The cancer testis antigens CABYR-a/b and CABYR-c are expressed in a subset of colorectal cancers and hold promise as targets for specific immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Calcium-binding tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated protein (CABYR) is expressed in the human germ line but not in adult human tissues, thus, it is considered a cancer testis protein. The aim of this study is to evaluate the CABYR isoforms: a/b and c mRNA expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) and to determine if these proteins hold promise as vaccine targets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CABYR mRNA expression in a set of normal human tissues, including the testis, were determined and compared using semi-quantitative PCR. As regards the tumor and normal mucosal samples from study patients, RNA was extracted and cDNA generated after which quantitative PCR was carried out. Analysis of CABYR protein expressions by immunohistochemistry in tumor and normal colon tissues was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 47 paired CRC and normal tissue specimens were studied. The percent of patients with a relative expression ratio of malignant to normal (M/N) tissues over 1 was 70% for CABYR a/b and 72% for CABYR c. The percent with both a M/N ratio over 1 and expression levels over 0.1% of testis was 23.4% for CABYR-a/b and 25.5% for CABYR c. CABYR expression in tumors was further confirmed by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: CABYR a/b and c hold promise as specific immunotherapy targets, however, a larger and more diverse group of tumors (Stage 1-4) needs to be assessed and evaluation of blood for anti-CABYR antibodies is needed to pursue this concept.

Association of Surgical Treatment, Systemic Therapy, and Survival in Patients With Abdominal Visceral Melanoma Metastases, 1965-2014: Relevance of Surgical Cure in the Era of Modern Systemic Therapy.

Importance: Systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma has evolved rapidly during the last decade, and patient treatment has become more complex. Objective: To evaluate the survival benefit achieved through surgical resection of melanoma metastatic to the abdominal viscera in patients treated in the modern treatment environment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective review of the institutional melanoma database from the John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence St Johns Health Center, a tertiary-level melanoma referral center, included 1623 patients with melanoma diagnosed as having potentially resectable abdominal metastases before (1969-2003) and after (2004-2014) advances in systemic therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 1623 patients identified in the database with abdominal melanoma metastases, 1097 were men (67.6%), and the mean (SD) age was 54.6 (14.6) years. Of the patients with metastatic melanoma, 1623 (320 [19.7%] in the 2004-2014 period) had abdominal metastases, including 336 (20.7%) with metastases in the gastrointestinal tract, 697 (42.9%) in the liver, 138 (8.5%) in the adrenal glands, 38 (2.3%) in the pancreas, 109 (6.7%) in the spleen, and 305 (18.8%) with multiple sites. Median OS was superior in surgical (n = 392; 18.0 months) vs nonsurgical (n = 1231; 7.0 months) patients (P < .001). The most favorable 1-year and 2-year OS was seen after surgery for gastrointestinal tract (52% and 41%) and liver (51% and 38%) metastases, respectively. Multivariable analysis found increasing age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; P = .02) and the presence of ulceration (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.45; P = .04) were associated with a worse OS. Alternatively, treatment with metastasectomy (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.74; P < .001) and metastases involving the gastrointestinal tract (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87; P = .004) were associated with a better OS. The systemic treatment era did not significantly affect outcomes (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-1.02; P = .15). Overall, patients with gastrointestinal tract metastases undergoing complete, curative resection derived the greatest benefit, with a median OS of 64 months. Conclusions and Relevance: To our knowledge, this series is the largest single-institution experience with abdominal melanoma metastases, demonstrating that surgical resection remains an important treatment consideration even in the systemic treatment era.

Prognostic Utility of Immunoprofiling in Colon Cancer: Results from a Prospective, Multicenter Nodal Ultrastaging Trial.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective data indicate that immunoprofiling of T cell markers can be prognostic in colon cancer. Prospective T cell immunoprofiling of colon cancer has not been well defined for patients whose lymph nodes are ultrastaged. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort was selected from patients enrolled in an ongoing phase II multicenter trial of nodal ultrastaging for colon cancer. Primary tumor specimens from 89 patients were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for the T cells CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+), and FOXP3(+). Lymphocyte populations were quantified with digital image analysis. Results were examined for their association with 5-year disease-free survival along with TNM stage and clinicopathologic variables. RESULTS: Longer disease-free survival was associated with higher CD3(+) counts at the invasive margin (IM) (p = 0.005), higher CD8(+) counts at the tumor center (TC) and IM (p = 0.002), a lower CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio at the TC+IM (p = 0.027), and a higher CD8(+)/FOXP3(+) ratio at the TC+IM (p = 0.020). After multivariable analysis, CD8(+) at the TC+IM (p = 0.002), the CD8(+)/FOXP3(+) ratio at the TC+IM (p = 0.004), and the number of tumor-positive lymph nodes (p = 0.003) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective demonstration of the prognostic utility of immunoprofiling in colon cancer after nodal ultrastaging. Staging based on tumor immunoprofile can augment TNM staging and provide targets for specific immunotherapies.

Evolving Therapeutic Strategies in Mucosal Melanoma Have Not Improved Survival Over Five Decades.

Mucosal melanoma represents a distinct minority of disease sites and portends a worse outcome. The ideal treatment and role of adjuvant therapy remains unknown at this time. We hypothesized that a combination of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies would improve survival in these aggressive melanomas. Our large, prospectively maintained melanoma database was queried for all patients diagnosed with mucosal melanoma. Over the past five decades, 227 patients were treated for mucosal melanoma. There were 82 patients with anorectal, 75 with sinonasal, and 70 with urogenital melanoma. Five-year overall survival and melanoma-specific survival for the entire cohort were 32.8 and 37.5 per cent, respectively, with median overall survival of 38.7 months. One hundred forty-two patients (63.8%) underwent adjuvant therapy and 15 were treated neoadjuvantly (6.6%). There was no survival difference by therapy type or timing, disease site, or decade of diagnosis. There was improved survival in patients undergoing multiple surgeries (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.55, P = 0.0005). Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy had significantly worse survival outcomes (HR 2.49, P = 0.013). Over the past five decades, improvements have not been seen in outcomes for mucosal melanoma. Although multiple surgical interventions portend a better outcome in patients with mucosal melanoma, adjuvant treatment decisions must be individualized.

