ABSTRACT
Background: Research has described differences in the provision of prehospital treatment for women who experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, studies have reported conflicting results regarding survival outcomes or in-hospital interventions between sexes. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the association of sex with survival outcomes and in-hospital treatments in Japan. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine-Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry. Patients aged ≥18 years who presented with a shockable rhythm at the scene between June 2014 and December 2020 were included in our analysis. Outcome measures were 30-day survival and in-hospital interventions. We compared the outcomes between the sexes using multivariable logistic regression. Results: In total, 5,926 patients (4,270 men; 1,026 women) with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were eligible for our analysis. The proportions of patients with 30-day survival outcomes were 39.5% (1685/4,270) and 37.4% (384/1,026) in the male and female groups, respectively (crude odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.06). Although there were no significant differences, survival outcomes tended to be better in women than in men in the multiple regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio: 1.38; 95% confidence interval: 0.82-2.33). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the sexes in terms of patients who received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (adjusted odds ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.49-1.33) or targeted temperature management (adjusted odds ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.68-1.46). Conclusions: After adjusting for prognostic factors, there were no differences in survival rates and in-hospital interventions between men and women.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Early prehospital advanced airway management (AAM) by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel has been intended to improve patient outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, few studies examine the effectiveness of early prehospital AAM. We investigated whether early prehospital AAM was associated with functionally favourable survival after adult OHCA. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of OHCA in Osaka, Japan, between 2005 and 2012. We included all consecutive, non-traumatic adult OHCA in which EMS personnel performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and AAM. Main exposure was time from CPR to AAM. Primary outcome was functionally favourable survival at one-month. As the primary analysis, we estimated adjusted odds ratio (OR) of time from CPR to AAM using multivariable logistic regression in the original cohort. In the secondary analysis, we divided the time from CPR to AAM into early (0-4â¯min) and late (5-29â¯min). We calculated propensity scores (PS) for early AAM and performed PS-matching. RESULTS: We included 27,471 patients who received prehospital AAM by EMS personnel. In this original cohort, time from CPR to AAM was inversely associated with functionally favourable survival (adjusted OR 0.90 for one-increment of minute, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.94). In the PS-matched cohort of 17,022 patients, early AAM, compared to late AAM, was associated with functionally favourable survival: 2.2% vs 1.4%; adjusted OR 1.58 (95% CI 1.24-2.02). CONCLUSIONS: Earlier prehospital AAM by EMS personnel was associated with functionally better survival among adult patients who received AAM.
