 18 percent of transfusions gave a borderline response; the remainder were either effective or not effective at all. The corrected predictive values of three crossmatch tests were as follows: enzyme-linked immuno-specific assay, 81 percent; platelet immunofluorescence test, 73 percent; and lymphocytotoxicity, 70 percent (p greater than 0.05). The predictive value of these tests did not differ in HLA-matched versus unmatched platelet transfusions. Donor selection by lymphocytotoxicity compatibility did not appear to be useful if donors were selected by either of the other two methods. The fourth test, antiglobulin-modified lymphocytotoxicity, offered no advantage over lymphocytotoxicity. Our data suggest that platelet crossmatching assays are a useful adjunct to the selection process for the platelet donor in addition to ABO, Rh, and HLA matching.