Adrenalectomy for Metastatic Melanoma: Current Role in the Age of Nonsurgical Treatments.

Surgical resection of metastases to the adrenal gland can improve overall survival of patients with stage IV melanoma, but its relative value with respect to current nonsurgical therapies is unknown. We hypothesized that surgery remains an optimal first-line treatment approach for resectable adrenal metastases. A search of our institution's prospectively collected melanoma database identified stage IV patients treated for adrenal metastases between January 1, 2000, and August 11, 2014. The 91 study patients had a mean age of 60.3 years at diagnosis of adrenal metastasis and 24 had undergone adrenalectomy. Improved survival was associated with an unknown primary lesion, surgical resection, and nonsurgical therapies. Median overall survival from diagnosis of adrenal metastases was 29.2 months with adrenalectomy versus 9.4 months with nonoperative treatment. Adrenalectomy, either as complete metastasectomy or targeted to lesions resistant to systemic therapy, is associated with improved long-term survival in metastatic melanoma.

Overall Survival Is Impacted by Birthplace and Not Extent of Surgery in Asian Americans with Resectable Gastric Cancer.

Survival from gastric cancer in the USA still lags behind Asia. Genetic, environmental, and tumor biology differences, along with extent of surgery have been implicated. Our aim was to evaluate survival outcomes in Asian-American gastric cancer patients undergoing surgical resection by comparing place of birth and clinicopathologic characteristics (including evaluation of 15 lymph nodes).The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried to identify patients treated surgically for gastric cancer with curative intent in the USA (2000-2010). US-born versus foreign-born Asian-American patients were analyzed for survival. Secondary comparison was made to non-Asian patients. Stage IV and non-surgical patients were excluded. Of 10,089 patients identified, 1467 patients were Asian: 271 were born in the USA, and 1196 were born outside the USA. Median survival was 32 months for non-Asians and 29 months for US-born Asians versus 61 months for Asian immigrants (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis of overall survival in Asian patients, only US birthplace, older age, and higher stage yielded a significantly poorer outcome. Asian-American patients have a worse prognosis if born in the USA. Anatomic and surgical differences do not explain this disparity; environmental factors may be responsible.

Attitudes and Perceptions of Surgical Oncology Fellows on ACGME Accreditation and the Complex General Surgical Oncology Certification.

BACKGROUND: With the first qualifying examination administered September 15, 2014, complex general surgical oncology (CGSO) is now a board-certified specialty. We aimed to assess the attitudes and perceptions of current and future surgical oncology fellows regarding the recently instituted Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation. METHODS: A 29-question anonymous survey was distributed to fellows in surgical oncology fellowship programs and applicants interviewing at our fellowship program. RESULTS: There were 110 responses (79 fellows and 31 candidates). The response rate for the first- and second-year fellows was 66 %. Ninety-percent of the respondents were aware that completing an ACGME-accredited fellowship leads to board eligibility in CGSO. However, the majority (80 %) of the respondents stated that their decision to specialize in surgical oncology was not influenced by the ACGME accreditation. The fellows in training were concerned about the cost of the exam (90 %) and expressed anxiety in preparing for another board exam (83 %). However, the majority of the respondents believed that CGSO board certification will be helpful (79 %) in obtaining their future career goals. Interestingly, candidate fellows appeared more focused on a career in general complex surgical oncology (p = 0.004), highlighting the impact that fellowship training may have on organ-specific subspecialization. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the surveyed surgical oncology fellows and candidates believe that obtaining board certification in CGSO is important and will help them pursue their career goals. However, the decision to specialize in surgical oncology does not appear to be motivated by ACGME accreditation or the new board certification.

Metastasectomy for stage IV melanoma.

Metastatic melanoma has an unpredictable natural history but a predictably high mortality. Despite recent advances in systemic therapy, many patients do not respond, or develop resistance to drug therapy. Surgery has consistently shown good outcomes in appropriately selected patients. It is likely to be even more successful in the era of more effective medical treatment. Surgery should remain a strongly considered option for metastatic melanoma.

Endoscopic tattooing to mark distal margin for low anterior rectal and select sigmoid resections.

Obtaining a reliable distal margin during anterior colorectal resection can be difficult. In this study, endoscopic transmural tattoos were placed to mark the distal transection point in patients with distal colorectal neoplasms who undergo bowel resection. In the operating room, before surgery, sigmoidoscopy is performed with a 2-channel scope using CO2 insufflation. Through channel 1, a biopsy forceps, marked 5 cm from its end, is inserted to the tumor's distal edge; in channel 2, a sclerotherapy catheter is placed. The scope is then withdrawn and forceps inserted at the same rate until the mark is seen, next, via the needle catheter, 4 tattoos are placed at that level circumferentially. After rectal mobilization, visible external tattoos guide stapler placement. If no tattoo is seen, sigmoidoscopy is done and the tattoos used to guide stapler placement. In all 27 patients, the tattoos guided stapler placement; tattoos were seen via the abdomen in 26 and the stapler placed as per tattoos in 25. In 2 patients, repeat endoscopy was done and tattoos used to guide or confirm stapler placement. The margin was ≤1 cm from target in 74% while in 22% the margin was 2 to 3.5 cm off target (mean deviation from target margin = 0.33 cm). In conclusion, this method facilitates stapler placement and provides more reliable margins.