Brick in the wall? Linking quality of debriefing to participant learning in team training of interprofessional students.

Background: The evidence for the conventional wisdom that debriefing quality determines the effectiveness of learning in simulation-based training is lacking. We investigated whether the quality of debriefing in using simulation-based training in team training correlated with the degree of learning of participants. Methods: Forty-two teams of medical and undergraduate nursing students participated in simulation-based training sessions using a two-scenario format with after-action debriefing. Observers rated team performance with an 11-item Teamwork Assessment Scales (TAS) instrument (three subscales, team-based behaviours (5-items), shared mental model (3-items), adaptive communication and response (3-items)). Two independent, blinded raters evaluated video-recorded facilitator team prebriefs and debriefs using the Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) 8-item tool. Descriptive statistics were calculated, t-test comparisons made and multiple linear regression and univariate analysis used to compare OSAD item scores and changes in TAS scores. Results: Statistically significant improvements in all three TAS subscales occurred from scenario 1 to 2. Seven faculty teams taught learners with all scores ≥3.0 (except two) for prebriefs and all scores ≥ 3.5 (except one) for debriefs (OSAD rating 1=done poorly to 5=done well). Linear regression analysis revealed a single statistically significant correlation between debrief engagement and adaptive communication and response score without significance on univariate analysis. Conclusions: Quality of debriefing does not seem to increase the degree of learning in interprofessional education using simulation-based training of prelicensure student teams. Such a finding may be due to the relatively high quality of the prebrief and debrief of the faculty teams involved in the training.

Moving Along: Team Training for Emergency Room Trauma Transfers (T2ERT2).

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether high fidelity simulation-based training (SBT) of interprofessional teams involving trauma transfers has an immediate impact on participants' team-based attitudes and behaviors. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental, pre-/postintervention comparison design examined high fidelity SBT of inter-professional teams using a 2 scenario format with immediate after action structured debriefing. Pre-/postsession Readiness for Inter-Professional Learning Scale (RIPLS, 19 items, Likert-type) surveys as well as Interprofessional Teamwork (IPT, 15 items, Likert-type) questionnaires, and postscenario participant- and observer-rated Teamwork Assessment Scales (TAS, 3 subscales, 11 items, Likert-type) were completed during each training session. Mean RIPLS, IPT, and TAS scores were calculated and matched pre-/postscore differences compared using paired t-test or analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment. SETTING: A large, urban, academic, state health sciences institution in the Southeastern United States during the 2014 to 2015 academic year. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents, emergency medicine residents, and senior undergraduate nursing students comprising ten interprofessional teams. RESULTS: From approximately 48 participants, matched pre-/postsession IPT surveys were available for 42 individuals; 45 had an observer TAS evaluation for both scenarios; and 40 completed TAS peer evaluations for both scenarios. 47 participants had matched RIPLS surveys. Statistically significant improvements in matched pre-/postscore differences occurred for all 15 IPT items. Observer TAS scores significantly improved on 2 of the 3 subscales comparing the second to the first scenario. Peer evaluations statistically improved comparing the second to the first scenario. Two of the 19 RIPLS items demonstrated statistically significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Interprofessional trauma team transfer training using SBT changes attitudes toward key team-based competencies and leads to learning them in the simulated environment. Such improvement in team-based skill and attitudes is an important first step in adopting team-based behaviors in the actual clinical environment and improving transfer care.

Quality with quantity? Evaluating interprofessional faculty prebriefs and debriefs for simulation training using video.

