Efficacy and safety of selective JAK 1 inhibitor filgotinib in active rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate: comparative study with filgotinib and tocilizumab examined by clinical index as well as musculoskeletal ultrasound assessment (TRANSFORM study): study protocol for a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, and non-inferiority clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Administration of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs has dramatically improved even the clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Dysregulation of JAK-STAT pathways via overproduction of cytokines, such as interleukin-6, is involved in the pathogenesis of RA. Filgotinib is a selective JAK1 inhibitor pending approval for use in RA. By inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathway, filgotinib is effective in suppressing disease activity and preventing the progression of joint destruction. Similarly, interleukin-6 inhibitors such as tocilizumab also inhibit the JAK-STAT pathways by inhibition of interleukin-6 signaling. We present the protocol for a study that will evaluate whether the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy is non-inferior to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX. METHODS: This study is an interventional, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, and non-inferiority clinical trial with a 52-week follow-up. Study participants will be 400 RA patients with at least moderate disease activity during treatment with MTX. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to administer filgotinib monotherapy or subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy switched from MTX. We will evaluate disease activity by measuring clinical disease activity indices and by using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve an American College of Rheumatology 50 response at week 12. Secondary endpoints are changes from baseline in the MSUS scores. We will also comprehensively analyze serum levels of multiple biomarkers, such as cytokines and chemokines. DISCUSSION: The study results are expected to show the non-inferiority of the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with inadequate response to MTX. The strength of this study is its prospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy using not only clinical disease activity indices, but also MSUS, which accurately and objectively evaluates disease activity at the joint level among patients drawn from multiple centers with a standardized evaluation by MSUS. We will evaluate the effectiveness of both drugs by integrating multilateral assessments-clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp ) jRCTs071200107. Registered on March 3, 2021. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT05090410. Registered on October 22, 2021.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of lascufloxacin for nursing and healthcare associated pneumonia: single-arm, open-label clinical trial: A study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Lascufloxacin hydrochloride (LSFX) is a quinolone antibiotic that inhibits DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV of bacteria, it is anticipated to minimize antibiotic resistance in bacteria. It exhibits antibacterial activity against a relatively wide range of bacterial species, including anaerobic bacteria, and its efficacy and safety against community-acquired pneumonia have been shown; however, its efficacy and safety against nursing and healthcare associated pneumonia (NHCAP) have not been verified. METHODS/DESIGN: Here, a single-arm, open-label, uncontrolled study was conducted in which LSFX was administered to patients with NHCAP at 24 facilities. The research subjects (77 cases) were orally administered 75 mg of LSFX once a day for 7 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical efficacy at the time of test of cure (TOC) (TOC; 5-10 days after the end of LSFX administration), while the secondary endpoints were the efficacy at the time of end of treatment, early clinical efficacy, microbiological efficacy at the time of TOC and end of treatment, and safety evaluation of LSFX. DISCUSSION: NHCAP is a common pneumonia in clinical settings and a notable pneumonia whose mortality is high compared to community-acquired pneumonia. The present study showed the efficacy and safety of LSFX against NHCAP, which could lead to a larger number of therapeutic options for NHCAP.