ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sick neonates in TB endemic areas are at risk of nosocomial TB exposure.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes following contact investigation and isoniazid preventive treatment (IPT) in sick neonates exposed to healthcare personnel (HCP) with pulmonary TB.METHODS: Investigations were conducted following two exposure events in different neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Details of the infants´ physical examination, chest X-ray and exposure history were recorded. Infants without TB disease were prescribed a 9-month course of IPT and followed for ≥1 year.RESULTS: Ninety infants were exposed in NICU A and 231 in NICU B (n = 321). The overall proportions of completing the 9-month IPT was 164/265 (61.8%): 40/79 (50.6%) in NICU A and 124/186 (66.7%) in NICU B (P = 0.01). The overall incidence of TB was 10.2% (24/236): 7.5% in NICU A and 11.2% in NICU B (P = 0.39). Contact investigation beginning >111 days after exposure was a risk factor for TB infection (P = 0.02).CONCLUSION: The risk of TB following nosocomial exposure in sick neonates was high, particularly when contact investigation was delayed. Our findings underscore the importance of hospital policies that promote early detection of TB in HCP, reduce transmission in NICUs, and facilitate rapid case investigation.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Isoniazid , Tertiary Care Centers , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To estimate validity of two point of care glucometers for the diagnosis of neonatal hypoglycemia and to determine the glucometers cut off values for which standard laboratory confirmatory test are no longer needed. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTINGS: A tertiary care, university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 180 blood specimens from 166 high risk neonates aged between 1-24 hours. RESULTS: On average, most of the blood glucose read-outs from the Nova StatStrip and SureStep were higher than laboratory plasma glucose throughout the glucose range with mean differences (SD) of 11.2 (8.4) mg/dL and 13.7 (6.8) mg/dL, respectively. Sensitivity of Nova StatStrip and SureStep were 62% and 53.3%, respectively. Specificity and positive predictive value of both glucometers were 100%. Negative predictive values of both glucometers were approximately 85%. The cut-off levels with 100% negative predictive values were 63 mg/dL and 62 mg/dL for Nova StatStrip and SureStep, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: None of the glucometers in this study has sufficient validity to replace laboratory testing in diagnosing hypoglycemia. Confirmatory plasma glucose for diagnosis of hypoglycemia is needed when POC readings are between 39 and 63 mg/dL for Nova StatStrip and between 39 and 62 mg/dL for SureStep.
