Initiating insulin therapy in elderly patients with Type 2 diabetes: efficacy and safety of lispro mix 25 vs. basal insulin combined with oral glucose-lowering agents.

AIMS: To compare starter insulins in the elderly subgroup of the DURABLE trial 24-week initiation phase. METHODS: In a post-hoc analysis of the > or = 65 years subgroup enrolled in the DURABLE trial, we compared the safety and efficacy of lispro mix 25 (LM25: lispro 25%/insulin lispro protamine suspension 75%), n = 258, vs. glargine, n = 222, added to oral glucose-lowering agents. RESULTS: Baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) was similar (LM25 8.7 +/- 1.2, glargine 8.8 +/- 1.1%, P = 0.612). At 24-weeks, LM25 patients had lower HbA(1c) (7.0 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.3 +/- 0.9%, P < 0.001), greater HbA(1c) reduction (-1.7 +/- 1.2 vs. -1.5 +/- 1.1%, P < 0.001), and more patients reaching HbA(1c) < 7.0% (55.6 vs. 41.0%, P = 0.005). LM25 patients were on more insulin (0.40 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.33 +/- 0.19 u/kg/day, P < 0.001) and experienced more weight gain (3.6 +/- 3.6 vs. 1.8 +/- 3.2 kg, P < 0.001). Additionally, LM25-treated patients reported a higher mean overall hypoglycaemia rate than glargine patients (40.8 +/- 47.6 vs. 31.1 +/- 48.5 episodes/patient/year, P = 0.037), while nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates were similar. Over 24 weeks, incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was higher for LM25 (4.3% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.018); however, by 24-week endpoint incidence was similar (0.8% vs. 0.0%P = 0.125). CONCLUSIONS: In this elderly subgroup post-hoc analysis, LM25 demonstrated a lower endpoint HbA(1c) and a higher % of patients reaching HbA(1c) target of < 7.0%, but with more weight gain and higher rates of hypoglycaemia compared to glargine.

The effect of pramlintide on hormonal, metabolic or symptomatic responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Pramlintide, a human amylin analogue, is a potential new adjunctive therapy to insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes and insulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes. Early clinical trials have shown a transient increased risk of hypoglycaemia in some patients at the time of initiating pramlintide therapy. This may be the result of combining the postprandial glucose, lowering effect of pramlintide with the existing hypoglycaemic potential of insulin without appropriate adjustment of insulin doses. However, the possibility that pramlintide may exert an independent detrimental effect on the physiological responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia needs to be excluded. METHODS: We conducted three separate randomized, placebo-controlled studies in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with adjunctive pramlintide. These studies utilized pramlintide at high doses (either 0.1-1 mg pramlintide daily or 0.1-0.8 mg pramlintide four times a day for 5 or 6 days) as well as doses closer to those anticipated for therapeutic usage (30, 100 or 300 microg three times daily for 14 days), and examined the hormonal, metabolic and symptomatic responses to an insulin-infusion hypoglycaemic challenge conducted at baseline and after days of therapy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Pramlintide had no effect on the counter-regulatory hormonal, metabolic and symptomatic responses to hypoglycaemia. These findings demonstrated that pramlintide, when used as adjunctive therapy to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes, has no independent effect on the response to hypoglycaemia.

