Results of a Study Comparing Glycated Albumin to Other Glycemic Indices.

CONTEXT: Intermediate-term glycemic control metrics fulfill a need for measures beyond hemoglobin A1C. OBJECTIVE: Compare glycated albumin (GA), a 14-day blood glucose measure, with other glycemic indices. DESIGN: 24-week prospective study of assay performance. SETTING: 8 US clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with type 1 (n = 73) and type 2 diabetes (n = 77) undergoing changes to improve glycemic control (n = 98) or with stable diabetes therapy (n = 52). INTERVENTIONS: GA, fructosamine, and A1C measured at prespecified intervals. Mean blood glucose (MBG) calculated using weekly self-monitored blood glucose profiles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: Pearson correlation between GA and fructosamine. Secondary: magnitude (Spearman correlation) and direction (Kendall correlation) of change of glycemic indices in the first 3 months after a change in diabetes management. RESULTS: GA was more concordant (60.8%) with changes in MBG than fructosamine (55.5%) or A1C (45.5%). Across all subjects and visits, the GA Pearson correlation with fructosamine was 0.920. Pearson correlations with A1C were 0.655 for GA and 0.515 for fructosamine (P < .001) and with MBG were 0.590 and 0.454, respectively (P < .001). At the individual subject level, Pearson correlations with both A1C and MBG were higher for GA than for fructosamine in 56% of subjects; only 4% of subjects had higher fructosamine correlations with A1C and MBG. GA had a higher Pearson correlation with A1C and MBG in 82% and 70% of subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with fructosamine, GA correlates significantly better with both short-term MBG and long-term A1C and may be more useful than fructosamine in clinical situations requiring monitoring of intermediate-term glycemic control (NCT02489773).

Efficacy and Tolerability of Exenatide Once Weekly Over 6 Years in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Uncontrolled Open-Label Extension of the DURATION-1 Study.

BACKGROUND: Long-term treatment is necessary to slow the progression of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Here, we examined the safety and efficacy of 6 years of treatment with exenatide once weekly (QW) among patients with T2D in the DURATION-1 trial. METHODS: The study enrolled patients aged ≥16 years with T2D treated primarily with metformin and sulfonylureas. Following 30 weeks of randomized treatment with exenatide QW 2 mg or exenatide twice daily 10 µg, patients entered an uncontrolled, open-label, open-ended study phase in which all patients received exenatide QW 2 mg. Restrictions on concomitant medication use were eased over time. RESULTS: Of the original 295 patients in the intent-to-treat population, 136 (46%) completed 6 years of treatment. Six-year completers had sustained significant improvements from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c; least-squares mean [LSM] change, -1.6%), with 46.3% achieving HbA1c <7.0%, 33.1% achieving HbA1c ≤6.5%, and significant improvements from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (-28 mg/dL) and body weight (-4.2 kg) at 6 years. The 78 completers who added no glucose-lowering medications had numerically greater body weight reductions than the overall cohort (6-year LSM change, -6.1 kg) with more stability over time. No unexpected adverse events were observed during 1202.4 patient-years of exposure. Most minor hypoglycemia events occurred with concomitant sulfonylurea use. CONCLUSIONS: Exenatide QW was associated with clinically significant, sustained improvements in glycemic control and weight in patients who continued therapy for up to 6 years, without unexpected safety findings. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT00308139.