Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Wound Care ; 29(2): 128-135, 2020 Feb 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32058848

ABSTRACT

Mechanical debridement can be considered as an alternative to surgical debridement if surgery is not available, or is considered impractical or too high risk. One form of selective mechanical debridement is ultrasonic-assisted wound (UAW) debridement. As the published evidence on this is limited, a closed international expert meeting was held to review the existing evidence base on it, present preliminary findings of research currently in progress and discuss individual cases selected from the clinical experts' own practice. The panel also explored the potential barriers to the implementation of UAW debridement and how these might be addressed. It concluded there is sufficient evidence that UAW debridement is an effective method of cleansing and debriding almost all hard-to-heal wounds. Patients who are most likely to benefit from it are not medically stable, on anticoagulants, unable to visit a hospital for wound treatment, and/or have wounds with a poor vascular supply or are close to critical structures. The panel also observed that UAW debridement can be used to prepare the wound for negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or as an adjunctive to it. Given the potential to experience pain during the procedure, the panel considered that patients will benefit from topical analgesia. The panel noted that health professionals, patients and visitors must be protected from the aerosolisation associated with UAW, to reduce risk of cross-contamination.


Subject(s)
Debridement/methods , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , Ultrasonic Therapy/methods , Administration, Topical , Amputation, Surgical , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Bacterial Load , Clinical Trials as Topic , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Home Care Services , Humans , Limb Salvage , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Pain, Procedural/prevention & control , Wound Healing
2.
J Wound Care ; 27(7): 444-454, 2018 07 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30016138

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and performance of a gelling fibre dressing, with respect to wound exudate management, maceration and periwound skin conditions. METHOD: Complex (non-healing) surgical or chronic wounds healing by secondary intention were treated with a gelling fibre dressing (Biosorb, Acelity) as part of a prospective, two-centre case series product evaluation study. Dressing performance was evaluated at each change, and weekly for up to four weeks or until the wound healed, if this was in less than four weeks. The main outcome measure was dressing performance, wound bed and periwound skin condition. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients, aged 26-87 years, were enrolled; 10 patients (66.7%) presented with chronic wounds including venous leg ulcers (VLUs), arterial leg ulcer, one mixed leg ulcer, pressure ulcer (PU), and diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The remaining wounds (33.3%) were postsurgical complex wounds healing by secondary intention, located in the upper leg, foot, abdomen, and sacrum. Mean wound area was 22.6±36.6cm2 (range: 1.3-144.0cm2). Treated wounds showed complete granulation in eight (53.0%) wounds, 75% granulation coverage in two (13.3%) wounds, 50% coverage in three (20.3%), and 25% coverage in two (13.3%) wounds. Patients evaluated the dressing effectiveness as 'excellent' or 'very good' in 45% of cases, 'moderate' in 45%, and 'poor' in 10% of cases. Results of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) showed 70% of patients rated their pain as 'low' and 30% as 'moderate' at dressing removal. Clinicians' evaluation of dressing ability to absorb and retain wound exudate was rated 'excellent' or 'very good' in 80% of cases, and moderate in 20% and poor in 10% of cases. Overall, clinicians' impression of the dressing performance was reported as 'excellent' or 'very good' in 80% of cases and 'moderate' in 20% of cases. No patient had to be removed from the study due to adverse events directly related to the dressing or its performance. CONCLUSION: These clinical findings suggest the new gelling fibre dressing to be safe and effective in wound treatment of complex (non-healing) surgical or chronic wounds, to manage exudate effectively, and to optimise the conditions of wounds healing by secondary intention.


Subject(s)
Bandages, Hydrocolloid , Skin Ulcer/therapy , Wound Healing , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Female , Gels , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pressure Ulcer/therapy , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Wales
3.
PLoS One ; 12(1): e0168808, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28056109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The cerebellum integrates proprioceptive, vestibular and visual signals for postural control. Cerebellar patients with downbeat nystagmus (DBN) complain of unsteadiness of stance and gait as well as blurred vision and oscillopsia. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to elucidate the differential role of visual input, gaze eccentricity, vestibular and proprioceptive input on the postural stability in a large cohort of cerebellar patients with DBN, in comparison to healthy age-matched control subjects. METHODS: Oculomotor (nystagmus, smooth pursuit eye movements) and postural (postural sway speed) parameters were recorded and related to each other and volumetric changes of the cerebellum (voxel-based morphometry, SPM). RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients showed larger postural instability in all experimental conditions. Postural sway increased with nystagmus in the eyes closed condition but not with the eyes open. Romberg's ratio remained stable and was not different from healthy controls. Postural sway did not change with gaze position or graviceptive input. It increased with attenuated proprioceptive input and on tandem stance in both groups but Romberg's ratio also did not differ. Cerebellar atrophy (vermal lobule VI, VIII) correlated with the severity of impaired smooth pursuit eye movements of DBN patients. CONCLUSIONS: Postural ataxia of cerebellar patients with DBN cannot be explained by impaired visual feedback. Despite oscillopsia visual feedback control on cerebellar postural control seems to be preserved as postural sway was strongest on visual deprivation. The increase in postural ataxia is neither related to modulations of single components characterizing nystagmus nor to deprivation of single sensory (visual, proprioceptive) inputs usually stabilizing stance. Re-weighting of multisensory signals and/or inappropriate cerebellar motor commands might account for this postural ataxia.


Subject(s)
Cerebellar Ataxia/physiopathology , Cerebellar Diseases/physiopathology , Nystagmus, Pathologic/physiopathology , Posture/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Female , Fixation, Ocular/physiology , Humans , Male , Ocular Motility Disorders/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...