Pudendal Neuralgia: Two case reports with laparoscopic nerve decompression.

Pudendal neuralgia (PN) is a rare and underestimated condition. The reported incidence by the International Pudendal Neuropathy Association is 1/100000. However, the actual rate may be significantly higher, with a propensity for women. It is most frequently caused by an entrapment of the nerve at the level of the sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligament, also known as pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome. Due to the late diagnosis and inadequate management, pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome often leads to considerable reduction in the quality of life and high health care costs. The diagnosis is made using Nantes Criteria, in conjunction with the patient's clinical history and physical findings. Clinical examination with an accurate assessment of the territory of the neuropathic pain is mandatory to set the therapeutic strategy. The aim of the treatment is to control the symptoms and it usually starts with conservative approaches which include analgesics, anticonvulsants, and muscle relaxants. Surgical nerve decompression can be proposed after failure of conservative management. The laparoscopic approach is a feasible and appropriate technique to explore and decompress the pudendal nerve, and to rule out other pelvic conditions that can cause similar symptomatology. In this paper, the clinical history of two patients affected by compressive PN is reported. Both patients underwent laparoscopic pudendal neurolysis suggesting that the treatment for PN should be individualised and carried out by a multidisciplinary team. When conservative treatment fails, laparoscopic nerve exploration and decompression is an adequate option to propose and should be performed by a trained surgeon.

Colorectal endometriosis: ample data without definitive recommendations.

The preoperative work-up and optimal surgical approach to colorectal endometriosis is a highly studied topic lacking definitive recommendations. Synthesis of the available data can be extremely challenging for surgeons due to the heterogeneity of existing comparisons, a variety of studied surgical outcomes, and a predominant focus on operative complications. While these considerations are extremely important for surgeons performing such complex gynaecologic surgery there is still much to be desired with regards to evidence based guidelines for the preoperative assessment and surgical technique for colorectal endometriosis. Having an established guideline stating in which clinical situations endometriosis surgeons should performing rectovaginal shaving, versus discoid excision, versus segmental resection would be extremely important for all pelvic surgeons, even those operating in high-volume centres dedicated to the surgical management of complex endometriosis. This perspective highlights the shortcomings of the available data and attempts to create an algorithm surgeons can follow when performing surgery for colorectal endometriosis. This algorithm is based on our expert opinion after synthesising available data.

COVID-19: A Surgical Perspective for when the curve flattens.

At the present time it is clear that our global healthcare community was not prepared to face the COVID-19 pandemic. Hospitals in the hardest hit areas have been transformed to COVID centres. Surgical societies have recommended postponing non-emergency surgery, and have given recommendations for triaging the ever- growing backlog of patients. However, simply resuming these non-emergency surgeries may lead the healthcare system into a second disaster. If healthcare policymakers around the world do not systematically consider how to resume normal surgical services, hospitals will be quickly overwhelmed, vital resources will be depleted, and patients and providers alike will face an increased exposure risk. This perspective serves to highlight certain aspects of returning to normal that physicians and hospital administrators alike must consider to avoid potential catastrophe.