Recombinant glucagon-like peptide-1 (7-36 amide) lowers fasting serum glucose in a broad spectrum of patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of various doses of recombinant glucagon-like peptide-1 (7-36) amide (rGLP-1) administered subcutaneously (s. c.) via bolus injection or continuous infusion to lower fasting serum glucose (FSG) levels in subjects with type 2 diabetes treated by diet, hypoglycemic drugs, or insulin injection. METHODS: rGLP-1 was administered s. c. to 40 type 2 diabetics currently treated by diet, sulfonylurea (SU), metformin, or insulin in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial; preexisting treatments were continued during the study. In the bolus injection protocol, 32 subjects (8 from each of the 4 treatment groups) received 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 nmol rGLP-1/kg per injection (two injections, two hours apart, beginning one hour after the evening meal) in a randomized order on separate days. In the continuous s. c. infusion protocol, 40 subjects received rGLP-1 at 0.0, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 pmol/kg/min for 10-12 hours overnight starting one hour after the evening meal. Fasting bloods were taken the morning after for glucose, insulin, and glucagon measurements. RESULTS: In the diet, SU, and metformin cohorts, bolus rGLP-1 injections produced modest reductions in mean FSG levels, averaging 17.4 mg/dl (7.3-27.5; 95 % CI) at the highest dose (p < 0.001 vs. placebo). Reductions in FSG levels were greater by continuous infusion at up to 30.3 mg/dl (18.8 - 41.8; 95 % CI; p < 0.001 vs. placebo). The greatest reduction in mean FSG occurred in the SU cohort (up to 43.9 mg/dl, 24.7 - 63.1; 95 % CI; p < 0.001). rGLP-1 infusions resulted in significant increases in fasting plasma insulin and decreases in fasting plasma glucagon levels. There were no serious adverse events; GI-related symptoms were dose-related and more commonly associated with injections. CONCLUSIONS: rGLP-1 (7-36) amide dose-dependently lowered FSG in a broad spectrum of type 2 diabetics when added to their existing treatment. Subcutaneous infusion was more effective than injection, and the combination with SU was more effective than with metformin.

A 16-week comparison of the novel insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE 901) and NPH human insulin used with insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of the long-acting insulin analog, insulin glargine, as a component of basal bolus therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with type 1 diabetes receiving basal-bolus insulin treatment with NPH human insulin and insulin lispro were randomized to receive insulin glargine (HOE 901), a long-acting basal insulin analog, once a day (n = 310) or NPH human insulin (n = 309) as basal treatment with continued bolus insulin lispro for 16 weeks in an open-label study NPH insulin patients maintained their prior schedule of administration once or twice a day, whereas insulin glargine patients received basal insulin once a day at bedtime. RESULTS: Compared with all NPH insulin patients, insulin glargine patients had significant decreases in fasting blood glucose measured at home (means +/- SEM, -42.0 +/- 4.7 vs. -12.4 +/- 4.7 mg/dl [-2.33 +/- 0.26 vs. -0.69 +/- 0.26 mmol/l]; P = 0.0001). These differences were evident early and persisted throughout the study More patients in the insulin glargine group (29.6%) than in the NPH group (16.8%) reached a target fasting blood glucose of 119 mg/dl (< 6.6 mmol/l). However, there were no differences between the groups with respect to change in GHb. Insulin glargine treatment was also associated with a significant decrease in the variability of fasting blood glucose values (P = 0.0124). No differences in the occurrence of symptomatic hypoglycemia, including nocturnal hypoglycemia, were observed. Overall, adverse events were similar in the two treatment groups with the exception of injection site pain, which was more common in the insulin glargine group (6.1%) than in the NPH group (0.3%). Weight gain was 0.12 kg in insulin glargine patients and 0.54 kg in NPH insulin patients (P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Basal insulin therapy with insulin glargine once a day appears to be as safe and at least as effective as using NPH insulin once or twice a day in maintaining glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes receiving basal-bolus insulin treatment with insulin lispro.

BB rat diabetes susceptibility and body weight regulation genes colocalize on chromosome 2.

