Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Anim Sci ; 78(4): 1060-6, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10784199

ABSTRACT

A finishing trial and a metabolism trial were conducted to determine the effect of supplemental metabolizable Lys level on finishing calf performance and to estimate the metabolizable Lys requirement of finishing calves. The finishing trial included 60 individually fed crossbred beef steer calves (237 kg; SD = 20 kg) supplemented with either incremental amounts of rumen-protected Lys and Met, or Met alone. Addition of Lys and Met improved gains and efficiencies (quadratic; P < .02) during the first 56 d. There was no response to supplemental Met alone, suggesting that supplemental Lys rather than Met was responsible for the improvement in performance. Using nonlinear analyses to compare gain relative to supplemental Lys intake, maximum gain was determined to be 2.10 kg/d, or .27 kg/d above the zero Lys control, at a supplemental Lys intake of 2.56 g/d. Steers supplemented with 3 and 4 g of Lys had a weight advantage over the control steers of 16 kg at 56 d and 32 kg at the end of the 161-d trial. However, there were no statistical responses to Lys or Met during any periods after 56 d. During a separate metabolism trial, four steers fed the control finishing diet were slaughtered, and abomasal contents were collected for amino acid analyses. The predicted (Level 1 NRC, 1996) metabolizable protein flow to the abomasum for the control diet was 715 g/d, and the predicted Lys flow was 37.9 g/d. A supplemental Lys intake of 2.56 g/d would increase the Lys flow to 40.5 g/d. Feedlot diets low in ruminal escape protein may be deficient in metabolizable Lys, especially early in the feeding period. The metabolizable Lys requirement of steer calves gaining 2.10 kg/d is estimated to be 40.5 g/d.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed , Cattle/growth & development , Diet , Lysine/metabolism , Amino Acids/blood , Animals , Cattle/blood , Dietary Supplements , Lysine/administration & dosage , Rumen/metabolism
2.
J Anim Sci ; 78(1): 199-206, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10682822

ABSTRACT

Two growth studies were conducted to determine the Met and Lys requirements of growing cattle. In each 84-d trial, steer calves were fed individually diets containing 44% sorghum silage, 44% corn cobs, and 12% supplement (DM basis) at an equal percentage of BW. In Trial 1, 95 crossbred steers (251 kg) were supplemented with urea or meat and bone meal (MBM). Incremental amounts of rumen-protected Met were added to MBM to provide 0, .45, .9, 1.35, 3, and 6 g/d metabolizable Met. In Trial 2, 60 steers (210 kg) were supplemented with urea or corn gluten meal (CGM). Incremental amounts of rumen-protected Lys were added to CGM to provide 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 g/d metabolizable Lys. Supplementation with MBM and CGM increased the supply of metabolizable protein to the animal. Steers fed MBM plus 0 Met gained 49 g/d more than steers fed urea, whereas steers fed CGM plus 0 Lys gained 150 g/d more than steers fed urea. Supplementation of rumen-protected Met and Lys improved ADG in steers fed MBM and CGM, respectively (P < .10). Nonlinear analysis, comparing gain vs supplemental Met and Lys intake, predicted supplemental Met and Lys requirements of 2.9 and .9 g/d, respectively. This amount of additional Met promoted .13 kg/ d gain greater than MBM alone, and this amount of additional Lys promoted .10 kg/d gain greater than the CGM alone. Metabolizable Met and Lys requirements were predicted from Level 1 of NRC (1996) calculated metabolizable protein supply, amino acid analysis of abomasal contents, and the maximum response to supplemental AA. Steers gaining .39 kg/d required 11.6 g/ d Met or 3. 1% of the metabolizable protein requirement, whereas steers gaining .56 kg/d required 22.5 g/d Lys or 5.7% of the metabolizable protein requirement.


Subject(s)
Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Cattle/growth & development , Lysine/physiology , Methionine/physiology , Amino Acids/blood , Animal Feed , Animals , Biological Products , Digestion , Male , Meat , Minerals/administration & dosage , Nutritional Requirements , Urea/administration & dosage
3.
J Anim Sci ; 78(1): 207-15, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10682823

