ABSTRACT
Background: Recently, robot-assisted thoracic surgery has been increasingly performed for mediastinal disease. However, appropriate postoperative analgesic methods have not been evaluated. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients who underwent robot-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal disease at a single university hospital between January 2019 and December 2021. Patients were performed either general anesthesia alone, general anesthesia combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia, or general anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided thoracic block. Patients were divided into three groups [non-block (NB), thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and thoracic paraspinal block (TB)] according to postoperative analgesic methods, and they compared with terms of postoperative pain scores by using numerical rating scale (NRS) at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h. Additionally, rescue supplemental analgesic within 24 h, side effects of anesthesia such as respiratory depression, hypotension, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus and urinary retention, time to ambulation after surgery, and hospital stay after surgery were also compared among the three groups. Results: Data from 169 patients (Group NB: 25, Group TEA: 102, and Group TB: 42) were progressed to the analysis. Postoperative pain scale at 6 and 12 h was significantly lower in Group TEA than NB (1.2±1.6 vs. 2.4±1.8, P<0.01; and 1.2±1.5 vs. 2.2±1.7, P=0.018, respectively). There were no differences in pain scores between Groups TB and TEA at any point. The incidence of patients using rescue analgesics within 24 h was significantly different between groups [Group NB: 15/25 (60%), Group TEA: 30/102 (29.4%), Group TB: 25/42 (59.5%), P=0.01]. For postoperative side effects, only the number of patients complaining of postoperative nausea and vomiting for 24 h after surgery differed significantly between groups [Group NB: 7/25 (28%), Group TEA: 19/102 (18.6%), Group TB: 1/42 (2.4%), P=0.01]. Conclusions: TEA provided better analgesia after robot-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal disease than NB as indicated by lower pain scores and fewer rescue analgesic requirements. However, the frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting was lowest in Group TB of all the groups. Thus, TBs might also provide adequate postoperative analgesia following robot-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal disease.
ABSTRACT
Giant lung bullae are usually seen in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Over time, air trapping leads to severe dyspnea and CO2 accumulation. In severe cases, overinflation and rupture of the bulla can cause secondary life-threatening tension pneumothorax. Since positive pressure ventilation exerts deleterious effects on the bulla, general anesthesia is always challenging in patients with giant bullae. We encountered remarkable intraoperative hypercapnia and decreased tidal volume in a 58-year-old male patient with bilateral bullae who underwent right upper bullectomy, due to overinflation of a bulla located in the upper lobe of the ventilated side. Through this experience, to avoid further overinflation, we devised an original, unique and simple airway management strategy using a standard double lumen tube (DLT), which only requires slightly deeper advancement of the DLT to achieve selective lobar blockade during one lung ventilation (OLV). Following the first case, we used this strategy in a 48-year-old male patient who underwent left giant bullectomy, resulting in successful airway management without overinflation during OLV. We recommend our strategy as an option for successful intraoperative airway management during OLV in select bullectomy patients with bilateral giant bullae.
Subject(s)
Lung Diseases , One-Lung Ventilation , Blister/diagnostic imaging , Blister/surgery , Humans , Lung , Male , Middle Aged , Positive-Pressure RespirationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recently, robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is increasingly applied to lung or mediastinal tumor surgery. However, appropriate methods of postoperative analgesia for RATS have not been studied. METHODS: Patients who underwent RATS at a single university hospital between January, 2017 and March, 2018 were studied retrospectively. Patients were anesthetized with either general anesthesia alone or combined general and thoracic epidural anesthesia. Accordingly, postoperative analgesia was managed with either intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl or thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) with morphine and levobupivacaine. Patients were thus divided into 2 groups (PCA and TEA) according to methods of postoperative analgesia, and analgesic efficacies were compared between the groups with regard to pain scores evaluated on a 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, rescue analgesic requirements within 24 h, side effects of anesthesia and analgesia, including respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea, pruritus, and urinary retention, time to ambulation after surgery, and hospital stay after surgery. RESULTS: Data from 107 patients (76 in Group PCA and 31 in Group TEA) were analyzed. NRS pain scores at 6, 18, and 48 h were significantly less or tended to be less in Group TEA than in Group PCA (1.8±2.0 vs. 2.6±1.8, P=0.045; 1.7±1.5 vs. 2.4±1.8, P=0.047; and 1.9±1.4 vs. 2.5±1.6, P=0.063, respectively). The number of patients who required rescue analgesics within 24 h was significantly less in Group TEA than in Group PCA [4/31 (12%) vs. 32/76 (42%), P=0.004]. The other parameters were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PCA, TEA provided better analgesia after RATS in terms of less pain scores, less rescue analgesic requirements, and similar side effect profiles. TEA with a hydrophilic opioid and local anesthetic seemed an appropriate method of postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing RATS.