The genetic etiology of Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus is complicated by the apparent presence of several diabetes susceptibility genetic regions. Type 1 diabetes in the inbred BioBreeding (BB) rat closely resembles the human disorder and was previously shown to involve two genes: the lymphopenia (lyp) region on Chromosome (Chr) 4 and RT1(u) in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on Chr 20. In addition, a segregation analysis of an F(2) intercross between the diabetes-prone congenic BB DR(lyp/lyp, u/u) and F344(+/+,)(lv/lv) rats indicated that at least one more genetic factor was responsible for Type 1 diabetes. In this study, we generated F(2)N(2) progeny in a cross between non-diabetic F(2)(DR(lyp/lyp,u/u) x F344)(lyp/lyp,u/u) and diabetic DR(lyp/lyp, u/u) rats. In a subsequent total genome scan, a third factor was mapped to the 21.3-cM region on Chr 2 between D2Mit14 and D2Mit15 (peak LOD score 4.7 with 67% penetrance). Interestingly, the homozygosity of the BB allele (b/b) for the Chr 2 region was significantly associated with a greater weight reduction after fasting than the homozygosity of the F344 allele (f/f, p < 0.008). In conclusion, the development of Type 1 diabetes in the congenic DR(lyp/lyp) rat is controlled by at least three genes: lymphopenia, MHC, and a third factor that may play a role in metabolism and body weight regulation.

Effect of 14 days' subcutaneous administration of the human amylin analogue, pramlintide (AC137), on an intravenous insulin challenge and response to a standard liquid meal in patients with IDDM.

Individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM or type 1 diabetes) are deficient in both insulin and amylin, peptides secreted by the beta cell. We have investigated the effects of amylin replacement therapy employing the human amylin analogue, pramlintide (25, 28, 29-pro-human amylin, previously referred to as AC137), upon the responses to a standardized insulin infusion (40 mU. kg-1. h-1) for 100 min and a liquid Sustacal meal (360 kcal) in 84 healthy IDDM patients. Following baseline evaluations, patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo, 30, 100 or 300 micrograms pramlintide 30 min before meals for 14 days. There was no meaningful difference between adverse events reported by the 30-micrograms pramlintide and the placebo groups, but ten subjects withdrew due to nausea, eight of these in the 300-micrograms dose group. Peak plasma pramlintide concentrations for the 30-micrograms group were 21 +/- 3 and 29 +/- 5 pmol/l on Days 1 and 14, respectively. These values are similar to postprandial plasma amylin concentrations in normal volunteers. The plasma glucose, free insulin, glucagon, epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations during the insulin infusion test before and after therapy were identical in each of the group. Prior to pramlintide therapy, Sustacal ingestion produced a 4.0-4.8 mmol/l rise in plasma glucose concentrations in each of the groups. Pramlintide therapy reduced postprandial hyperglycaemia as reflected by the 3-h incremental AUCglucose (AUCglucose above or below fasting glucose concentration) Day 1 vs Day 14: 30 micrograms, 322 +/- 92 vs -38 +/- 161 mmol/l.min, p = 0.010; 100 micrograms, 317 +/- 92 vs -39 +/- 76 mmol/l.min, p = 0.001; and 300 micrograms, 268 +/- 96 vs -245 +/- 189 mmol/l.min, p = 0.077. Thus, pramlintide therapy with these regimens did not appear to impair either in vivo insulin action or the counter-regulatory response to hypoglycaemia but did show a clear effect of blunting postprandial hyperglycaemia following a standardized meal.

Increased specificity and sensitivity of insulin antibody measurements in autoimmune thyroid disease and type I diabetes.

