The Adolescent and Young Adult Needs Assessment & Service Bridge (NA-SB): A single-arm feasibility pilot study.

PURPOSE: In this pilot study, we evaluated the feasibility of implementing the Needs Assessment & Service Bridge (NA-SB)- an intervention to address the pervasive unmet needs of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) during cancer treatment. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods single-arm feasibility pilot study of NA-SB at the North Carolina Basnight Cancer Hospital. Eligible participants were AYAs ages 18-39 in active cancer treatment. After receiving NA-SB, participants completed a postintervention survey assessing their perceptions of NA-SB. We interviewed participating providers to assess their implementation experiences. RESULTS: On average, AYA participants (n = 26) rated NA-SB's feasibility as 4.5/5, its acceptability as 4.5/5, and its appropriateness as 4.4/5. 77% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that their needs were met in the study period. CONCLUSION: This pilot study generated preliminary evidence to establish NA-SB's feasibility as well as proof of concept for the intervention as a viable approach for identifying and addressing AYAs' unmet needs.

Developing a Comprehensive Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Program: Lessons Learned from 7 Years of Growth and Progress.

Purpose: Every year, nearly 100,000 adolescents and young adults (15-39 years, AYAs) are diagnosed with cancer in the United States and many have unmet physical, psychosocial, and practical needs during and after cancer treatment. In response to demands for improved cancer care delivery for this population, specialized AYA cancer programs have emerged across the country. However, cancer centers face multilevel barriers to developing and implementing AYA cancer programs and would benefit from more robust guidance on how to approach AYA program development. Methods: To contribute to this guidance, we describe the development of an AYA cancer program at the University of North Carolina (UNC) Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Results: We summarize the evolution of UNC's AYA Cancer Program since it was established in 2015, offering pragmatic strategies for developing, implementing, and sustaining AYA cancer programs. Conclusion: The development of the UNC AYA Cancer Program since 2015 has generated many lessons learned that we hope may be informative to other cancer centers seeking to build specialized services for AYAs.

Accelerated epigenetic aging and myopenia in young adult cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: Young adult cancer survivors experience early aging-related morbidities and mortality. Biological aging biomarkers may identify at-risk survivors and increase our understanding of mechanisms underlying this accelerated aging. METHODS: Using an observational study design, we cross-sectionally measured DNA methylation-based epigenetic age in young adult cancer survivors at a tertiary, academic state cancer hospital. Participants were a convenience sample of consecutively enrolled survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers treated with either an anthracycline or alkylating agent, and who were at least 3 months post-treatment. Similarly aged healthy comparators were consecutively enrolled. Cancer treatment and treatment intensity were compared to DNA methylation-based epigenetic age and pace of aging. RESULTS: Sixty survivors (58 completing assessments, mean age 20.5 years, range 18-29) and 27 comparators (mean age 20 years, range 17-29) underwent DNA methylation measurement. Survivors were predominantly female (62%) and white (60%) and averaged nearly 6 years post-treatment (range 0.2-25 years). Both epigenetic age (AgeAccelGrim: 1.5 vs. -2.4, p < 0.0001; AgeAccelPheno 2.3 vs. -3.8, p = 0.0013) and pace of aging (DunedinPACE 0.99 vs. 0.83, p < 0.0001) were greater in survivors versus comparators. In case-case adjusted analysis, compared to survivors with normal muscle mass, myopenic survivors had higher AgeAccelGrim (2.2 years, 95% CI 0.02-4.33, p = 0.02), AgeAccelPheno (6.2 years, 2.36-10.09, p < 0.001), and DunedinPACE (0.11, 0.05-0.17, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Epigenetic age is older and pace of aging is faster in young adult cancer survivors compared to noncancer peers, which is evident in the early post-therapy period. Survivors with physiological impairment demonstrate greater epigenetic age advancement. Measures of epigenetic age may identify young adult survivors at higher risk for poor functional and health outcomes.