High Satisfaction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients on Enhanced Discharge Pathway.

BACKGROUND: Recently, there have been several reports of using an enhanced discharge pathway following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). No previous studies have prospectively examined patient satisfaction of patients with AIS using an enhanced discharge pathway. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with an enhanced discharge pathway for PSF and whether patients felt that their length of stay was appropriate. METHODS: Patients with AIS undergoing PSF were prospectively enrolled. At their first postoperative clinic visit, patients were administered a survey regarding their experience. RESULTS: Of the 46 patients enrolled (mean age, 14 y), 1 was discharged on postoperative day (POD) 2, 33 were discharged on POD 3, 9 were discharged on POD 4, and 3 were discharged on POD 5. Eighty (37/46) of patients felt that they were discharged at an appropriate time, whereas 20% (9/46) felt they were discharged too early. Patients who felt they were discharged at an appropriate time (mean, 3.2 d) had a trend toward shorter stays than those who felt they were discharged too early (mean, 3.7 d). Overall patient satisfaction of hospital stay was high with a mean of 9 on a 10-point scale (range, 1 to 10). There was no correlation between length of stay and patient satisfaction (P=0.723). Patients who felt they were discharged early had a significantly higher mean FACES pain scores than those who felt they were discharged about right both as inpatients (mean, 4.8 vs. 3.4; P=0.0319) and at their first postoperative clinic visit (5.4 vs. 2.9; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Eighty percent of patients with AIS who underwent PSF felt that the time of discharge was appropriate with an enhanced discharge pathway. There was no correlation between patient satisfaction and length of stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Intensive care unit versus hospital floor: a comparative study of postoperative management of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were admitted to the intensive care unit until two years ago, at which time we changed our protocol to admit these patients to the general hospital floor following a brief stay in a postanesthesia care unit. This study compared postoperative management on a hospital floor with that in the intensive care unit for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of 124 consecutive patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with spinal fusion from August 2007 to August 2010 was performed. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion surgery. RESULTS: Of 124 patients, sixty-six were managed postoperatively in the intensive care unit and fifty-eight, on the hospital floor. The mean age at the time of surgery was fourteen years. A mean of eleven vertebral levels (range, six to fifteen levels) were fused. No significant difference between the groups was found with respect to the mean age at the time of surgery, mean weight, mean preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles, and mean number of levels fused (p ≥ 0.12). However, the use of analgesic and antianxiety medication, number of postoperative blood tests, days of hospital stay, and number of physical therapy sessions were significantly decreased in the floor group compared with the intensive care unit group (p ≤ 0.05). No patient from the floor group had to be admitted to the intensive care unit. The mean charge was $33,121 for the floor group and $39,252 for the intensive care unit group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Initial postoperative management of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following a posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion surgery on a general hospital floor, rather than in an intensive care unit, was associated with a shorter hospital stay, fewer blood tests, less analgesic and antianxiety medication usage, and fewer physical therapy sessions at this high-volume, academic, tertiary-care children's hospital. In addition to improved patient outcomes, there was a significant decrease of 16% in hospital charges for the group that did not go to the intensive care unit.