Ureteric stent versus percutaneous nephrostomy for acute ureteral obstruction - clinical outcome and quality of life: a bi-center prospective study.

BACKGROUND: To compare quality of life (QoL) indices between ureteral stent (DJS) and nephrostomy tube (PCN) inserted in the setting of acute ureteral obstruction. METHODS: Prospective bi-centered study. Over the span of 2 years, 45 DJS and 30 PCN patients were recruited. Quality of life was assessed by 2 questionnaires, EuroQol EQ-5D and 'Tube symptoms' questionnaire, at 2 time points (at discharge after drainage and before definitive treatment). RESULTS: Patients' demographics and pre-drainage data were similar. There were no clinically significant differences in patient's recovery between the groups, including post procedural pain, defeverence, returning to baseline renal function, and septic shock complications. More DJS patients presented to the emergency room with complaints related to their procedure compared to PCN patients. At first, DJS patients complained more of urinary discomfort while PCN patients had worse symptoms relating to mobility and personal hygiene, with both groups achieving similar overall QoL score. At second time point, PCN patients' symptoms ameliorated while symptoms in the DJS group remained similar, translating to higher overall QoL score in the PCN group. CONCLUSIONS: The two techniques had a distinct and significantly different impact on quality of life. Over time, PCN patients' symptoms relieve and their QoL improve, while DJS patients' symptoms persist. Specific tube related symptoms, and their dynamics over time, should be a major determinant in choosing the appropriate drainage method, especially when definitive treatment is not imminent.

Testicular prosthesis insertion following testicular loss or atrophy during early childhood--technical aspects and evaluation of patient satisfaction.

INTRODUCTION: The absence of a testis may be a major traumatic experience with possible consequent negative behavioral impact. The current study is aimed to assess young adults who had lost their testicles early in childhood and subsequently underwent testicular prosthesis (TP) implantation at the end of their adolescence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients aged 19.4 years on average underwent TP implantation following testicular loss at early childhood. A postal anonymous questionnaire was sent to the patients and 13 (68%) replied. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 50 months. Sixty-two percent of patients believed TP size were equal or close to the size of their native testicle, while 23% claimed it was too small. Similarly, 54% had the impression its weight was appropriate, while 38% claimed it was too heavy and 38% supposed its location was too high in the scrotum. However, 85% considered it "very comfortable" or "comfortable" and 77% got used to its presence within 1-4 weeks following surgery. All patients precluded any obstacle in intimate relationships. In accordance, all of them would recommend the operation to a friend with a similar problem. CONCLUSIONS: TP implantation in adolescents with an undeveloped scrotum is a highly successful surgical procedure. The operation positively influences self-confidence, inter-personal interactions and intimate relationships.