ABSTRACT
The signaling of cells by scaffolds of synthetic molecules that mimic proteins is known to be effective in the regeneration of tissues. Here, we describe peptide amphiphile supramolecular polymers containing two distinct signals and test them in a mouse model of severe spinal cord injury. One signal activates the transmembrane receptor ß1-integrin and a second one activates the basic fibroblast growth factor 2 receptor. By mutating the peptide sequence of the amphiphilic monomers in nonbioactive domains, we intensified the motions of molecules within scaffold fibrils. This resulted in notable differences in vascular growth, axonal regeneration, myelination, survival of motor neurons, reduced gliosis, and functional recovery. We hypothesize that the signaling of cells by ensembles of molecules could be optimized by tuning their internal motions.
Subject(s)
Nanofibers , Peptides , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Spinal Cord Regeneration , Tissue Scaffolds , Animals , Cell Survival , Computer Simulation , Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells/physiology , Humans , Integrin beta1/metabolism , Laminin/chemistry , Laminin/metabolism , Mice , Motor Neurons/physiology , Neovascularization, Physiologic , Neural Stem Cells/physiology , Peptides/chemistry , Peptidomimetics/chemistry , Polymers/chemistry , Protein Conformation, beta-Strand , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2/metabolism , Recovery of Function , Signal Transduction , Surface-Active AgentsABSTRACT
We use the comet assay as part of our genotoxicity screening battery for newly synthesized drug candidates. A dataset of more than 250 tests carried out with 75 drug candidates of various chemical classes was analyzed to elucidate the influence of cytotoxicity and compound precipitation on DNA migration in the comet assay. Using a V79 Chinese hamster cell line, 38 of the compounds were negative and 37 were positive in the comet assay. The reproducibility of test results between repeat experiments was 85%. Data on 72 tests with a negative call in which the compounds were tested up to highly cytotoxic concentrations demonstrated that cytotoxicity, as determined by Trypan blue dye exclusion and occurrence of cells with completely fragmented chromatin, did not lead to false positive test results. The majority (64.2%) of compounds with a positive call induced elevated DNA migration in the absence of excessive cytotoxicity. Compound precipitation was observed in 84 tests. In 88.1% of these cases, the test result at the precipitating concentration did not differ from that found at the highest soluble concentration. Half of the remaining 11.9% of contrary results (most of them weak effects) were not reproducible in the respective repeat experiment, indicating no or only a negligible influence of precipitation on test results. The data indicate that using V79 cells, the comet assay specifically detects genotoxic effects and is not confounded by cytotoxicity or compound precipitation under the conditions used.
Subject(s)
Comet Assay , Mutagens/toxicity , Animals , Cell Line , Cell Survival/drug effects , Chemical Precipitation , Comet Assay/methods , Comet Assay/statistics & numerical data , Cricetinae , DNA/isolation & purification , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
We evaluated the suitability of the alkaline comet assay as a screening test in industrial routine testing of new chemicals. Thirty-six pharmaceutical compounds with unknown genotoxic potential were tested comparatively in the comet assay and micronucleus test (MNT) using V79 Chinese hamster cells. The comparison of results is generally based on at least two independent experiments, each with two replicate cultures at a minimum of three concentrations. We found a high degree of concordance between results of the comet assay and MNT. All compounds with negative MNT results were also negative in the comet assay. All positive compounds in the comet assay were also positive in the MNT. However, 16 of 38 positive MNT results were negative in the comet assay. Some of the contrary findings may be due to aneugenic effects, which are detected in the MNT but not in the comet assay. However, the majority of the contrary results may be a consequence of cytotoxicity, which can induce elevated micronucleus frequencies but may not lead to positive effects in the comet assay. Additional data of 39 compounds tested in the Ames test and the comet assay were compared. Four of these compounds that were Ames positive were also positive in the comet assay. However, the comet assay also detected 16 compounds that were negative in the Ames test. We believe that the comet assay in vitro is a useful, fast screening system in mammalian cells that can be used in a test battery during drug development.
