Development and validation of a novel score to predict brain death after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Brain death (BD) occurs in 9-24% of successfully resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). To predict BD after OHCA, we developed a novel brain death risk (BDR) score. METHODS: We identified independent predictors of BD after OHCA in a retrospective, single academic center cohort between 2011 and 2021. The BDR score ranges from 0 to 7 points and includes: non-shockable rhythm (1 point), drug overdose as etiology of arrest (1 point), evidence of grey-white differentiation loss or sulcal effacement on head computed tomography (CT) radiology report within 24 hours of arrest (2 points), Full-Outline-Of-UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score of 0 (2 points), FOUR score 1-5 (1 point), and age <45 years (1 point). We internally validated the BDR score using k-fold cross validation (k = 8) and externally validated the score at an independent academic center. The main outcome was BD. RESULTS: The development cohort included 362OHCA patients, of whom 18% (N = 58) experienced BD. Internal validation provided an area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUC) (95% CI) of 0.931 (0.905-0.957). In the validation cohort, 19.8% (N = 17) experienced BD. The AUC (95% CI) was 0.849 (0.765-0.933). In both cohorts, a BDR score >4 was the optimal cut off (sensitivity 0.903 and 0.882, specificity 0.830 and 0.652, in the development and validation cohorts respectively). DISCUSSION: The BDR score identifies those at highest risk for BD after OHCA. Our data suggest that a BDR score >4 is the optimal cut off.

Validation of the rCAST score and comparison to the PCAC and FOUR scores for prognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

AIM: Early, accurate outcome prediction after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is critical for clinical decision-making and resource allocation. We sought to validate the revised post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome for Therapeutic hypothermia (rCAST) score in a United States cohort and compare its prognostic performance to the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category (PCAC) and Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) scores. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective study of OHCA patients admitted between January 2014-August 2022. Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was computed for each score for predicting poor neurologic outcome at discharge and in-hospital mortality. We compared the scores' predictive abilities via Delong's test. RESULTS: Of 505 OHCA patients with all scores available, the medians [IQR] for rCAST, PCAC, and FOUR scores were 9.5 [6.0, 11.5], 4 [3, 4], and 2 [0, 5], respectively. The AUC [95% confidence interval] of the rCAST, PCAC, and FOUR scores for predicting poor neurologic outcome were 0.815 [0.763-0.867], 0.753 [0.697-0.809], and 0.841 [0.796-0.886], respectively. The AUC [95% confidence interval] of the rCAST, PCAC, and FOUR scores for predicting mortality were 0.799 [0.751-0.847], 0.723 [0.673-0.773], and 0.813 [0.770-0.855], respectively. The rCAST score was superior to the PCAC score for predicting mortality (p = 0.017). The FOUR score was superior to the PCAC score for predicting poor neurological outcome (p < 0.001) and mortality (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The rCAST score can reliably predict poor outcome in a United States cohort of OHCA patients regardless of TTM status and outperforms the PCAC score.

Highlighting Diversity in Neuroscience through Course Content.

Slides showcasing research of one or two neuroscientists from diverse backgrounds were added to weekly, learning assistant-led sections in a large (~80 person) primarily lecture course required for neuroscience majors. Students appreciated the slides, and survey data suggests that the slides increased the sense of belonging for both underrepresented and not underrepresented students.