Development of a Remote Version of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation, and Prehension (GRASSP): Validity and Reliability.

BACKGROUND: The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation, and Prehension (GRASSP V1.0) was developed in 2010 as a 3-domain assessment for upper extremity function after tetraplegia (domains: Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension). A remote version (rGRASSP) was created in response to the growing needs of the field of Telemedicine. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of rGRASSP, establishing concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability. METHODS: Individuals with tetraplegia (n = 61) completed 2 visits: 1 in-person and 1 remote. The first visit was completed in-person to administer the GRASSP, and the second visit was conducted remotely to administer the rGRASSP. The rGRASSP was scored both by the administrator of the rGRASSP (Examiner 1), and a second assessor (Examiner 2) to establish inter-rater reliability. Agreement between the in-person and remote GRASSP evaluations was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman agreement plots. RESULTS: The remote GRASSP demonstrated excellent concurrent validity with the GRASSP (left hand intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = .96, right ICC = .96). Concurrent validity for the domains was excellent for strength (left ICC = .96, right ICC = .95), prehension ability (left ICC = .94, right ICC = .95), and prehension performance (left ICC = .92, right ICC = .93), and moderate for sensibility (left ICC = .59, right ICC = .68). Inter-rater reliability for rGRASSP total score was high (ICC = .99), and remained high for all 4 domains. Bland-Altman plots and limits of agreements support these findings. CONCLUSIONS: The rGRASSP shows strong concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability, providing a psychometrically sound remote assessment for the upper extremity in individuals with tetraplegia.

Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease.

Objective: To provide an overview of clinical assessments and diagnostic tools, self-report measures (SRMs) and data sets used in neurogenic bladder and bowel (NBB) dysfunction and recommendations for their use with persons with spinal cord injury /disease (SCI/D).Methods: Experts in SCI/D conducted literature reviews, compiled a list of NBB related assessments and measures, reviewed their psychometric properties, discussed their use in SCI/D and issued recommendations for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Common Data Elements (CDEs) guidelines.Results: Clinical assessments included 15 objective tests and diagnostic tools for neurogenic bladder and 12 for neurogenic bowel. Following a two-phase evaluation, eight SRMs were selected for final review with the Qualiveen and Short-Form (SF) Qualiveen and the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS) being recommended as supplemental, highly-recommended due to their strong psychometrics and extensive use in SCI/D. Two datasets and other SRM measures were recommended as supplemental.Conclusion: There is no one single measure that can be used to assess NBB dysfunction across all clinical research studies. Clinical and diagnostic tools are here recommended based on specific medical needs of the person with SCI/D. Following the CDE for SCI studies guidelines, we recommend both the SF-Qualiveen for bladder and the NBDS for bowel as relatively short measures with strong psychometrics. Other measures are also recommended. A combination of assessment tools (objective and subjective) to be used jointly across the spectrum of care seems critical to best capture changes related to NBB and develop better treatments.

Trends in Rates of ASIA Impairment Scale Conversion in Traumatic Complete Spinal Cord Injury.

Recent studies of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) report higher conversion rates of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grades, especially for complete injuries. We examined the rate of conversion over time after complete SCI, accounting for demographic and injury characteristics. Subjects were 16 years of age and older with a complete SCI injury between 1995 and 2015, enrolled in the National SCI Database as day-1 admissions. We grouped subjects into 3-year intervals and assessed trends in conversion for the total sample and by tetraplegia (Tetra), high paraplegia (levels T1-9, HPara), and low paraplegia (levels T10-12, LPara).We used logistic regression to identify factors related to conversion such as age, sex, etiology, and level of injury. Of 2036 subjects, 1876 subjects had a follow-up examination between 30 and 730 days post-injury. Average age at injury was 34.2 ± 14.6 years; 79.8% were male, 44.6% Tetra, 35.3% HPara, and 20.1% LPara. There was a strong trend toward increased rates of conversion over time (p < 0.01 for all groups), especially for Tetra (to incomplete from 17.6% in 1995-1997 to 50% in 2013-2015, and to motor incomplete from 9.4% to 28.1%). Conversion rates for Para were less dramatic. There were increased odds of converting to incomplete for year of injury, level of injury (Tetra >LPara >HPara), non-violent etiology, and age (older is better). We found similar factors for conversion to motor incomplete, except sex was significant and etiology was not. Conversion rates from complete to incomplete and motor incomplete injury have been increasing, particularly for persons with tetraplegia. This has implications for acute clinical trials and for prognostication early after SCI.

