Efficacy of Plug Treatment for Complex Anorectal Fistulae: Long-term Danish Results.

PURPOSE: Bioprosthetic plugs are appealing, allow simple, repeatable applications, preserve sphincter integrity, minimize patient discomfort, and allow subsequent surgical options when needed. However, success rates vary widely. This study assessed the healing rate in our department when both the Cook-Surgisis and the Gore fistula plugs were used and the long-term effectiveness of using anal plugs for managing anal fistulae. METHODS: A chart review was performed for patients who had undergone plug insertion between January 2008 and December 2015 at Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre. Data were collected through a prospectively collected database. Plugs were inserted according to guidance provided by 2 experienced surgeons. Long-term results were determined by clinical visits 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and once yearly thereafter. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2015, 36 fistula plugs were inserted. During the follow-up period with a median duration of 18 months (range, 7-60 months), the fistulae of 52.8% of the patients healed. The plug failure rate was 44.4%, and the fistula recurrence rate was 26.3%. The median time to recurrence was 12 months. The overall success rate for plug treatment in our department was 39% when adjusted for recurrence. CONCLUSION: The use of bioprosthetic plugs to treat patients with complex anal fistulae seems to be a safe, viable option for complex fistula repair when other surgical attempts have failed. However, it should not be the treatment of choice. Further prospective randomized studies with a sufficient sample-size and standardized measurements are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of fistula plugs fully.

Watchful waiting versus colorectal resection after polypectomy for malignant colorectal polyps.

INTRODUCTION: Unexpected malignancy in removed colorectal polyps is reported in up to 9% of cases. The introduction of screening for colorectal cancer will inevitably increase the number of removed colorectal polyps and therefore also the incidence of malignant polyps. The treatment strategy is either watchful waiting or subsequent colorectal resection. The aim of this study was to perform a preliminary evaluation of the oncological results of polypectomy for malignant polyps with or without subsequent resection, including the patients' long-term survival. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 50 patients with unexpected malignancy after a polypectomy treated between January 2003 and January 2008. A total of 27 patients (54%) were treated with watchful waiting, and 23 (46%) underwent subsequent surgery. The Mann-Whitney U-test and chi-square test were used to compare the results between the two groups. RESULTS: There were more patients in the surgery group with positive resection margins after the polypectomy (p = 0.002). No difference was found regarding tumour differentiation grade, lymphovascular invasion, local recurrence or distant metastasis. Intraoperative complications occurred in three patients (13%, 95% confidence interval: 0-28%). In all, 16 of the 23 operated patients had no residual tumour. Overall long-term survival was higher among the operated patients (p = 0.005), but there was no difference in cancer-free survival (p = 0.071). CONCLUSION: Overtreatment of patients with malignant colorectal polyps seems to occur. Which patients benefit from further surgery has yet to be determined. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

Clinical quality indicators of venous leg ulcers: development, feasibility, and reliability.

In the clinical setting, diagnosis and treatment of venous leg ulcers can vary considerably from patient to patient. The first step to reducing this variation is to document venous leg ulcer care through use of quantitative scientific documentation principles. This requires the development of valid and reliable evidence-based quality indicators of venous leg ulcer care. A Scandinavian multidisciplinary, cross-sectional panel of wound healing experts developed clinical quality indicators on the basis of scientific evidence from the literature and subsequent group nominal consensus of the panel; an independent medical doctor tested the feasibility and reliability of these clinical indicators, assessing the quality of medical technical care on 100 consecutive venous leg ulcer patients. Main outcome measures were healing, recurrence, pain, venous disease diagnosis, differential diagnosis and treatment, and inter- and intra-rater reliability. The indicators proved feasible and reliable to measure (inter-rater kappa = 0.79, P < 0.01 and intra-rater kappa = 0.89, P < 0.1). Within 3 months of initial examination, venous etiology was verified by duplex in 61 of the 98 participating patients (62%) and 31 (32%) were assessed for venous surgery. Distal arterial pressure was measured following initial examination in 33 of the patients (34%). All patients (100%) were prescribed compression therapy. Of the 98 patients, 11 (11%) had ulcers recur in 3 months and 72 (73%) healed in 12 months, which is in line with the literature. It is feasible to reliably measure the quality of medical technical venous leg ulcer care in the clinical setting using a few strategic clinically relevant indicators of quality.

Venous leg ulcer patient priorities and quality of care: results of a survey.

A comprehensive patient evaluation of quality of care encompasses assessment and patient-rated prioritization of the various provisions of care. One hundred consecutive venous leg ulcer patients treated in a multidisciplinary wound healing center were invited to participate in a cross-sectional study to assess the quality of and assign priority to 28 aspects of medical technical, interpersonal, and organizational care. The response rate to the mailed questionnaire and follow-up telephone survey was 80%. Almost half (46%) of patients (median age 76 years, range 30 to 92) had an ulcer history of >5 years. Seventy-three patients (91%) were satisfied with the overall quality of care. A linear relationship was observed between average assessment score and the relative importance of the quality aspects studied. The quality of medical technical care and empathy aspects of interpersonal care received the most positive assessments and were given highest priority. Next in importance were the quality and coherence of information provided and cooperation between different healthcare sectors. Organizational aspects of care were less positively assessed and received lower priority ratings. Venous leg ulcer care, as provided in a multidisciplinary wound healing center, was assessed as satisfactory by patients, but areas for improvement - notably, cooperation between healthcare sectors and continuity of care - were observed.