Depressed adolescents in a case-series were low in vitamin D and depression was ameliorated by vitamin D supplementation.

AIM: The relationship between depression in adolescents and vitamin D was studied in a case-series that included effects of vitamin D supplementation. METHODS: Serum 25OH vitamin D (25OHD) levels in 54 Swedish depressed adolescents were investigated. Subjects with vitamin D deficiency were given vitamin D(3) over 3 months (n = 48). To evaluate well-being and symptoms related to depression and vitamin D status, the WHO-5 well-being scale, the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ-S) and a vitamin D deficiency scale were used. RESULTS: Mean serum 25OHD in the depressed adolescents was 41 at baseline and 91 nmol/L (p < 0.001) after supplementation. Basal 25OHD levels correlated positively with well-being (p < 0.05). After vitamin D supplementation, well-being increased (p < 0.001) and there was a significant improvement in eight of the nine items in the vitamin D deficiency scale: depressed feeling (p < 0.001), irritability (p < 0.05), tiredness (p < 0.001), mood swings (p < 0.01), sleep difficulties (p < 0.01), weakness (p < 0.01), ability to concentrate (p < 0.05) and pain (p < 0.05). There was a significant amelioration of depression according to the MFQ-S (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed low levels of vitamin D in 54 depressed adolescents, positive correlation between vitamin D and well-being, and improved symptoms related to depression and vitamin D deficiency after vitamin D supplementation.

Thyroid hormone replacement for central hypothyroidism: a randomized controlled trial comparing two doses of thyroxine (T4) with a combination of T4 and triiodothyronine.

BACKGROUND: Dosage of T(4) in central hypothyroidism is primarily guided by the free serum T(4) level (fT4). However, the optimum fT4 range is ill defined, and subtle hypothyroidism might be missed using this approach. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate the effects of a body weight (bw)-adapted T(4) treatment, alone or in combination with T(3), on metabolism, well-being, and cognitive function in comparison to a regimen leading to normal fT4. DESIGN: This was a placebo-controlled trial (double-blind, crossover). PATIENTS: A total of 29 patients (age 52 +/- 2 yr; females/males, 8/21) with hypopituitarism, including TSH deficiency, participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Three regimens were compared (5 wk each): "EMPIRICAL-T4," empirical T(4) dosage (1 +/- 0.05 microg/kg bw) leading to normal fT4; BW-ADAPTED-T4 (1.6 microg/kg bw T(4)); and "BW-ADAPTED-T3T4," bw-adapted combination of T(3) and T(4) (ratio of 1:10). RESULTS: BW-ADAPTED-T4 administration increased mean fT4 concentrations to the upper limit of the normal range (peak levels). Compared with EMPIRICAL-T4, BW-ADAPTED-T4 treatment resulted in a lower body mass index (BMI) (29.0 +/- 0.7 vs. 29.5 +/- 0.7 kg/m(2); P < 0.03), lower total cholesterol (198 +/- 9 vs. 226 +/- 7 mg/dl; P < 0.01), and lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (116 +/- 5 vs. 135 +/- 7 mg/dl; P < 0.01). BW-ADAPTED-T3T4 treatment was associated with additional beneficial effects on ankle reflex time and working memory but resulted in supraphysiological free serum T(3) (fT(3)) levels. LIMITATIONS: Long-term side effects may have been missed. CONCLUSIONS: Using a dose of 1.6 microg/kg bw improved markers commonly associated with central hypothyroidism. This suggests that T(4) dosage based on bw and aiming at fT4 in the upper reference range is superior to titration of T(4) aiming at middle normal fT4 concentrations in those patients.