Overview of the Spinal Cord Injury--Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: The Spinal Cord Injury--Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system was developed to address the shortage of relevant and psychometrically sound patient reported outcome (PRO) measures available for clinical care and research in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. Using a computer adaptive testing (CAT) approach, the SCI-QOL builds on the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) initiative. This initial manuscript introduces the background and development of the SCI-QOL measurement system. Greater detail is presented in the additional manuscripts of this special issue. DESIGN: Classical and contemporary test development methodologies were employed. Qualitative input was obtained from individuals with SCI and clinicians through interviews, focus groups, and cognitive debriefing. Item pools were field tested in a multi-site sample (n=877) and calibrated using item response theory methods. Initial reliability and validity testing was performed in a new sample of individuals with traumatic SCI (n=245). SETTING: Five Model SCI System centers and one Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with traumatic SCI. INTERVENTIONS: n/a OUTCOME MEASURES: n/a RESULTS: The SCI-QOL consists of 19 item banks, including the SCI-Functional Index banks, and 3 fixed-length scales measuring physical, emotional, and social aspects of health-related QOL (HRQOL). CONCLUSION: The SCI-QOL measurement system consists of psychometrically sound measures for individuals with SCI. The manuscripts in this special issue provide evidence of the reliability and initial validity of this measurement system. The SCI-QOL also links to other measures designed for a general medical population.

Systemic and cerebral hemodynamics during cognitive testing.

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive deficits are reported in 10-60% of individuals with SCI, the primary etiology of these deficits is believed to be concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI). We recently documented diminished memory and marginally deficient attention and processing speed in individuals with SCI discordant for hypotension but matched for TBI. METHODS: Twenty-nine individuals participated: 16 non-SCI controls, 6 paraplegic (T2-T10) and 7 tetraplegic (C4-C8). The Stroop test was used to measure cognitive function and transcranial Doppler ultrasound was used to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF) while resting (5 min) and continuously during cognitive testing. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated from three brachial blood pressures and cerebral vascular resistance index was calculated as: CVRi = MAP/CBF. RESULTS: The paraplegia group (54 ± 6) was marginally older than the non-SCI (42 ± 15; p = 0.06) and tetraplegic (42 ± 11; p = 0.09) groups. Compared to non-SCI group, normalized t-score on the Stroop Color (SC) task was significantly lower in the paraplegic group (p < 0.05). In the tetraplegic group, MAP was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the non-SCI and paraplegic groups, and related to SC t-score (r (2) = 0.873; p < 0.01). In the paraplegic group, CBF was reduced (p < 0.05) and CVRi increased (p < 0.05) compared to the non-SCI group, and CVRi was increased compared to the tetraplegic group (p < 0.05). A significant inverse relationship was noted between change in CVRi and SC t-score in the non-SCI group. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic hypotension relates to cognitive performance in persons with tetraplegia; therefore, BP normalization should be considered. The inappropriate cerebral vascular response to cognitive testing and poor test performance should be investigated in persons with paraplegia.

Comparison of 24-hour cardiovascular and autonomic function in paraplegia, tetraplegia, and control groups: implications for cardiovascular risk.

BACKGROUND: Fluctuations in 24-hour cardiovascular hemodynamics, specifically heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP), are thought to reflect autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity. Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) represent a model of ANS dysfunction, which may affect 24-hour hemodynamics and predispose these individuals to increased cardiovascular disease risk. OBJECTIVE: To determine 24-hour cardiovascular and ANS function among individuals with tetraplegia (n=20; TETRA: C4-C8), high paraplegia (n=10; HP: T2-T5), low paraplegia (n=9; LP: T7-T12), and non-SCI controls (n=10). Twenty-four-hour ANS function was assessed by time domain parameters of heart rate variability (HRV); the standard deviation of the 5-minute average R-R intervals (SDANN; milliseconds/ms), and the root-mean square of the standard deviation of the R-R intervals (rMSSD; ms). Subjects wore 24-hour ambulatory monitors to record HR, HRV, and BP. Mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significantly lower 24-hour BP in the tetraplegic group; however, BP did not differ between the HP, LP, and control groups. Mixed ANOVA suggested significantly elevated 24-hour HR in the HP and LP groups compared to the TETRA and control groups (P<0.05); daytime HR was higher in both paraplegic groups compared to the TETRA and control groups (P<0.01) and nighttime HR was significantly elevated in the LP group compared to the TETRA and control groups (P<0.01). Twenty-four-hour SDANN was significantly increased in the HP group compared to the LP and TETRA groups (P<0.05) and rMSSD was significantly lower in the LP compared to the other three groups (P<0.05). Elevated 24-hour HR in persons with paraplegia, in concert with altered HRV dynamics, may impart significant adverse cardiovascular consequences, which are currently unappreciated.