A novel classification of intraoperative ulnar nerve instability to aid transposition surgery.

HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare inter- and intraobserver agreement of a novel intraoperative subluxation classification for patients undergoing ulnar nerve surgery at the elbow. We hypothesize there will be strong inter- and intraobserver agreement of the 4-category classification system, and reviewers will have substantial confidence while reviewing the classification system. METHODS: Four blinded fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons reviewed 25 videos in total on 2 separate viewings, 21 days apart. Variables collected were ulnar subluxation classification (A, B, C, or D) and a confidence metric. Subsequent to primary data collection, classification grading was stratified into A/B or C/D subgroups for further analysis. Cohen κ scores were used to evaluate all variables collected in this study. The interpretation of κ scores included ≤0.0 as no agreement, 0.01-0.20 as none to slight, 0.21-0.40 as fair, 0.41-0.60 as moderate, 0.61-0.80 as substantial, and 0.81-1.0 as almost perfect agreement. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement of subluxation classification as a 4-category scale demonstrated a moderate agreement on first viewing, second viewing, and when both viewings were combined (κ = 0.51, 0.51, and 0.51 respectively). Seventy-five percent (3 of 4) of reviewers had moderate intraobserver agreement for ulnar nerve subluxation classification, whereas 1 reviewer had substantial intraobserver classification (κ = 0.72). Overall, there was high confidence in 65% of classification scores in the second round of viewing, which improved from 58% in the first viewing round. When ulnar subluxation classification selections were regrouped into classes A/B or C/D, 100% of reviewers had substantial interobserver (κ = 0.74-0.75) and substantial to almost perfect intraobserver (κ = 0.71-0.91) agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The 4-category classification was reproducible within and between reviewers. Agreement appeared to increase when simplifying the classification to 2 categories, which may provide guidance to surgical decision making. The validation of a reproducible classification scheme for intraoperative ulnar subluxation may aid with decision making and further postoperative outcomes research.

Proximity of the Ulnar Neurovascular Structures in Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the proximity of the ulnar neurovascular structures to the endoscopic blade during endoscopic carpal tunnel release (CTR). METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaver hands were used to perform endoscopic CTR using devices from two manufacturers. The skin was excised from the palm, and the endoscopic carpal tunnel blade was deployed at the distal edge of the transverse carpal ligament (TCL). The blade's proximity to the ulnar neurovascular bundle, deep ulnar motor branch, superficial palmar arch, and median nerve was recorded. Following release of the TCL, the device was turned ulnar to the maximal extent to determine if direct injury to the ulnar neurovascular bundle was possible. RESULTS: The average longitudinal distance from the end of the TCL to the superficial palmar arch was 13.3 mm (range, 8.4-20.9) and to the ulnar motor branch was 10.8 mm (range, 4.0-15.0). The average transverse distance from the end of the TCL to the ulnar neurovascular bundle was 5.9 mm (range, 3.1-7.8) and to the median nerve was 3.3 mm (range, 0-6.5). In two of our specimens, the median nerve subluxated volarly over the cutting device. When placing the blade at the distal edge of the TCL, injury to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve, ulnar neurovascular bundle, or superficial palmar arch was not possible in any specimens using the tested devices, even when turning the blade directly toward these structures. CONCLUSIONS: There is a low likelihood of direct injury to the ulnar neurovascular bundle during endoscopic CTR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results suggest that injury to the ulnar neurovascular bundle is unlikely during endoscopic CTR if the distal aspect of the transverse carpal ligament can be clearly identified prior to release. Control of the median nerve is also important to prevent subluxation over the cutting device.

