A Minimally Interventional Approach to Oesophageal Atresia Repair With Early Enteral Feeding is Safe, Optimises Neonatal Outcomes, and Reduces Resource use.

PURPOSE: Recent series of newborn Oesophageal Atresia (OA) repair continue to report widespread use of chest drains, gastrostomy, routine contrast studies and parenteral nutrition (PN) despite evidence suggesting these are superfluous. We report outcomes using a minimally interventional approach to post-operative recovery. METHODS: Ethically approved (15/WA/0153), single-centre, retrospective case-note review of consecutive infants with OA 2000-2022. Infants with OA and distal trache-oesophageal fistula undergoing primary oesophageal anastomosis at initial surgery were included (including those with comorbidities such as duodenal atresia, anorectal malformation and cardiac lesions). Our practice includes routine use of a trans-anastomotic tube (TAT), no routine chest drain nor gastrostomy, early enteral and oral feeding, no routine PN and no routine contrast study. Data are median (IQR). RESULTS: Of total 186 cases of OA treated during the time period, 157 met the inclusion criteria of which 2 were excluded as casenotes unavailable. TAT was used in 150 infants. A chest drain was required in 13 (8%) and two infants had a neonatal gastrostomy. Enteral feeds were started on postoperative day 2 (2-3), full enteral feeds established by day 4 (4-6) and oral feeds started on day 5 (4-8). PN was required in 15%. Median postoperative length of stay was 10 days (8-17). Progress was quicker in term infants than preterm. One infant died of cardiac disease prior to neonatal discharge. Two planned post-operative contrast studies were performed (surgeon preference) and a further 7 due to clinical suspicion of anastomotic leak. Contrast study was therefore avoided in 94%. There were 2 anastomotic leaks; both presented clinically at day 4 and day 8 after oral feeds had been started. CONCLUSION: Our minimally interventional approach is safe. It facilitates prompt recovery with lower resource use, reduced demand on nursing staff, reduced radiation burden, and early discharge home compared to published series without adversely affecting outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

The role of ultrasound in detecting renal tract abnormalities following a single episode of epididymitis.

AIM: The aim of the study was to establish the utility of ultrasound scan in detecting renal tract abnormalities following a single episode of epididymitis. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective review of all boys diagnosed with epididymitis between October 2012 and 2017 including review of follow up imaging and clinical course was completed. Primary outcome was new diagnosis of renal tract abnormality by ultrasound. MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-four boys with a first diagnosis of epididymitis were identified. Sixty-four cases (76%) were diagnosed at scrotal exploration, the remaining twenty clinically. Median age was 7.30 years (range 0.08-15.83 years), and five had a positive urine culture at presentation. Forty-eight boys (57%) had a follow-up ultrasound scan (at median 4.57 weeks [range 1-31 weeks]). Only two renal tract abnormalities were identified by ultrasound scan, both in boys aged < 6 months, and neither was clinically relevant. Recurrent epididymitis occurred in 4 cases at median 26 days after initial presentation, of whom 3 had been followed up by ultrasound after initial presentation, all of which were normal. Further investigation revealed posterior urethral valves in 1 boy (age 6.5 months at initial presentation). CONCLUSION: Following a single episode of epididymitis, ultrasound was not helpful at detecting clinically relevant renal tract abnormalities, and furthermore did not identify the only patient with a clinically relevant abnormality. Based on these data, we propose follow-up imaging only in boys ≤ 6 months of age with a positive urine culture or a recurrent episode with consideration given to micturating cystogram even if ultrasound normal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Implementing an early feeding pathway post gastrostomy insertion reduces inpatient stay.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding optimal postoperative feeding strategy following gastrostomy insertion in children. The aim of this study was to determine whether implementing an early postoperative feeding pathway reduces length of stay (LOS) without increasing complications. METHODS: A retrospective case note review of all children having a new gastrostomy inserted during a one-year period prior to (July 2016-July 2017) and following (July 2017-July 2018) pathway introduction was performed. Children unable to follow the pathway for coexisting medical or nutritional reasons were excluded. The pathway comprised feeding 50% of normal feed 2 hours postprocedure, followed by 100% of normal feed at 5 and 8 h. Previously, patients were fed postoperatively according to surgeon preference. RESULTS: 116 cases met inclusion criteria, 55 prior to and 61 after pathway implementation. Children following the early feeding pathway had a shorter postoperative LOS than the historical group (median 28 vs 33 h, p < 0.003), while immediate (<72 h) and early (<30 day) complication rates were similar (8.2 vs 7.3%, p = 1.00 and 12 vs 16%, p = 0.59, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative feeding after gastrostomy insertion is safe and reduces LOS. TYPE OF STUDY: Quality improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Massive ovarian oedema: an unusual abdominal mass in infancy.

We describe a 13-month-old female who presented with vaginal bleeding, breast and pubic hair development and an abdominal mass. She underwent emergency laparotomy and left-sided salpingoophorectomy. Histological examination of the resected ovary revealed massive ovarian oedema, a rare non-neoplastic enlargement of the ovary. Consideration of this diagnosis in patients with an abdominal mass and endocrine disturbance may allow conservative surgery and preservation of fertility.

Information on the World Wide Web--how useful is it for parents?

AIM: An enormous amount of information about pediatric surgical conditions is available on the World Wide Web (www). Our aim was to ascertain how many parents accessed the www and how useful they found the exercise. METHOD: Over a 2-month period, all parents attending the surgical outpatient clinics were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding Internet use in seeking more information about their child's condition. Parents were able to tick more than one option to the questions. RESULTS: A total of 271 questionnaires were collected and analyzed. There were 53% of responders who had accessed the www. Of this group, 93% used a computer at home, with 60% using the Internet daily. The most popular search engine used was Google (75%). There were 90% who used their child's condition as keyword(s), with 21% using their child's symptoms. The most popular information sought is as follows: Ninety-four percent found the Internet useful. Of this group, 18% considered the information too technical, 18% too distressing, and 2% insufficiently specific. Of the group who did not find the Internet useful (6%), 50% found little or no information, 38% too much information, and 13% thought the details were too technical. Only 25% discussed their findings with their surgeons. Of those who did not, most found that the information was already covered by the surgeons or was irrelevant. CONCLUSION: The Internet is a useful educational tool in teaching parents about their child's condition. Parental use of the Internet is already widespread and may need to be specifically addressed during consultation. The best way to ensure that parents have access to quality and accurate information about their child's condition on the www, hence providing support, is to provide it ourselves.