ABSTRACT
The primary aim of this intervention was to assess the feasibility of using call center nurses who are experts in telephone triage to conduct post discharge telephone calls, as part of a quality improvement effort to prevent hospital readmission. Families of patients with bronchiolitis were called between 24 and 48 hours after discharge. The calls conducted by the nurses were efficient (average time was 12 minutes), and their assessments helped to identify gaps in inpatient family education. Overall, the project demonstrated the efficacy in readmission prevention by using nurses who staff a call center to conduct post-hospitalization telephone calls.
Subject(s)
Hospitals, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement , Telecommunications/organization & administration , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Primary Prevention/organization & administration , Program Evaluation , Telemedicine/methods , Telephone/statistics & numerical data , United StatesABSTRACT
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the strength and integrity of a pilot behavioral intervention designed to assist mothers with breast cancer and their children. RESEARCH APPROACH: A single-group analysis of the strength and integrity characteristics of an intervention developed for a pilot research study. SETTING: Homes of study participants in an urban area. PARTICIPANTS: Seven households with a mother and father and one household with a single mother. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Observer-reported checklists, audiorecorded intervention session data, and structured interview data obtained from study participants. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Strength of the intervention included dimensions such as the theoretical foundation, competence of the interventionist, and specificity to the breast cancer experience in the family. Intervention integrity consisted of adherence by the interventionist and participants to the intervention plan. FINDINGS: The strength of the intervention was determined to be an asset. Careful planning had included a framework, a defined set of scripted sessions, a competent interventionist, and content specific to the breast cancer experience. In regard to integrity, the protocol content was delivered as scripted. Improvements in the dosage and purity dimensions were found to be needed. Homework assignments and in-session skill-building approaches with the mothers were refined. CONCLUSIONS: An intervention can be examined carefully for strength and integrity with established criteria to determine improvements needed. INTERPRETATION: A clinical research protocol can be improved through an assessment of an intervention's strength and integrity.
