ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate growth, tolerance and safety outcomes with use of an extensively hydrolyzed casein-based formula (eHCF) in infants with cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA). Methods: A total of 226 infants (mean ± SD age: 106.5 ± 39.5 days, 52.7% were girls) with CMPA who received eHCF comprising at least half of the daily dietary intake were included. Data on anthropometrics [weight for age (WFA), length for age (LFA) and weight for length (WFL) z-scores] were recorded at baseline (visit 1), while data on infant feeding and stool records, anthropometrics and Infant Feeding and Stool Patterns and Formula Satisfaction Questionnaires were recorded at visit 2 (on Days 15 ± 5) and visit 3 (on Days 30 ± 5). Results: From baseline to visit 2 and visit 3, WFA z-scores (from -0.60 ± 1.13 to -0.54 ± 1.09 at visit 2, and to -0.44 ± 1.05 at visit 3, p < 0.001) and WFL z-scores (from -0.80 ± 1.30 to -0.71 ± 1.22 at visit 2, and to -0.64 ± 1.13 at visit 3, p = 0.002) were significantly increased. At least half of infants never experienced irritability or feeding refusal (55.7%) and spit-up after feeding (50.2%). The majority of mothers were satisfied with the study formula (93.2%), and wished to continue using it (92.2%). Conclusions: In conclusion, eHCF was well-accepted and tolerated by an intended use population of infants ≤ 6 months of age with CMPA and enabled adequate volume consumption and improved growth indices within 30 days of utilization alongside a favorable gastrointestinal tolerance and a high level of parental satisfaction.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A prospective study was carried out to determine the sensitivity and specificity of reflux symptoms and laryngeal findings to diagnose laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) in children with asthma by comparing the results of double probe pH monitorization and to determine the difference between controlled and uncontrolled asthma in terms of GER and LPR coexistence. METHODS: A total of 50 patients (23 girls, mean age 10.8±0.4 years) with mild to moderate persistent asthma were included in this study. The patients were divided in two groups according to the asthma control status as controlled (n=27) vs. uncontrolled asthma (n=23). All patients completed the reflux symptom questionnaire and then they underwent flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy and 24h double probe (pharyngeal and esophageal) pH monitorization. Laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux were defined according to the double probe pH meter results. RESULTS: The prevalences of LPR and GER were 70% and 46% in asthmatic patients, respectively. The reflux symptom score and LPR disease index were not useful to predict LPR or GER. There was no association between asthma control status and LPR and GER. Vocal nodule seems to be a valuable sign to evaluate LPR in asthmatic children. CONCLUSIONS: The reflux symptom score and LPR disease index do not seem reliable to diagnose LPR and GER in children with asthma. The frequency of LPR and GER are independent of asthma control, atopy and long acting beta agonist usage.