Anatomic Relationship of Hand Intrinsic Tendons at the Metacarpal Head as It Relates to the Diagnosis of Saddle Syndrome: A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this cadaveric study was to investigate the intrinsic anatomy surrounding the metacarpal head and the relationship between the interosseous-lumbrical junction (ILJ) and transverse metacarpal ligament (TML) as it pertains to saddle deformity-posttraumatic adhesions at the ILJ that cause impingement during intrinsic activation. METHODS: Ten fresh frozen cadaveric arms underwent dissections, identifying the intrinsic musculature within the second through fourth webspaces. The TML and ILJ, or "true tendon," were identified. A separate area of nontendinous fibrous tissue identified proximal to the ILJ was referred to as "pseudotendon." Measurements were made within each webspace to identify distances between these structures in full finger extension and intrinsic plus position to assess for changes during simulated motion. RESULTS: The true tendon to TML distance progressively decreased toward the ulnar digits. In the intrinsic plus position, the pseudotendon to TML distance was 0 mm at all webspaces for each specimen. When moving from neutral to intrinsic plus, the true tendon to TML distance decreased the most in the third and fourth webspaces compared with the second, consistent with the trend toward a smaller ILJ to TML gap in the ulnar digits. CONCLUSIONS: There is a fibrous pseudotendinous region proximal to the ILJ that abuts the TML in the intrinsic plus position, which may cause impingement when inflamed in the setting of saddle syndrome. Furthermore, a decreased ILJ to TML gap in the ulnar digits may be related to an increased predilection for saddle deformity in those areas. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results suggest that there is a fibrous region present proximal to the ILJ that may be implicated in the pathology of saddle deformity. Furthermore, decreased distances found between the ILJ and TML in vivo may be an explanation for increased occurrence of saddle syndrome in the third and fourth webspaces in clinical practice.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Clean Hand Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Major and Minor Complications.

Purpose: The indications for prophylactic antibiotics in hand surgery remain undefined. Current literature has focused solely on readmission and reoperation for surgical site infection, while neglecting minor infectious complications treated at outpatient follow-up in addition to complications from antibiotic therapy observed after surgery. This study sought to analyze major and minor infection rates, as well as adverse effects of preoperative antibiotics after clean hand surgery. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted over a 6-month period. The cohorts included patients who received preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and those that did not. Patient details and operative data were obtained during the first postoperative visit following the index surgery. Primary outcomes assessed were as follows: (1) major infection, defined as admission or reoperation for infection; (2) minor infection, defined as use of postoperative oral antibiotics; and (3) complications of antibiotic therapy. Results: A total of 377 consecutive patients underwent operations of the upper extremity. Complications from preoperative antibiotic therapy were seen in 6.9% of patients. Overall, there were no major postoperative infections and the minor postoperative infection rate was 5.6%. The minor infection rate was 6.9% (9/131) among patients who did not receive preoperative antibiotics and 4.9% (12/246) among patients who received preoperative antibiotics (P = .57). Conclusions: A 5.6% minor infection rate was identified following clean hand surgery, with no cases of major infection. Preoperative antibiotics did not demonstrate benefit in terms of reduction of minor infections, but they did yield a 6.9% adverse reaction rate, including one case of Clostridium difficile infection warranting hospitalization. Caution is recommended while prescribing prophylactic antibiotics for clean hand surgeries, given the lack of clear benefits and the potential for adverse effects. Type of Study/level of evidence: Prognostic II.

Anterior Interosseous Nerve to Ulnar Nerve Transfers: A Systematic Review.

Background There has been an increasing utilization of end-to-end (ETE) and reverse "supercharged" end-to-side (SETS) anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to ulnar nerve transfers (NTs) for treatment of high ulnar nerve injury. This study aimed to review the potential indications for, and outcomes of, ETE and SETS AIN-ulnar NT. Methods A literature review was performed, and 10 articles with 156 patients who had sufficient follow-up to evaluate functional outcomes were included. English studies were included if they reported the outcome of patients with ulnar nerve injuries treated with AIN to ulnar motor NT. Outcomes were analyzed based on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores, grip and key pinch strength, and interosseous Medical Research Council-graded motor strength. Comparisons were made using the independent t -test and the chi-square test. No nerve graft control group was required for eligibility. Ulnar nerve injury types varied. Results NT resulted in 77% of patients achieving M3+ recovery, 53.7 ± 19.8 lb grip strength recovery, 61 ± 21% key pinch recovery, and a mean DASH score of 33.4 ± 16. In this diverse group, NT resulted in significantly greater M3+ recovery and grip strength recovery measured in pounds than in the nerve graft/conventional treatment group, and ETE repairs had significantly better outcomes compared with SETS repairs for grip strength, key pinch strength, and DASH scores, but heterogeneity limits interpretation. Conclusion ETE and SETS AIN-ulnar NTs produce significant restoration of ulnar nerve motor function for high ulnar nerve injuries. For ulnar nerve transection injuries at or above the elbow, ETE NT results in superior motor recovery compared with nerve grafting/conventional repair. However, further research is needed to determine the best treatment for other types of ulnar nerve injury and the role of SETS NT.

Benzodiazepines and Related Drugs in Orthopaedics.