ABSTRACT

In situ and digestion studies were conducted to evaluate feather meal (FTH), blood meal (BM), and meat and bone meal (MBM) for escape protein content, amino acid composition of the escape protein, true protein digestibility, and digestibility of the individual amino acids. Following 12 h of ruminal incubation, escape protein values were 73.5, 92.4, and 60.8% of CP for FTH, BM, and MBM, respectively. Blood meal and MBM were poor sources of sulfur amino acids (SAA), whereas FTH was a good source. Most of the SAA of FTH, however, was Cys, with very little Met. True protein digestibilities were not different for the protein sources (P > .15), ranging from 86.7 to 94.0% of the CP. However, digestibilities of the individual amino acids were quite different. Two growth studies were conducted to evaluate FTH as a source of SAA for growing cattle. The first study used 120 steers (228 +/- 15 kg) supplemented with urea, MBM, MBM plus 1% FTH, or MBM plus 2% FTH. Additionally, incremental amounts of rumen-protected Met were added to treatments containing MBM. Supplementation of MBM increased (P < .05) ADG compared with the urea control. Addition of FTH to MBM resulted in a linear (P < .01) increase in ADG. However, addition of rumen-protected Met to MBM plus FTH treatments further improved gains. Although FTH is an effective source of SAA, Met probably was first-limiting. The second study used 90 steers (243 +/- 18 kg) supplemented with BM plus incremental amounts of SAA from either FTH or rumen-protected Met. Addition of SAA improved ADG compared with BM alone (P < .05). Rumen-protected Met as a source of SAA improved ADG compared with FTH (P < .05). The SAA from FTH promoted a gain response equal to 50% of the response obtained with rumen-protected Met. Formulation of ruminant diets for metabolizable amino acids must account for escape value and digestibility of each individual amino acid. Feather meal is an effective source of SAA; however, Cys supplies over five times the amount supplied by Met.


Subject(s)
Amino Acids, Sulfur/metabolism , Animal Feed , Cattle/growth & development , Feathers , Sheep/metabolism , Animals , Dietary Proteins/metabolism , Digestion , Male , Methionine/metabolism , Rumen/metabolism , Urea/metabolism , Weight Gain
4.
J Anim Sci ; 76(7): 1970-5, 1998 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9690654

ABSTRACT

We evaluated feather meal (FTH) and poultry by-product meal (PBM) as complementary protein sources for growing calves. In a replicated 84-d growth trial, individually fed steer calves (n = 120; 252 +/- 24 kg) were supplemented with urea or with graded levels of soybean meal (SBM), FTH, PBM, or 2/3 FTH:1/3 PBM (CP basis). Protein efficiency, calculated as gain above the urea control vs natural protein intake using the slope-ratio technique, was greater for FTH than for SBM, PBM, and 2/3 FTH:1/3 PBM (P < .10). Addition of ruminally protected methionine and lysine did not affect protein efficiency (P > .30) for FTH, PBM, or 2/3 FTH:1/3 PBM. Even though true protein digestibility in the gastrointestinal tract in a trial with lambs was similar (P > .15) for FTH (83.1%) and PBM (91.2%), escape protein was greater for FTH (66.8%) than for PBM (43.6%). Analyses were conducted to estimate intestinal flow of amino acids relative to requirements for live animal gain, and no obvious amino acid deficiencies were present. The lack of a response in protein efficiency to ruminally protected methionine and lysine suggests that FTH and PBM are adequate in these amino acids. Although FTH and PBM are excellent sources of metabolizable protein, there was no complementary response in protein efficiency between them.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed , Cattle/growth & development , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Feathers , Lysine/administration & dosage , Methionine/administration & dosage , Poultry Products , Amino Acids/administration & dosage , Animals , Cattle/physiology , Dietary Proteins/metabolism , Dietary Proteins/standards , Digestion , Male , Random Allocation , Sheep/physiology
5.
J Anim Sci ; 76(5): 1488-98, 1998 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9621958

ABSTRACT

Two receiving and two finishing trials evaluated energy source and escape protein supplementation for calves. In receiving Trial 1, 398 calves (257 +/- 24 kg BW) were used in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Energy sources were dry-rolled corn (DRC) and wet corn gluten feed (WCGF); each was fed without or with supplemental escape protein (EP). Calves fed WCGF gained slower (P < .05) and consumed less DM (P < .01) than calves fed DRC. Feed efficiency improved (P < .10) with EP supplementation. In finishing Trial 1, 240 calves (305 +/- 21 kg BW) were used. The arrangement of treatments was the same as in receiving Trial 1. Calves fed DRC/WCGF tended (P = .15) to be more efficient and consumed less DM (P < .05) than calves fed DRC. In receiving Trial 2, 315 calves (252 +/- 23 kg BW) were fed diets similar to those fed in receiving Trial 1. Calves fed WCGF consumed less DM (P < .01), gained similarly (P > .15), and were more efficient (P < .10) than calves fed DRC. In finishing Trial 2, 320 calves (298 +/- 23 kg BW) were fed diets containing DRC, DRC/WCGF, high-moisture corn (HMC), HMC/WCGF, and DRC/HMC; each was fed without or with supplemental EP. An energy source x protein supplement interaction was detected for gain (P < .05) and efficiency (P < .01). Results suggest that WCGF has a NEg greater than DRC in receiving diets and a NEg similar to that of DRC but lower than that of HMC in finishing diets.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/standards , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle/physiology , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Energy Intake/physiology , Animals , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Digestion , Eating , Glutens/administration & dosage , Health Status , Male , Meat/standards , Morbidity , Random Allocation , Rumen/physiology , Weight Gain , Zea mays
6.
J Anim Sci ; 75(12): 3294-300, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9420004

