ABSTRACT
Patients with chronic kidney disease are at increased risk of tuberculosis. We describe the events that occurred when we encountered a patient receiving haemodialysis with pulmonary tuberculosis. Nine (of 41) patients dialysing at the same time as the index case had a positive interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) and were offered therapy for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Patients with an initial negative IGRA were rescreened at six months, identifying a further three IGRA-positive patients. All patients were then rescreened at 12 months. No new IGRA-positive cases were identified and no staff or patients developed active disease. Only five of the 12 IGRA-positive patients completed LTBI therapy.
Subject(s)
Latent Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Latent Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Mass Screening/methods , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Monitoring/methods , Hemodialysis Units, Hospital , Humans , Interferon-gamma Release Tests , Latent Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Central venous catheter (CVC) placement under ECG guidance in the left thoracocervical area can lead to catheter misplacement. The aim of this study was to identify the cause and quantify the magnitude of this error. METHODS: CVCs were sited in either the left or right internal jugular (IJ), subclavian (SC), or innominate (brachiocephalic) vein using the Seldinger technique and a total of 227 insertions were studied. The position of the catheter tip was confirmed with two different intra-atrial ECG monitoring methods (Seldinger's wire vs 10% saline solution). Measurements were compared between the two methods and correlated to the different access sites. RESULTS: All right-sided CVC had the line tip in the optimal position and both intra-atrial ECG recording by Seldinger's wire or 10% saline delivered correct results. For left-sided lines, however, the two methods gave significantly different results regarding the position of the line tip for each insertion site. When using the Seldinger wire as intravascular ECG lead, the results differed from the saline method by a mean of 21 mm for the IJ and 10 mm for the SC. CONCLUSIONS: CVC placement under ECG guidance is a reliable method to site the line tip at the optimal position. However, when using a left-sided thoracocervical access point, the Seldinger wire-conducted ECG delivered a constant error. This could be adjusted for by advancing the CVC 20 mm in addition to the wire-based measurement of the insertion depth at the left IJ vein and 10 mm at the left SC vein.
Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Electrocardiography/methods , Brachiocephalic Veins , Catheters , Catheters, Indwelling , Female , Humans , Jugular Veins , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Radiography, Thoracic , Respiration, Artificial , Subclavian VeinABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Post-transplant hypertension is a major modifiable risk factor for graft and patient survival. The aim of this study was to establish independent predictors for achieving systolic, diastolic and overall blood pressure target [Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) target blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg] in renal-transplant recipients (RTRs) and to consider whether current management strategies are adequate to achieve this aim. METHODS: The most recent office blood pressure readings were collected for 513 RTRs at least 6 months after transplantation. In addition, demographic data, comorbidities, medications prescribed, weight, duration of transplantation, and laboratory parameters were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether any covariables were significant (p < 0.05) independent predictors of controlled blood pressure (<130/80 mm Hg). RESULTS: Approximately 50% of the RTRs had blood pressures <130/80. There was a marked terminal digit preference demonstrated. Subjects who were female, had diabetes, did not have heart disease or had a lower albumin:creatinine ratio had a higher probability to achieve good blood pressure control. Diabetics were more likely to be prescribed 3 or more antihypertensive agents. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that improvements in blood pressure control can be achieved. People with diabetes were 2.1 times more likely to meet target blood pressure. Further improvements in blood pressure control may require different treatment strategies in addition to the current pharmacological approach.