➤: Benzodiazepines are among the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide and are often used as anxiolytics, hypnotics, anticonvulsants, and muscle relaxants. ➤: The risk of dependence on and abuse of these medications has recently gained more attention in light of the current opioid epidemic. ➤: Benzodiazepines can increase the risk of prolonged opioid use and abuse. ➤: Given the prevalence of the use of benzodiazepines and related drugs, orthopaedic patients are often prescribed these medications. ➤: Orthopaedic surgeons need to be aware of the prevalence of benzodiazepine and related drug prescriptions in the general population, their current uses in orthopaedic surgery, and the risks and adverse effects of their use.

Isolated Nerve Palsy of the Flexor Pollicis Longus After a Radial Shaft Fracture: A Case Report.

We present the case of a patient who developed an isolated palsy of the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) branch of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) following a fracture of the right radial shaft. The diagnosis of AIN palsy in this setting is rare, especially involving partial neuropathies of only the FPL branch. Clinical presentation in this scenario can be mistaken for other musculoskeletal pathology, and electrodiagnostic studies can be helpful in confirming the diagnosis.

Surgical Outcomes Following Fixation of Peri-Implant Distal Radius Fractures: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes following fixation of peri-implant distal radius fractures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of peri-implant distal radius fractures treated surgically at a large academic practice over 18 years. Patients were included if they had previously undergone open reduction and internal fixation of a distal radius fracture; subsequently sustained a fracture at, or adjacent to, the existing hardware; and then undergone revision fixation with the removal of hardware. Fractures were categorized into 3 groups: type A (distal to the implant), type B (at the level of the implant), and type C (proximal to the implant). Outcomes, including range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores, and radiographic alignment, were recorded at the latest follow-up visit. RESULTS: Twelve peri-implant distal radius fractures that had undergone revision surgical fixation were identified. At the time of injury, the average patient age was 63 years. Ten occurred around a volar plate, 1 occurred around an intramedullary device, and 1 occurred around a dorsal plate. One fracture occurred proximal to previous hardware (type C), 9 fractures occurred at the level of previous hardware (type B), and 2 fractures occurred distal to previous hardware (type A). The median time from initial fixation to peri-implant fracture was 2.7 years. At a mean follow-up of 6 months after the removal of the hardware and revision fixation, radiographic alignment was within acceptable parameters for all injuries. At the final follow-up, the average wrist motion for flexion, extension, supination, and pronation were 66°, 66°, 83°, and 86°, respectively. The average DASH score was 6.7. Three patients experienced complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although peri-implant fractures are infrequent complications following distal radius fracture internal fixation, outcomes of surgically treated peri-implant distal radius fractures are satisfactory with respect to radiographic alignment, range of motion, and function. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Reliability of Routine Radiographs for Conservatively Treated Metacarpal Shaft and Neck Fractures.

Background: To investigate the reliability of orthopedic hand surgeons to evaluate radiographic healing in initial and follow-up radiographs of the conservatively treated metacarpal shaft and neck fractures. The rationale for this study was to reduce the rate of unnecessary, routine radiographs when treating metacarpal fractures. Methods: Forty sets of digital x-rays, twenty at the initial visit and twenty at the 4-week follow-up, were randomly selected and reviewed. Three hand surgeons evaluated the x-rays for (1) fracture location, (2) radiograph timing, (3) healing status, (4) percentage healed, (5) angulation, and (6) confidence in healing status. Observers reviewed studies in random order and evaluated the same set of radiographs one month after the initial review. Intra- and interobserver agreements were analyzed using Fleiss' kappa (κ) for all parameters and all possible observer pairings. Results: Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was highest when evaluating fracture location and lowest when assessing the percentage healed. The interobserver reliability was fair for radiograph timing and healing status and fair-to-moderate for angulation. The intraobserver reliability was moderate for radiograph timing and healing status and moderate-to-substantial for angulation. Observers correctly differentiated initial vs. follow-up images 62% of the time and reported to feel somewhat certain in their evaluation of healing status. Conclusion: When evaluating initial and 4-week follow-up radiographs, hand surgeons were somewhat confident in their assessment of healing but had less than substantial intra- and interobserver reliability following radiographic evaluation. Due to their poor reproducibility, routine radiographs may be unnecessary when evaluating conservatively treated metacarpal fractures. Further studies and guidelines that identify clear indications for the use of routine imaging in metacarpal fracture care are warranted.