Insulin autoantibodies (IAA), a marker for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), have been reported in other diseases such as thyroid disease and after treatment with sulfhydryl containing medications. Reported prevalences of IAA in non-diabetics vary widely, probably due in part to methodological differences between laboratories. In addition, certain sera may have a high non-specific binding to insulin. We compared a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for IAA which included non-specific binding with an RIA that incorporated a competitive displacement with cold insulin to remove non-specific binding. Using the RIA which measured specific plus non-specific binding, IAA positivity was found in 22/92 (23.9%) of sera from thyroid disease patients, 16/124 (12.9%) of random masked sera from a hospital laboratory, 27/335 (8.1%) of first degree relatives of IDDM patients, 63/178 (35.4%) of subjects with newly diagnosed IDDM, and 0/92 (0%) of normal controls. Insulin antibodies (IA) were found in 80/99 (80.8%) of insulin-treated diabetic subjects. In contrast, using the displacement assay which allowed measurement of specific binding, the frequency of IAA positivity was lower for subjects with thyroid disease (7/92 (7.6%)), random hospital sera (12/124 (9.8%)), and for first degree relatives of IDDM patients (8/335 (2.4%)), while higher for subjects with newly diagnosed IDDM (71/178 (39.9%)). Subjects with insulin-treated diabetes (78/99 (78.8%)) and normal subjects (1/92 (1.1%)) showed little change. Strikingly, three of the eight (37.5%) relatives of IDDM patients that were positive in the RIA measuring specific binding were detected only because cold displacement was utilized. We conclude: (1) subjects with thyroid disease and first degree relatives of IDDM patients frequently have high non-specific binding for IAA in an RIA not employing a cold displacement step, (2) in some newly diagnosed IDDM patients and first degree relatives of IDDM patients, IAA may be missed by an assay not optimized to measure specific binding, and (3) displacement with cold insulin increases both the specificity and sensitivity of RIAs measuring insulin autoantibodies.

Intra-islet insulin permits glucose to directly suppress pancreatic A cell function.

Inhibition of pancreatic glucagon secretion during hyperglycemia could be mediated by (a) glucose, (b) insulin, (c) somatostatin, or (d) glucose in conjunction with insulin. To determine the role of these factors in the mediation of glucagon suppression, we injected alloxan while clamping the arterial supply of the pancreatic splenic lobe of dogs, thus inducing insulin deficiency localized to the ventral lobe and avoiding hyperglycemia. Ventral lobe insulin, glucagon, and somatostatin outputs were then measured in response to a stepped IV glucose infusion. In control dogs glucagon suppression occurred at a glucose level of 150 mg/dl and somatostatin output increased at glucose greater than 250 mg/dl. In alloxan-treated dogs glucagon output was not suppressed nor did somatostatin output increase. We concluded that insulin was required in the mediation of glucagon suppression and somatostatin stimulation. Subsequently, we infused insulin at high rates directly into the artery that supplied the beta cell-deficient lobe in six alloxan-treated dogs. Insulin infusion alone did not cause suppression of glucagon or stimulation of somatostatin; however, insulin repletion during glucose infusions did restore the ability of hyperglycemia to suppress glucagon and stimulate somatostatin. We conclude that intra-islet insulin permits glucose to suppress glucagon secretion and stimulate somatostatin during hyperglycemia.

Treatment with a somatostatin analog decreases pancreatic B-cell and whole body sensitivity to glucose.