BACKGROUND: High-fidelity simulation-based training is used increasingly for prelicensure student teams. Such sessions rely on faculty who are able to provide quality prebriefing and debriefing to foster learning among participants. We investigated how well faculty conducted prebriefing and debriefing as part of high-fidelity simulation-based training for interprofessional education. METHODS: Two trained observers independently rated 38 video-recorded sessions of combinations of 4 faculty conducting prebriefings and debriefings of prelicensure student teams after high-fidelity simulation-based training. Assessment was undertaken using the Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing, an 8-item tool using a 5-point Likert scale (1 as minimum and 5 as maximum). Mean scores for each item were calculated. Inter-rater agreement was determined using Cohen's kappa. A one-way between-subjects analysis of variance with post-hoc Tukey's studentized range procedure was conducted to compare the effect of team facilitator grouping on the quality of team performance of each Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing element during a prebriefing or a debriefing. Trend analyses of teams with 4 or more observations were performed using Kendall's Tau coefficient test and linear regression analyses to identify whether teams showed improvement through time. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 7 combinations of faculty conducted between 1 to 14 prebriefings or debriefings. In general, faculty combinations performed better during debriefings compared with prebriefings, with only 1 team having 1 mean item score <3.50. Statistically significant differences between faculty combinations in mean item scores was more pronounced during the prebriefings (2 of 3 Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing items rated) than during debriefings (1 of 8 Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing items rated). Effect sizes were strong for all differences. Linear regression analysis revealed a statistically significant change through time for the 3 rated prebriefing items and for 7 of the 8 rated debriefing items. CONCLUSION: Interprofessional faculty combinations in this study tended to have good quality prebriefings and debriefings. The quality of the prebriefings and debriefings can, however, be influenced by the composition of the facilitator teams, most prominently for prebriefings, and team performance does appear to change through time, especially during the debriefing. Future work will focus on whether the quality of prebriefings and debriefings influences learning by trainees.

Examining interprofessional learning perceptions among students in a simulation-based operating room team training experience.

High-fidelity simulation (HFS) operating room (OR) inter-professional team training improves healthcare students' team-based attitudes and behaviours. Such improvements can diminish tribalism among the professions in the OR by overcoming entrenched perceptions of team members. We investigated whether simulation-based interprofessional student OR team training impacts students differently based on their professional background. From 2010 to 2013, HFS OR interprofessional student team training sessions were conducted involving senior medical students, senior undergraduate nursing students, and nurse anaesthesia students. The training involved a two-scenario format, each followed by a structured debriefing focusing on team-based competencies. Before and after each session, students completed a 15-item teamwork competencies self-efficacy survey as well as, from 2012-2013, the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS). At the end of each session, they also completed a 6-item rating scale assessing overall team function during the session. Mean scores were calculated for each student professional group, post/pre mean differences were determined, and student t-test and ANOVA analyses were employed to compare within and between-group differences, respectively. Response rates were over 80% for each scale used. Medical students and undergraduate nursing students had significant improvements in team-based attitudes post- to pre-session. Medical students and nurse anaesthesia students had significant improvements in RIPLS scores. Statistically significant improvements from post- to pre-session were seen overall for both team-based attitudes (effect size = 0.83) and RIPLS (effect size = 0.37). The difference between the team-based scores between professions was significant; RIPLS differences were not. No significant difference existed between professions related to overall teamwork scores. HFS OR team training of healthcare students has beneficial but variable benefits for each professional group.

All for knots: evaluating the effectiveness of a proficiency-driven, simulation-based knot tying and suturing curriculum for medical students during their third-year surgery clerkship.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effectiveness of implementing a proficiency-driven, simulation-based knot tying and suturing curriculum for medical students during their 3rd-year surgery clerkship. METHODS: Medical students on the 3rd-year surgical clerkship completed a proficiency-driven, simulation-based knot tying and suturing curriculum consisting of 6 tasks. The effectiveness was evaluated by comparing the initial presession scores to the final postsession scores on an 8-item self-efficacy scale and evaluating pass rates on end of clerkship skills testing. A paired t test was used to analyze data. RESULTS: Sixty-five students had matched preintervention and postintervention questionnaires for analysis. Pass rates approached 100% by the 3rd attempt on all tasks. Significant gains on all 8 items of the self-efficacy questionnaire from pretraining to post-training were noted. Timing of the general surgery rotation did not impact results. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a simulation-based training, proficiency-driven knot tying and suturing curriculum for 3rd-year medical students during the surgery clerkship is feasible and effective in improving student self-efficacy and objective proficiency toward performance of the tasks taught.