Increasing Multidrug Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA Infections of the Hand: A 10-Year Analysis of Risk Factors.

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is the most common pathogen isolated from hand abscesses. The purpose of this study was to understand trends and changes in longitudinal antibiotic resistance profiles and risk factors for these infections to better guide empiric treatment of hand infections. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of culture-positive hand infections over a 10-year period at an urban academic institution from 2005 to 2014. A subset of MRSA hand infections from 2013 to 2014 was then subanalyzed for risk factors for antibiotic resistance for antibiotics with increasing antibiotic resistance during this period. Results: MRSA grew in 46% of hand infections, with a decreasing incidence over the 10-year study period. However, in the same time period clindamycin and levofloxacin resistance increased from 7% to 31% and 12% to 56%, respectively. Risk factors for clindamycin resistance included nosocomial infections and a history of intravenous drug use and hepatitis C. Risk factors for levofloxacin resistance included a history of diabetes and a fever upon initial presentation. Conclusions: The incidence of multidrug resistance remains high, with growing resistance to clindamycin and levofloxacin. There remains a trend for increased clindamycin resistance for patients with history of intravenous drug use and nosocomial infections. Our findings indicate that clindamycin and levofloxacin should be avoided for empiric treatment for hand infections in patients with these risk factors.

MRSA Incidence and Antibiotic Trends in Urban Hand Infections: A 10-Year Longitudinal Study.

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is the most reported pathogen in hand infections at urban medical centers throughout the country. Antibiotic sensitivity trends are not well known. The purposes of this study were to examine and determine the drug resistance trends for MRSA infections of the hand and to provide recommendations for empiric antibiotic treatment based on sensitivity profiles. Methods: A 10-year longitudinal, retrospective chart review was performed on all culture-positive hand infections encountered at a single urban medical center from 2005 to 2014. The proportions of all organisms were calculated for each year and collectively. MRSA infections were additionally subanalyzed for antibiotic sensitivity. Results: A total of 815 culture-positive hand infections were identified. Overall, MRSA grew on culture in 46% of cases. A trend toward decreasing annual MRSA incidence was noted over the 10-year study period. There was a steady increase in polymicrobial infections during the same time. Resistance to clindamycin increased steadily during the 10-year study, starting at 4% in 2008 but growing to 31% by 2014. Similarly, levofloxacin resistance consistently increased throughout the study, reaching its peak at 56% in 2014. Conclusions: The annual incidence of MRSA in hand infections has declined overall but remains the most common pathogen. There has been an alternative increase in the number of polymicrobial infections. MRSA resistance to clindamycin and levofloxacin consistently increased during the study period. Empiric antibiotic therapy for hand infections should not only avoid penicillin and other beta-lactams but should also consider avoiding clindamycin and levofloxacin for empiric treatment.

Forearm Compartment Syndrome: Evaluation and Management.

Compartment syndrome of the forearm is uncommon but can have devastating consequences. Compartment syndrome is a result of osseofascial swelling leading to decreased tissue perfusion and tissue necrosis. There are numerous causes of forearm compartment syndrome and high clinical suspicion must be maintained to avoid permanent disability. The most widely recognized symptoms include pain out of proportion and pain with passive stretch of the wrist and digits. Early diagnosis and decompressive fasciotomy are essential in the treatment of forearm compartment syndrome. Closure of fasciotomy wounds can often be accomplished by primary closure but many patients require additional forms of soft tissue coverage procedures.

Obturator Artery Injury Resulting in Massive Hemorrhage From a Low-Energy Pubic Ramus Fracture.

Pelvic ring fractures are common in the elderly population and are usually a result of low-energy trauma, such as falls from standing. In most cases, low-energy pelvic ring injuries can be treated with appropriate analgesia and early mobilization. Arterial injury resulting in hemodynamic instability from a low-energy pelvic ring injury is rare but, given the poor compliance of vessels in the elderly population, possible. These patients must be carefully monitored after the initial injury. The purpose of this report is to describe an elderly patient who sustained a superior pubic ramus fracture and arterial injury following a low-energy fall from standing that required angiographic intervention. Elderly patients who sustain low-energy or pelvic insufficiency fractures are unlike the younger population with high-energy pelvic fractures and hemodynamic collapse. Elderly patients can have a delayed presentation of arterial injury and require careful physical examination and close monitoring. Additionally, the authors provide a review of the literature for low-energy pelvic fractures. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(3):e546-e548.].