To determine the specific alteration in B-cell function caused by a somatostatin analog in man and to determine the effect of the induced insulin deficiency on insulin action, we administered octreotide (SMS 201-995; 50 micrograms twice daily) to nine healthy male subjects, aged 24-35 yr. B-Cell function was assessed by measuring the acute insulin response (AIR) to glucose (AIRglucose) at fasting glucose and to arginine (AIRarg) at glucose concentrations of fasting, approximately 14 and more than 28 mM after 2 (n = 7) and 8 days (n = 9) of octreotide. The AIRarg at more than 28 mM glucose (AIR500) is an estimate of B-cell secretory capacity, while the glucose level at which 50% of AIR500 occurs is termed PG50 and can provide an estimate of B-cell glucose sensitivity. Insulin sensitivity and the parameters describing glucose disposal were measured using Bergman's minimal model. Octreotide administration resulted in the development of mild fasting hyperglycemia, marked fasting hypoinsulinemia, as well as a marked reduction in AIRglucose [mean +/- SE; pretreatment, 260 +/- 48 pM; 1 day, 62 +/- 14 pM (P less than 0.005 vs. pretreatment); 8 days, 62 +/- 7 pM (P less than 0.005 vs. pretreatment)]. In addition, there was an associated marked reduction in iv glucose tolerance. While the AIRarg at fasting glucose (pretreatment, 233 +/- 27 pM; 2 days, 144 +/- 27 pM; 8 days 281 +/- 55 pM) and AIR500 (pretreatment 1000 +/- 178 pM; 2 days, 651 +/- 82 pM; 8 days, 1041 +/- 219 pM) remained unchanged, the AIRarg at 14 mM decreased significantly during octreotide [pretreatment 986 +/- 178 pM; 2 days, 363 +/- 62 pM (P less than 0.001 vs. pretreatment); 8 days, 623 +/- 130 pM (P less than 0.005 vs. pretreatment)], resulting in a rightward shift of the dose-response curve such that the estimated PG50 increased from 8.8 +/- 0.6 to 12.9 +/- 1.3 mM (P less than 0.05) after 2 days and was maintained for 8 days (11.2 +/- 0.8 mM; P less than 0.05 vs. pretreatment). Despite the development of marked insulin deficiency, the insulin sensitivity index (SI) did not change significantly (pretreatment, 11.34 +/- 1.59 x 10(-5); 1 day, 10.01 +/- 2.28 x 10(-5); 7 days, 9.65 +/- 1.69 x 10(-5) min-1/pM).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Lack of systematically found insulin autoantibodies in spontaneously diabetic BB rats.

Insulin autoantibodies (IAAs) occur in newly diagnosed human insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients, but their presence in BB rats is controversial, possibly due to assay differences or variability in the animals studied. To resolve this controversy, IAAs were measured in well-characterized inbred BB rats both in radioligand assays with 125I-labeled rat insulin I or II, respectively, and in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with rat insulin as antigen. In prospective studies, a total of 57 serums from 16 diabetes-prone (DP) BB rats were obtained during an interval ranging from 15 wk to the last week before onset and at onset of diabetes. At comparable ages, 21 serums were obtained from 8 DP BB rats not developing diabetes, and 70 matched serums were obtained from 19 diabetes-resistant (DR) BB rats. Levels of antibody binding increased slightly with increasing age in DP and matched DR rats. Two rats were positive at onset of IDDM in all assays but not in earlier samples. Otherwise, only few isolated serums from both types of rats regardless of diabetes had increased binding in one of the assays. In a cross-sectional study, the insulin-binding levels in 150-day-old DP rats (n = 20) that had not yet developed diabetes did not correlate with insulitis present in 3 of 20 rats and did not differ from 150-day-old DR BB rats (n = 20).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nonprogression of subclinical beta-cell dysfunction among first-degree relatives of IDDM patients. 5-yr follow-up of the Seattle Family Study.

It is unknown among first-degree relatives of individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) whether the disease process occurs in relatively few but always progresses to clinical IDDM or whether subclinical disease is more common but remains nonprogressive in many cases. Islet cell antibodies (ICAs) were found in 21 of 724 (2.9%) first-degree relatives during screening in the greater Seattle area between 1983 and 1988. Measures of beta-cell function (glucose disappearance rate [Kg], fasting insulin, acute insulin response to intravenous arginine [AIRarg], acute insulin response to intravenous glucose [AIRgluc], slope of glucose potentiation of AIRarg) and insulin sensitivity were obtained. Twenty individuals, 9 ICA+ relatives and 11 ICA- relatives, were evaluated prospectively. When expressed in relation to the expected AIRgluc based on each subject's sensitivity index, AIRgluc in 18 of 20 relatives fell below 100%, indicating inappropriately low insulin secretion (subclinical beta-cell dysfunction). After a median follow-up of 42 mo, 10 of 11 ICA- relatives remained ICA-. None showed deteriorating beta-cell dysfunction, and none developed diabetes. Five ICA+ relatives showed persistent immunologic positivity. beta-Cell function remained remarkably stable in all except 2 relatives. One was a 15-yr-old boy who developed IDDM shortly after screening and before evaluation of beta-cell function could be carried out. The other was an 18-yr-old monozygotic twin who developed IDDM after 27 mo. Both of these individuals had ICAs of 80 Juvenile Diabetes Foundation U and had been discordant for less than 5 yr.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Responses of the pancreatic A cell during hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia are dependent on the B cell.

