Clinical and pathological analyses of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy cases after kidney transplantation.

AIM: We carried out a clinicopathological analysis of cases presenting with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) after renal transplantation in an attempt to clarify the mechanisms underlying the development and prognostic significance of IF/TA. METHODS: IF/TA was diagnosed in 35 renal allograft biopsy specimens (BS) obtained from 35 renal transplant recipients under follow up at the Department of Transplant Surgery, Kidney Center, Toda Chuo General Hospital, between January 2014 and March 2015. RESULTS: IF/TA was diagnosed at a median of 39.9 months after the transplantation. Among the 35 patients with IF/TA, 19 (54%) had a history of acute rejection. Among the 35 BS showing evidence of IF/TA, the IF/TA was grade I in 25, grade II in 9, and grade III in 1. Arteriosclerosis of the middle-sized arteries was observed in 30 BS (86%). We then classified the 35 BS showing evidence of IF/TA according to their overall histopathological features, as follows; IF/TA alone (6 BS; 17%), IF/TA + medullary ray injury (12 BS; 34%), and IF/TA + rejection (12 BS; 34%). Loss of the renal allograft occurred during the observation period in one of the patients (3%). Of the remaining patients with functioning grafts, deterioration of the renal allograft function after the biopsies occurred in 15 patients (43%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggests that rejection contributes to IF/TA in 30-40% of cases, medullary ray injury in 30-40% of cases, and nonspecific injury in 20% of cases. IF/TA contributes significantly to deterioration of renal allograft function.

[Clinico-pathological investigation of upper urinary tract tumors in patients with normal renal function and in patients with end stage renal disease].

AIMS: To clinically investigate upper urinary tract tumors in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 2003, a study was made of 153 patients who underwent surgical treatment for upper urinary tract tumors in the Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. Of these, 10 had ESRD while 143 had normal renal function. Comparisons were made of the following variables between the two groups: patient's background, clinical findings, surgical procedures, pathological findings, prognosis, depth of tumor cell invasion, tumor grades, postoperative survival rates, cancer-specific survival rates, and complications. RESULTS: Ten ESRD patients with upper urinary tract tumors were comprised of 5 males and 5 females with a median age of 59 (40-71) years and an average hemodialysis period of 71 (0-279) months. Macroscopic hematuria appeared in seven cases (70%) at the onset, and tumors occurred at the renal pelvis in nine cases (90%). As to the T stage, seven cases (70%) were pT2 or more and all 10 cases (100%) exhibited grade 2 or higher in ESRD patients, yielding no significant differences with the cases of normal renal function. In addition, there was no significant difference in both groups with respect to postoperative survival rates and cancer-specific survival rates in cases with curative resection. CONCLUSION: Although upper urinary tract tumors had been considered to exhibit higher grades and stages of malignancy in ESRD cases than in those with normal renal function, the present results showed that the clinico-pathological features are similar in both patients groups. Given that there was no significant difference in postoperative survival rates and cancer-specific survival rates, radical surgery should be also indicated, if possible, for the ESRD patients with upper urinary tract tumors as well as the patients with normal renal function.