Predrawn prehospital medications are microbiologically safe for up to 48 hours.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital medical teams are commonly required to administer a range of medications for urgent stabilisation and treatment. The safe preparation of medications during resuscitation requires attention, time and resources, and can be a source of medication error. In our two road and HEMS (Helicopter Emergency Medical Service) prehospital services, medication errors are mitigated by predrawing commonly used medications to set concentrations daily (Hunter Retrieval Service, HRS) or second-daily (CareFlight Sydney, CFS). However, there are no published data confirming that such practice is microbiologically safe. METHODS: A convenience sample of 299 predrawn medication syringes with syringe dwell times up to 48 hours were collected at the end of their operational deployment. Predrawn medication syringes collected for culture were ketamine, midazolam, fentanyl, thiopentone, rocuronium, suxamethonium, metaraminol and normal saline. The samples were incubated and cultured at a tertiary hospital pathology laboratory using best-practice methodology for non-tissue samples. The samples were collected from June 2017 to February 2018. RESULTS: The mean dwell times ranged from 30.7 hours (fentanyl at HRS) to 48.5 hours (rocuronium at CFS). None of the 299 cultured samples yielded significant micro-organisms. One sample of suxamethonium with a syringe dwell time of 34 hours grew Bacillus cereus but was likely a contaminant introduced during sample collection. CONCLUSION: Predrawing of the eight studied medications for urgent prehospital procedures appears to be a microbiologically safe practice with syringe dwell times up to 48 hours.

Does microbial colonisation of a neck drain predispose to surgical site infection: clean vs clean-contaminated procedures.

PURPOSE: The study was designed to assess the difference in microbiological colonisation and growth that may occur in drains, in the setting of clean-contaminated compared to clean head and neck surgery. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was performed. Surgical drain tips upon removal were sent for bacterial culture and the culture results were compared between clean-contaminated and clean procedures using mixed effects logistic regression. In all statistical analyses, a priori, p < 0.05 (two-tailed) was calculated to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: One hundred and ten drains were examined in both clean-contaminated and clean procedures. Drains from clean-contaminated procedures had a significantly longer time in situ (11 vs 5 days, p < 0.001). Overall, significant evidence was seen for an association between procedure type and drain growth rates: 68% of clean-contaminated procedures; and 45% of clean procedures. Although not statistically significant, there was an increase in normal skin flora contaminated drains in clean-contaminated procedures (41 vs 25%). Rates of pathogenic skin organisms (15 vs 16%) and pathogenic oropharyngeal organisms (2.9 vs 0%) were similar for clean-contaminated vs clean procedure patients. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study demonstrated a higher rate of microbial contamination of neck drains that were placed during procedures that involved continuity with the upper aero-digestive tract and neck. Retrograde migration of skin flora along the drain is common but of no clinical significance. Similar rates of pathogenic microbial growth have been demonstrated thus far. However, selection of nosocomial pathogens due to extended antibiotic prophylaxis may pose a risk for infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b.