It is controversial whether stimulation of glucagon secretion by hypoglycemia or suppression by hyperglycemia is a direct effect of glucose on the A cell or whether it is mediated indirectly through the B cell. To determine the role of the B cell in the mediation of glucagon secretion adolescent male baboons were studied before and after successive injections of streptozocin designed to cause B-cell destruction in a series of stages. Following one dose of streptozocin, B-cell function was impaired but fasting blood glucose remained normal. B-cell function declined further with additional doses of streptozocin. As B-cell function declined, there was a corresponding reduction in the glucagon response to hypoglycemia (Ghyp). There were significant correlations between the percentage reduction in Ghyp and the percentage reduction in B-cell function (acute insulin response to arginine, r = .47; acute insulin response to glucose, r = .69; Kg, r = .79). In a second study the ability of hyperglycemia to suppress the acute glucagon response to arginine (AGRarg) was studied. Before streptozocin AGRarg was 128 +/- 26 pg/mL at a glucose level of 80 +/- 4 mg/dL and was suppressed to 74 +/- 20 pg/mL when glucose was raised and clamped at 209 +/- 14 mg/dL. After the initial dose of streptozocin, with mild B cell damage and fasting normoglycemia, AGRarg was not suppressed by hyperglycemia. With severe B cell dysfunction and fasting hyperglycemia, there was paradoxical enhancement of AGRarg by additional hyperglycemia. In conclusion, the ability of the A cell to respond appropriately to hypoglycemia and to arginine during hyperglycemia is dependent on normal B-cell function.

Somatostatin-28 does not regulate islet function in the dog.

Somatostatin-28 (S-28) is a naturally occurring N-terminally extended form of the tetradecapeptide somatostatin (S-14). The concept has arisen that S-28 is a gut hormone that regulates insulin secretion. This concept is based on 1) reports that S-28 is a more potent inhibitor of insulin secretion than S-14; 2) the finding that S-28 is present in D-cells of the intestine and is released after a meal; and 3) the demonstration of selective binding of S-28 to B-cells of the rat islet. To critically test this hypothesis we have 1) measured the circulating levels of somatostatin-like immunoreactivity (SLI) during infusions of S-28 and S-14 to accurately compare their potencies to inhibit insulin and glucagon secretion from the in vivo dog pancreas, and 2) measured the circulating levels of endogenous SLI released after a meal and compared these to the circulating levels of infused S-28 needed to inhibit insulin secretion. Infusion of S-28 at rates of 170 and 500 pmol/min raised arterial SLI levels by 282 +/- 26 and 885 +/- 98 fmol/ml, respectively. Immunoreactive insulin (IRI) output was inhibited by 20 +/- 11% (P less than 0.05) and 52 +/- 7% (P less than 0.0005), respectively. Immunoreactive glucagon (IRG) output was not significantly altered by either dose. Pancreatic SLI output was inhibited by 32 +/- 5% (P less than 0.0005) by the 500 pmol/min infusion. Infusion of S-28 at 50 pmol/min increased arterial SLI by 108 +/- 17 fmol/ml, but did not alter IRI output (+4 +/- 20%). In comparison, infusion of S-14 (100 pmol/min) raised arterial SLI levels by a similar amount (110 +/- 21 fmol/ml), but, unlike S-28, inhibited both IRI (-50 +/- 6%, P less than 0.0005) and IRG output (-17 +/- 8%; P less than 0.05). Thus, comparable increments in arterial S-28 failed to reproduce the inhibition of IRI secretion seen during the S-14 infusion, while similar inhibition was seen with an 8-fold increment. This suggests that S-28 is significantly less potent than S-14 in the dog. After a mixed meal, endogenous SLI levels increased by 35 +/- 3 fmol/ml in arterial plasma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Insulin autoantibodies at diagnosis of insulin-dependent diabetes: effect on the antibody response to insulin treatment.

Insulin autoantibodies (IAA) are frequently found in newly diagnosed untreated insulin-dependent diabetics. We evaluated whether the insulin antibody response over the first year of treatment with insulin was different in individuals with IAA v those without IAA. One hundred five previously untreated type I diabetics were randomly assigned to treatment with either pure porcine or mixed bovine/porcine insulin. Twenty-one in each group had detectable IAA at diagnosis. Percent binding rose in all patients after commencing insulin therapy and was significantly greater in those with IAA at diagnosis irrespective of the type of insulin administered. The elevated binding in the IAA positive patients at all time points was equivalent to the binding that could be attributed to the insulin autoantibodies. Two different mechanisms could explain this greater insulin antibody binding during insulin therapy in the IAA positive patients. First, there may be summation of binding due to insulin autoantibodies and binding due to insulin antibodies formed in response to the exogenous insulin. Alternatively, the insulin antibodies formed in response to exogenous insulin could replace the IAA, with those individuals positive for IAA at diagnosis having a proportionately greater antibody response to injected insulin. Irrespective of the mechanism, patients with IAA at diagnosis develop higher insulin antibody measurements when subsequently treated with exogenous insulin.

Defects in beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity in normoglycemic streptozocin-treated baboons: a model of preclinical insulin-dependent diabetes.

During the preclinical period of human insulin-dependent diabetes, both impaired pancreatic beta-cell function and increased insulin resistance are found, although normoglycemia is preserved. To better understand the changes in beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity that occur in preclinical insulin-dependent diabetes, we performed a panel of in vivo beta-cell function tests and measured insulin sensitivity in adolescent male baboons both in normal health and after a small dose of streptozocin which did not induce hyperglycemia. Nine animals were studied before (stage 1) and 1 week after receiving a low dose of streptozocin (stage 2). There was no change in fasting plasma glucose or insulin. The mean glucose disposal rate (Kg) remained within the normal range, but dropped from 2.0 +/- 0.2% +/- SE) to 1.2 +/- 0.1%/min (P less than 0.01), the acute insulin response to arginine (AIR(arg)) fell from 67.7 +/- 19.4 microU/mL (485.8 +/- 139.2 pmol/L) to 32.8 +/- 7.2 microU/mL (235.3 +/- 51.7 pmol/L; P less than 0.05), and the acute insulin response to glucose (AIR(gluc)) fell from 881 +/- 243 microU/mL.10 min (6321 +/- 1744 pmol/L.10 min) to 334 +/- 82 microU/mL.10 min (2396 +/- 588 pmol/L.10 min; P less than 0.01). The most dramatic change, however, was in the ability of hyperglycemia to potentiate AIR(arg) (expressed as the slope of potentiation). This was reduced by 94% from 1.8 +/- 0.5 to 0.1 +/- 0.1 (P less than 0.01), with almost no overlap in values between stages 1 and 2. Insulin sensitivity was also lower 1 week after streptozocin treatment. When the animals were restudied 8 weeks after streptozocin treatment (stage 3) most measures of beta-cell function were not significantly different from those in stage 1. The fasting plasma glucose level was 85.4 +/- 4.3 mg/dL (4.7 +/- 0.2 mmol/L), Kg was 1.8 +/- 0.3%/min, fasting plasma insulin was 35.9 +/- 8.5 microU/mL (257.6 +/- 61.0 pmol/L), AIR(arg) was 67.0 +/- 15.4 microU/mL (480.7 +/- 110.5 pmol/L), and AIR(gluc) was 615.3 +/- 265.3 microU/mL.10 min (4413 +/- 1901 pmol/L.10 min), and tissue insulin sensitivity was 2.7 +/- 0.4 x 10(4) min/microU.mL. These values show extensive overlap with those of stage 1, from which they are not significantly different. The slope of glucose potentiation, however, remained low in all animals at stage 3.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Pancreatic somatostatinoma: presentation with recurrent episodes of severe hyperglycaemia and ketoacidosis.

