Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JAMA Surg ; 157(10): 950-957, 2022 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36069928

ABSTRACT

Importance: Glucose control in patients after total pancreatectomy is problematic because of the complete absence of α- and ß-cells, leading to impaired quality of life. A novel, bihormonal artificial pancreas (BIHAP), using both insulin and glucagon, may improve glucose control, but studies in this setting are lacking. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of the BIHAP in patients after total pancreatectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized crossover clinical trial compared the fully closed-loop BIHAP with current diabetes care (ie, insulin pump or pen therapy) in 12 adult outpatients after total pancreatectomy. Patients were recruited between August 21 and November 16, 2020. This first-in-patient study began with a feasibility phase in 2 patients. Subsequently, 12 patients were randomly assigned to 7-day treatment with the BIHAP (preceded by a 5-day training period) followed by 7-day treatment with current diabetes care, or the same treatments in reverse order. Statistical analysis was by Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann-Whitney U tests, with significance set at a 2-sided P < .05. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in euglycemia (70-180 mg/dL [3.9-10 mmol/L]) as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring. Results: In total, 12 patients (7 men and 3 women; median [IQR] age, 62.5 [43.1-74.0] years) were randomly assigned, of whom 3 did not complete the BIHAP phase and 1 was replaced. The time spent in euglycemia was significantly higher during treatment with the BIHAP (median, 78.30%; IQR, 71.05%-82.61%) than current diabetes care (median, 57.38%; IQR, 52.38%-81.35%; P = .03). In addition, the time spent in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) was lower with the BIHAP (median, 0.00% [IQR, 0.00%-0.07%] vs 1.61% [IQR, 0.80%-3.81%]; P = .004). No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients using the BIHAP after total pancreatectomy experienced an increased percentage of time in euglycemia and a reduced percentage of time in hypoglycemia compared with current diabetes care, without apparent safety risks. Larger randomized trials, including longer periods of treatment and an assessment of quality of life, should confirm these findings. Trial Registration: trialregister.nl Identifier: NL8871.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Hypoglycemia , Pancreas, Artificial , Adult , Blood Glucose , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Glucagon/adverse effects , Humans , Hypoglycemia/chemically induced , Hypoglycemia/drug therapy , Insulin/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreas, Artificial/adverse effects , Pancreatectomy , Penicillin G/therapeutic use , Quality of Life
2.
Sensors (Basel) ; 21(17)2021 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34502845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Closed loop bi-hormonal artificial pancreas systems, such as the artificial pancreas (AP™) developed by Inreda Diabetic B.V., control blood glucose levels of type 1 diabetes mellitus patients via closed loop regulation. As the AP™ currently does not classify postures and movements to estimate metabolic energy consumption to correct hormone administration levels, considerable improvements to the system can be made. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate the possibility to use the current system to identify several postures and movements. METHODS: seven healthy participants took part in an experiment where sequences of postures and movements were performed to train and assess a computationally sparing algorithm. RESULTS: Using accelerometers, one on the hip and two on the abdomen, user-specific models achieved classification accuracies of 86.5% using only the hip sensor and 87.3% when including the abdomen sensors. With additional accelerometers on the sternum and upper leg for identification, 90.0% of the classified postures and movements were correct. CONCLUSIONS: The current hardware configuration of the AP™ poses no limitation to the identification of postures and movements. If future research shows that identification can still be done accurately in a daily life setting, this algorithm may be an improvement for the AP™ to sense physical activity.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Pancreas, Artificial , Wearable Electronic Devices , Algorithms , Blood Glucose , Humans , Insulin , Movement , Posture
3.
Diabetes Care ; 44(3): 836-838, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33397767

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the performance and safety of a bihormonal (insulin and glucagon) artificial pancreas (AP) in adults with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this outpatient, randomized, crossover trial, 2-week fully closed loop glucose control (AP therapy) was compared with 2-week open loop control (patient's normal insulin pump therapy with a glucose sensor if they had one). RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were included in the analysis. Time in range (70-180 mg/dL [3.9-10 mmol/L]) was significantly higher during closed loop (median 86.6% of time [interquartile range 84.9-88.5]) compared with open loop (53.9% [49.7-67.2]; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with insulin pump therapy, the bihormonal AP provided superior glucose control, without meal or exercise announcements, and was safe in adults with type 1 diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Pancreas, Artificial , Adult , Blood Glucose , Cross-Over Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Insulin Infusion Systems , Outpatients
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...