ABSTRACT
Poultry is a common reservoir for Campylobacter and a main source for human campylobacteriosis. With broiler being the predominant poultry for food production, most food safety related research is conducted for this species, for turkey, few studies are available. Although animals are typically colonized at the farm level, the slaughtering process is considered an important factor in re- and cross-contamination. We examined the development of Campylobacter, E. coli and total colony counts (TCC) after several processing steps in three broiler and one turkey slaughterhouses. Whole carcass rinsing and neck skin sampling was applied for broilers resulting in 486 samples in total, while 126 neck skin samples were collected for turkeys. A decrease in the loads of the different bacterial groups along the broiler slaughtering process was observed. Campylobacter mean counts dropped from 4.5 ± 1.7 log10 CFU/ml after killing to 1.6 ± 0.4 log10 CFU/ml after chilling. However, an increase in Campylobacter counts was evident after evisceration before the values again decreased by the final processing step. Although the Campylobacter prevalence in the turkey samples showed a similar development, the bacterial loads were much lower with 1.7 ± 0.3 log10 CFU/g after killing and 1.7 ± 0.4 log10 CFU/g after chilling compared to those of broilers. The loads of E. coli and total colony count of turkey were higher after killing, were reduced by scalding and remained stable until after chilling. This study highlights trends during the slaughtering process in reducing the levels of Campylobacter, E. coli, and total colony counts for broiler and turkey carcasses, from the initial step to after chilling. These results contribute to our understanding of microbial dynamics during meat processing.
Subject(s)
Campylobacter , Escherichia coli , Humans , Animals , Chickens/microbiology , Food Microbiology , Abattoirs , Poultry/microbiology , Turkeys , Hygiene , Colony Count, Microbial , Food Handling/methodsABSTRACT
The aim of the study is to provide an up-to date overall evaluation of visual contamination occurring on the slaughter line in order to provide a basis for implementing contamination control measures and to the hygienic quality of the processes. For this purpose, 627 contaminated pig carcasses in an industrial slaughterhouse in north western Germany were examined in 2021 for its distribution of type, areal extent and localization of slaughter contamination. Prior to official meat inspection, two persons visually scanned dorsal and ventral surfaces of the eviscerated but not yet split pig carcasses from cranial to caudal and recorded types, areal extent and localization of the contamination. The main contamination type were intestinal contents, bile, stomach contents, tubular rail fat and "others", which mostly consisted of a reddish foam from the respiratory tract. 103 out of 627 contaminated animals showed more than one contamination, which leads to a total number of 754 contaminations detected. Intestinal contents accounted for almost half of all contaminations and "others" for 30%. Forelimb, back and ham together counted for 70% of the contaminated regions. The affected area was smaller than that of a one euro coin (diameter about 23 mm) in 86% of the cases.
Subject(s)
Abattoirs , Meat , Swine , Animals , Hygiene , Germany , Food Microbiology , Food Contamination/analysisABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate a blood pool contrast agent and water-selective excitation imaging at 3 T for high spatial and high contrast imaging of brain vessels including the veins. METHODS AND RESULTS: 48 clinical patients (47 ± 18 years old) were included. Based on clinical findings, twenty-four patients received a single dose of standard extracellular Gadoterate-meglumine (Dotarem®) and 24 received the blood pool contrast agent Gadofosveset (Vasovist®). After finishing routine MR protocols, all patients were investigated with two high spatial resolution (0.15 mm (3) voxel size) gradient echo sequences in random order in the equilibrium phase (steady-state) as approved by the review board: A standard RF-spoiled gradient-echo sequence (HR-SS, TR/TE 5.1/2.3 msec, FA 30°) and a fat-suppressed gradient-echo sequence with water-selective excitation (HR-FS, 1331 binominal-pulse, TR/TE 8.8/3.8 msec, FA 30°). The images were subjectively assessed (image quality with vessel contrast, artifacts, depiction of lesions) by two investigators and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were compared using the Student's t-test. The image quality and CNR in the HR-FS were significantly superior compared to the HR-SS for both contrast agents (p < 0.05). The CNR was also improved when using the blood pool agent but only to a minor extent while the subjective image quality was similar for both contrast agents. CONCLUSION: The utilized sequence with water-selective excitation improved image quality and CNR properties in high spatial resolution imaging of brain arteries and veins. The used blood pool contrast agent improved the CNR only to a minor extent over the extracellular contrast agent.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carotid-Cavernous Sinus Fistula/diagnosis , Cerebral Arteries/pathology , Cerebral Veins/pathology , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Gadolinium , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Meglumine , Organometallic Compounds , Sinus Thrombosis, Intracranial/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/blood supply , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Video RecordingABSTRACT
Pancreastatin was isolated from porcine pancreas in 1986 and has been shown to inhibit insulin release and exocrine pancreatic secretion in vivo. In the isolated perfused rat pancreas, we investigated its effect on the exocrine pancreas and evaluated its indirect effects mediated via the islet-acinar axis. In the presence of 16.7 mmol/L glucose, 20 pmol/L, 200 pmol/L, and 2 nmol/L pancreastatin reduced insulin release but did not affect exocrine pancreatic secretion stimulated by cholecystokinin (CCK), secretin, or bombesin. Pancreastatin also failed to affect unstimulated exocrine pancreatic secretion. In the presence of 1.7 mmol/L glucose, 200 pmol/L and 2 nmol/L pancreastatin inhibited glucagon release and potentiated CCK-stimulated exocrine pancreatic secretion. Inhibition of glucagon release and augmentation of exocrine pancreatic secretion may be independent phenomena, but they could be linked by the islet-acinar axis. Thus we speculate that a pancreastatin-induced inhibition of glucagon release may indirectly have caused augmentation of exocrine pancreatic secretion.
Subject(s)
Islets of Langerhans/physiology , Pancreas/physiology , Pancreatic Hormones/physiology , Animals , Chromogranin A , Glucagon/metabolism , Glucose/pharmacology , In Vitro Techniques , Insulin/metabolism , Insulin Secretion , Islets of Langerhans/metabolism , Male , Osmolar Concentration , Pancreas/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Sincalide/pharmacology , Stimulation, ChemicalABSTRACT
Pancreastatin (PST), a peptide isolated from porcine pancreas in 1986, has been reported to inhibit insulin and to stimulate glucagon secretion. Since both of these effects have been questioned, we investigated the effect of PST (20, 200, or 2000 pM) on hormone release in the isolated perfused rat pancreas at different glucose levels (1.7, 5.5, 11.1, and 16.7 mM). At 1.7 mM glucose, 20 pM PST had no significant effect on glucagon secretion, whereas 200 pM and 2 nM PST significantly inhibited glucagon release. At a concentration of 5.5 mM glucose, insulin output was not affected by PST in any of the concentrations tested. At 11.1 mM glucose, however, 200 pM and 2 nM PST significantly inhibited insulin output. At 16.7 mM glucose, insulin secretion was significantly reduced by all concentrations of PST tested. Unstimulated exocrine pancreatic secretion was not affected by PST in any of the experimental settings. We conclude that PST inhibits glucagon and insulin secretion dose-dependently, and these effects apparently are glucose-dependent. PST does not influence basal exocrine pancreatic secretion in vitro.