A 47-year-old woman was admitted on four occasions over a four-year period with severe hyperglycaemia associated with marked ketoacidosis. She had weight loss with hepatomegaly and ultrasonography indicated a pancreatic tumour which was shown to be a somatostatinoma. Resection resulted in prolonged survival. The biochemical and morphological features of this rare tumour are presented, and an explanation for the unusual presentation of a somatostatinoma with episodes of ketoacidosis is given.

The incidence and causes of hypercalcaemia.

A prospective screen for hypercalcaemia in 58,053 hospital in-patients was conducted over 12 months. The incidence of hypercalcaemia was 0.6%, being transient in 19.2% of patients and sustained in the remainder. The most common causes in the sustained group were malignancy (45%) and primary hyperparathyroidism (16.5%). The incidence of primary hyperparathyroidism was 78/100,000 hospital in-patients, and its discovery was directly attributable to the survey in over half the cases.

Beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic HLA-identical siblings of insulin-dependent diabetics.

Insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity were compared in 12 HLA-identical siblings of insulin-dependent diabetics and nondiabetic controls. Only the maximum acute insulin response to intravenous arginine was lower in the siblings than in the matched controls (P less than .05); other measures of insulin secretion, including the acute insulin response to glucose or arginine, the second-phase insulin response to glucose, and the slope of glucose potentiation, were not significantly different. Insulin sensitivity, derived from an intravenous glucose tolerance test with a minimal-modeling technique, was lower in the siblings (P less than .01). In a large group of nondiabetic controls of various adiposity, insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity were inversely related. In view of the difference in insulin sensitivity between siblings and matched controls, a direct comparison of beta-cell function tests may be inappropriate, and the measures of insulin secretion were compared with those of nondiabetics when adjusted for differences in insulin sensitivity. This analysis revealed that all measures of insulin secretion were significantly lower in the siblings. We conclude that HLA-identical siblings of insulin-dependent diabetics show evidence of both insulin resistance and impaired beta-cell function and that analysis of beta-cell function in relation to insulin sensitivity shows a greater frequency of beta-cell secretory abnormalities than previously appreciated.

Role of pancreatic somatostatin in determining glucagon response to arginine and morphine.

It has been proposed that pancreatic somatostatin (SS) tonically inhibits pancreatic glucagon secretion. In keeping with this hypothesis, we have previously shown that infusion of a nonimmunoreactive analogue of SS, [D-Ala5,D-Trp8]somatostatin (SSa), which in low doses inhibits SS secretion without inhibiting glucagon or insulin secretion, is associated with a large increase in glucagon and small increase in insulin secretion. Although direct stimulation of the alpha- and beta-cells by the analogue could not be excluded, high doses of the analogue appeared to inhibit insulin and glucagon secretion. These data therefore suggested that the effect of the analogue on insulin and glucagon secretion was indirect and due to reduction of tonic inhibition on the alpha- and beta-cells by SS. If pancreatic SS is an important regulator of glucagon secretion, then alterations in pancreatic SS should influence the glucagon response to secretagogues. Therefore, in the present study, we have examined the glucagon response to two different stimuli, arginine and morphine, either before or during suppression of pancreatic SS secretion. Intravenous injection of arginine produced a rapid increase of pancreatic glucagon output from the in vivo dog pancreas. When basal pancreatic SS output was suppressed by infusion of SSa, arginine injection produced a twofold larger glucagon response. Infusion of morphine directly into the pancreatic artery of the dog decreased pancreatic SS output and increased pancreatic glucagon output. When SS was suppressed by SSa infusion, morphine did not further suppress pancreatic SS secretion and the glucagon response to morphine was abolished.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)