ABSTRACT

In situ, digestion, and growth studies were conducted to evaluate four meat and bone meals and six poultry by-product meals as sources of escape protein and to predict the first-limiting amino acid for growing calves. Escape protein values, determined by 12-h in situ incubation, ranged from 41.7 to 51.0% of CP for meat and bone meals; poultry by-product meals ranged from 32.0 to 39.8%. True protein digestion in the gastrointestinal tract of lambs differed among protein sources (P < .05), ranging from 79 to 95%. In each of three growth trials, 60 steers (258 +/- 24, 241 +/- 23, and 230 +/- 16 kg for Trials 1, 2, and 3, respectively) were supplemented with 4 of the 10 protein sources along with a urea supplement. Protein sources were fed at 30, 40, 50, and 60% of the supplemental CP, with urea supplying the remainder. Protein efficiency differed among treatments ( P < .10), ranging from .61 to 1.55. Amino acid composition was determined for each protein source, and the individual metabolizable amino acids were regressed on the protein efficiency values. Escape protein values were correlated (R2 = .75) with protein efficiency but had a negative slope. Metabolizable methionine was the only amino acid moderately correlated (R2 = .40, slope = 1.9) to protein efficiency, whereas other amino acids either correlated poorly or had negative slopes. These data indicate that the protein value of meat and bone meal and poultry by-product meal is limited by the amount of metabolizable methionine they contain.


Subject(s)
Amino Acids/analysis , Cattle/growth & development , Diet/veterinary , Meat/analysis , Minerals/chemistry , Poultry Products/analysis , Sheep/growth & development , Amino Acids/metabolism , Animals , Biological Products , Cattle/metabolism , Cattle/physiology , Dietary Proteins/metabolism , Dietary Supplements , Male , Meat/standards , Methionine/metabolism , Minerals/standards , Poultry , Poultry Products/standards , Random Allocation , Regression Analysis , Rumen/metabolism , Sheep/metabolism , Sheep/physiology , Urea/analysis , Urea/metabolism , Weight Gain/physiology
7.
J Anim Sci ; 75(12): 3301-6, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9420005

ABSTRACT

A growth study was conducted to determine the effects of adding ruminal escape methionine and lysine to meat and bone meal (MBM). A basal diet of 44% sorghum silage, 44% corncobs, and 12% supplement (DM basis) was individually fed to 60 crossbred steers (234 +/- 14 kg). Supplements contained either urea, MBM, MBM plus protected methionine (MBM + M), or MBM plus protected methionine and lysine. Protein sources were fed to supply 30, 40, 50, and 60% of the supplemental CP, with urea supplying the remainder. Protein efficiency, calculated as gain above the urea control vs natural protein intake using the slope ratio technique, was used to evaluate the protein sources. The most efficiently used protein source was MBM + M, which was greater than MBM alone (P < .10). Meat and bone meal plus protected methionine and lysine had a protein efficiency similar to MBM + M (P > .30), indicating that lysine was not limiting. True protein digestibility of MBM in the gastrointestinal tract of lambs was determined to be 86.1%. In situ analysis performed by 12-h ruminal incubation of MBM determined the escape CP to be 53.0% of CP. Amino acid analysis was conducted to compare supplies to requirements for live animal gain. The urea control failed to meet the metabolizable protein requirement. Feeding MBM to provide additional metabolizable protein failed to provide an adequate amount of the essential amino acid methionine, which was first-limiting. These data indicate that protein efficiency of MBM can be enhanced by the addition of ruminal escape methionine.


Subject(s)
Cattle/metabolism , Lysine/analysis , Meat/analysis , Methionine/analysis , Minerals/analysis , Rumen/metabolism , Sheep/metabolism , Amino Acids/analysis , Amino Acids/metabolism , Amino Acids, Sulfur/analysis , Amino Acids, Sulfur/metabolism , Animals , Biological Products , Cattle/growth & development , Cattle/physiology , Dietary Proteins/metabolism , Dietary Supplements , Digestion/physiology , Lysine/administration & dosage , Lysine/metabolism , Male , Methionine/administration & dosage , Methionine/metabolism , Random Allocation , Rumen/chemistry , Sheep/growth & development , Sheep/physiology , Time Factors , Weight Gain/physiology , Zea mays/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL