Responsiveness of the Various Short-Form Versions of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Between 2 and 5 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Background: Various short-form versions of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) have been developed in an attempt to minimize responder burden. However, the responsiveness of these short-form measures in patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has not been compared at midterm follow-up. Purpose: To determine the responsiveness of 3 short-form versions of the KOOS (KOOS-12, KOOS-Global, and KOOS-ACL) in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: In 276 patients (149 male, 127 female), we administered the KOOS and a measure of overall knee function at both 2 and 5 years after ACL reconstruction. From the full KOOS, the following short-form versions were calculated: KOOS-12, KOOS-Global, and KOOS-ACL. Responsiveness was assessed using several distribution and anchor-based methods for each of the short-form versions. From distribution statistics the standardized response mean (SRM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) were calculated. Using the anchor-based method, the minimally important change (MIC) that was associated with an improvement in knee function was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: High ceiling effects were present for all measures. KOOS-Global scores increased significantly over time, whereas KOOS-12 and KOOS-ACL did not change. The KOOS-Quality of Life (QOL) subscale, which can be derived from both KOOS-Global and KOOS-12, also increased significantly between assessments. Both these increases were associated with a small (0.2-0.3) SRM. The MIC was smallest for KOOS-Global (3.2 points) and largest for KOOS-QOL (9.4 points), and, for all measures, the MIC was larger than the SDC at a group level. KOOS-Global was the only measure for which the mean difference between the 2- and 5-year assessments exceeded both the SDC (group level) and the MIC. Conclusion: Of the 3 short-form versions of the KOOS currently available, the KOOS-Global had the greatest responsiveness to change between the 2- and 5-year assessments after ACL reconstruction. High ceiling effects were present for all versions.

Effect of Age and Femoral Tunnel Drilling Technique on the Prevalence of Intra-articular Pathology at Both Primary and Revision ACL Reconstruction.

Background: Studies have shown that meniscal and chondral lesions are more common at the time of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) compared with primary surgery; however, few have evaluated the same patients through both primary and revision surgery. Purpose: To describe the prevalence of meniscal and chondral lesions at the time of primary and subsequent revision ACLR and to determine the effect of age and femoral tunnel drilling technique on the development of intra-articular pathology over time. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All patients who had primary and subsequent revision ACLR in the same knee between 1997 and 2022 were identified from a prospectively collated database. The grading of chondral surfaces in each compartment, the presence of any meniscal tears, and treatment performed were recorded. Patients were grouped according to age and femoral tunnel drilling technique to allow subgroup analysis. Results: Overall, 262 patients were included. Median age at primary surgery was 20.2 years. Lateral meniscal tears were more prevalent than medial tears at both primary (34.7% vs 28.2%; P = .11) and revision surgery (44.3% vs 40.8%; P = .43). Chondral lesions were most frequently found on the patella (8.8%) and the medial femoral condyle (MFC; 8.0%) at primary surgery. Between surgeries, new lesions developed most commonly on the MFC (13.0%) and the lateral femoral condyle (LFC; 11.1%). It was significantly more common for lateral meniscal tears treated with repair or left in situ at primary surgery to be healed at the time of revision surgery than medial tears (P = .01). Significantly more patients who had transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel had a new meniscal tear at revision surgery (P = .001). Age did not have a significant influence on the prevalence of meniscal pathology. Conclusion: The prevalence of intra-articular pathology increased between primary and revision ACLR. Lateral meniscal tears were more prevalent than medial tears at both surgeries. At revision surgery, new chondral lesions were more commonly found on the MFC than the LFC. The higher incidence of new meniscal tears observed in the transtibial group may reflect the more vertical graft orientation with this technique and its inferior ability to control rotation.

The Resolution of Kaplan Fiber Injuries Is Observed in a Majority of Cases at 9 Months After Acute Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Radiological Study.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of Kaplan fiber (KF) injuries after acute primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) remains unknown. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the temporal change in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of the KF complex after acute primary ACLR. It was hypothesized that KF injuries would resolve with time. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A retrospective MRI analysis was conducted on 89 patients with ACL-injured knees to assess the change in the radiological appearance of KFs after primary ACLR. Patients who had undergone index MRI and ACLR within 90 days of the injury and further MRI at 9 months after surgery were included. Diagnostic criteria to identify radiological evidence of a KF injury and its subsequent resolution were applied, including the presence of high signal intensity on fluid-sensitive sequences, which is indicative of a pathological process radiologically. The proximity of KFs to the femoral cortical suspensory device (CSD) was noted on MRI scans and quantified in millimeters. RESULTS: A KF injury was identified in 30.3% (27/89) of patients, with isolated high signal intensity observed in an additional 18.0% (16/89). At 9 months, MRI evidence of the reconstitution of the KF complex was found in 51.9% (14/27) of patients, with persistent discontinuity in the remaining patients (13/27). All patients (16/16) with isolated high signal intensity had complete resolution on repeat MRI scans. KF thickening was observed in 26.1% (12/46) of patients with previously healthy KFs and in 25.0% (4/16) with isolated high signal intensity. The CSD was positioned in close proximity (≤6 mm) to the center of the KF attachment in 61.8% (55/89) of patients, and this was associated with increased rates of KF thickening. CONCLUSION: The KF injury resolved radiologically in over half of the patients at 9 months after acute primary ACLR. High signal intensity in the region of the KFs on index MRI scans resolved in all cases, with evidence of residual KF thickening in only one-quarter of cases on repeat MRI scans, equivalent to the rate in those with healthy KFs. As such, it is not advisable to use high signal intensity on preoperative MRI scans as the sole criterion for the diagnosis of a KF injury. The position of the CSD after ACLR was intimately related to the KF attachment in the majority of patients, which was associated with KF thickening on postoperative MRI scans.

Comparison of Return-to-Sports Rates Between Male and Female Australian Athletes After ACL Reconstruction.

Background: Return to sports (RTS) is a goal for most patients who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Although it has been reported that women RTS at a significantly lower rate compared with men, demographic and contextual factors that may be associated with this have not been investigated. Purpose: To compare RTS rates between men and women and investigate factors that may be associated with different rates of RTS in an Australian context. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 1338 patients who underwent primary ACLR between January 2014 and December 2017 were invited to complete a detailed sports participation questionnaire 2 to 7 years after surgery. RTS rates were calculated and compared between men and women overall and after stratifying by age at surgery (<20, 20-29, 30-39, or ≥40 years) and geographical location (metropolitan or rural). Contingency analysis was performed to compare factors associated with rates of RTS. Results: The survey completion rate was 81% (1080/1338). Overall, women had a significantly lower RTS rate compared with men (65.4% vs 74.9%; P = .001). However, when patients were grouped by age, the lower rate of RTS for women was significant only in the 20- to 29-year age group (P = .01). For athletes who returned to sports, there was no sex-based difference when comparing the levels of RTS. When grouping patients based on geographical location, there was a significantly lower rate of RTS in metropolitan-based women compared with metropolitan-based men (P < .001) and rural-based women (P = .042). Conclusion: Although women returned to sports at a lower rate than men overall, this difference was predominantly seen in the 20- to 29-year age bracket and in those who lived in metropolitan areas. There was no difference between men and women regarding the RTS level.

Impact of Occupation on 12-Month Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Male Patients.

Background: The impact of a physically demanding occupation on clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is largely unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of occupation on 12-month outcomes after ACLR in male patients. It was hypothesized that patients undertaking manual work would not only have better functional outcomes in terms of strength and range of motion but also higher rates of joint effusion and greater anterior knee laxity. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: From an initial cohort of 1829 patients, we identified 372 eligible patients aged 18 to 30 years who underwent primary ACLR between 2014 and 2017. Based on a preoperative self-assessment, 2 groups were established: patients engaged in heavy manual occupations and those engaged in low-impact occupations. Data were collected from a prospective database including effusion, knee range of motion (using side-to-side difference), anterior knee laxity, limb symmetry index for single hop and triple hop, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, and complications up to 12 months. Because of the significantly lower rate of female patients undertaking heavy manual occupations compared to low-impact occupations (12.5% and 40.0%, respectively), data analysis was focused on male patients. Outcome variables were assessed for normality, and statistical comparisons were made between the heavy manual and low-impact groups using either an independent-samples t test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Of 230 male patients, 98 were included in the heavy manual occupation group, and 132 were included in the low-impact occupation group. Patients in the heavy manual occupation group were significantly younger than those in the low-impact occupation group (mean age, 24.1 vs 25.9 years, respectively; P < .005). There was a greater range of active and passive knee flexion in the heavy manual occupation group than in the low-impact occupation group (mean active, 3.38° vs 5.33°, respectively [P = .021]; mean passive, 2.76° vs 5.00°, respectively [P = .005]). There was no difference in effusion, anterior knee laxity, limb symmetry index, IKDC score, return-to-sport rate, or graft rupture rate at 12 months. Conclusion: At 12 months after primary ACLR, male patients engaged in heavy manual occupations had a greater range of knee flexion, with no difference in the effusion rate or anterior knee laxity, compared with those engaged in low-impact occupations.

Effect of Radiological Evidence of Kaplan Fiber Injury on the Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: A paucity of information is available regarding the clinical outcomes of patients with radiological evidence of Kaplan fiber (KF) injury who undergo anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to compare clinical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing acute primary ACLR with and without magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of KF injury. The hypothesis was that there would be no difference in clinical or functional outcomes in patients with versus those without radiological evidence of KF injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: MRI analysis was conducted on patients in a longitudinal prospective study of ACL injury. Only patients who had an MRI scan and had undergone isolated primary ACLR within 60 days of injury were included. MRI was performed using standard knee protocols, and diagnostic criteria were applied to identify KF injury. A total of 32 patients with KF injury (mean age, 24.2 years; 21 male, 11 female) were identified and matched for sex, age, graft type, and preinjury activity with 90 patients who had intact KF. Patients were followed up at 12 months with KT-1000 arthrometer measurements of side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity, single- and triple-hop limb symmetry index (LSI), Marx activity and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, and return to sport (RTS) rates at 12 months and 24 months. RESULTS: No differences were found in anterior knee laxity and single- and triple-hop LSI values between the KF-intact and KF-injured cohorts at 12 months. No differences in Marx and IKDC scores were found between the groups at 12 months and 2 years. The overall rate of RTS within 24 months was 75% (92/122), and 5 patients (2 KF-injured; 3 KF-intact) had a subsequent graft rupture. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in clinical or functional outcomes in patients with and without radiological evidence of KF injury who underwent acute primary ACLR. Based on these findings, the radiological presence of KF injury at the time of acute ACL injury should not be regarded as a risk factor for a negative prognosis after ACLR.

Is There an Association in Young Patients Between Quadriceps or Hamstring Strength After ACL Reconstruction and Graft Rupture?

Background: Younger patients who sustain anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are at high risk for reinjury after ACL reconstruction. Restoring muscle strength before return to sports (RTS) is regarded as an important factor in reducing the reinjury risk, and quadriceps and hamstring strength assessment is commonly included in RTS testing. However, it is not clear whether reduced strength is a risk factor for subsequent graft rupture in this patient population. Purpose: To investigate the association between quadriceps and hamstring strength at 12 months after primary ACL reconstruction and ACL graft rupture in young patients. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The cohort consisted of 210 patients (100 men and 110 women) who were younger than 20 years at the time of primary ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft and who had no previous contralateral ACL injury. Isokinetic strength testing (60 and 180 deg/s) of knee flexors and extensors was performed at 12 months postoperatively, and the limb symmetry index (LSI) for each strength outcome was calculated. RTS rates and the incidence of further ACL graft ruptures were recorded. Results: Measures of central tendency (mean and median) of LSI values ranged from 88 to 98. The percentage of patients with LSI ≥90 was 57% to 69% for quadriceps strength and 45% to 47% for hamstring strength. Overall, 19 patients (9%) sustained an ACL graft rupture. No significant differences were found between the patients who sustained an ACL graft rupture and those who did not in terms of quadriceps and hamstring strength at 12 months. No significant associations were found between achieving LSI ≥90 for quadriceps peak torque and subsequent ACL graft rupture. Conclusion: In young patients who underwent an ACL reconstruction, no association was noted between quadriceps and hamstring strength at 12 months postoperatively and subsequent graft ruptures. The role of strength testing as part of the RTS criteria after ACL reconstruction, and specifically the use of limb symmetry thresholds, warrants further investigation and clarification.

Choice of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Midterm Assessment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become increasingly popular for assessing subjective elements of a patient's condition. Two frequently used knee-related PROMs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery are the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). However, completing the full versions of both measures represents a considerable responder burden. PURPOSE: To compare a variety of KOOS short forms with each other as well as the IKDC-SKF in a large sample of ACLR patients between 2 and 6 years after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: The KOOS and IKDC-SKF were administered between 2 and 6 years (mean, 3 years) after ACLR surgery to a cohort of 832 patients (men, n = 489; women, n = 343). Two single-item assessment numerical evaluations were also completed for knee function and satisfaction. The following short form versions were calculated from the full KOOS: the KOOS-12 short form, KOOS-Physical Function Short form (KOOS-PS), KOOS-Joint Replacement Short form (KOOS-JR), and KOOS-Global. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all PROMs and associations between measures were explored using nonparametric (Spearman rho) correlations. Floor or ceiling effects were considered present if >15% of patients reported the worst (floor effect) or best (ceiling effect) possible score. Age and sex comparisons were also made for each PROM. RESULTS: Ceiling effects were present for all KOOS short form versions. They were highly evident for the KOOS-JR and KOOS-PS (37%-44%), but they were only marginally above the threshold for the KOOS-12 and KOOS-Global (16%). The KOOS-12 and KOOS-Global had the highest correlation with the IKDC-SKF but only explained 58% to 59% of the variance in scores. The KOOS-12 and KOOS-Global were very highly correlated (ρ = 0.98). Only moderate correlations were seen between the single-item assessments and the IKDC-SKF or various KOOS short forms. There was a negligible association between patient age and PROM scores, but there was no significant sex difference for any of the PROMs. CONCLUSION: The IKDC-SKF together with either the KOOS-Global or KOOS-12 may provide a comprehensive range of knee-related PROMs with minimized responder burden at 2 to 6 years after ACLR.

Rates and Determinants of Returning to Australian Rules Football in Male Nonprofessional Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Return to sport is a goal for most patients who undergo anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, at a nonelite level, there are limited sport-specific data regarding rates or factors associated with return to play. PURPOSE: To report rates and determinants of returning to play Australian Rules football after ACL reconstruction in male nonprofessional athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Case-series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 354 male nonprofessional Australian Rules football players who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction were asked to complete detailed sports activity questions at 12 months and 2 to 5 years (mean, 3 years) after surgery. Rates of return to play were calculated for both timepoints, along with preoperative patient expectations and postoperative sport performance. The following predictors of return to play were examined: age at surgery; height; weight; frequency of weekly football participation; sport participation level; psychological readiness to return to sport; and knee-related quality of life. Further ACL injuries were also documented. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize return-to-play data and contingency analysis for predictors of return to sport. RESULTS: The rate of return to any level of play was 35% (95% CI, 30%-41%; n = 284) at the 12-month follow-up and 78% (95% CI, 72%-83%; n = 233) at the 2- to 5-year follow-up. Overall, 64% (95% CI, 57%-70%) of the patients were able to return to their same or higher level of play. Before surgery, 92% of the patients expected to return to their same preinjury level of Australian Rules football participation. At the 2- to 5-year follow-up, 61% who returned to play felt that they could perform as well as they could before their ACL injury. A greater psychological readiness to return to sport preoperatively and higher level of sport participation were significant predictors of a return at 2 to 5 years. Further ACL injuries were sustained by 21% of the cohort (15% graft rupture; 6% contralateral ACL injury). CONCLUSION: Most male athletes who participate in Australian Rules football returned to some level of play after ACL reconstruction; however, only 64% returned to preinjury levels. Preoperative expectations were not met, and high reinjury rates are a cause for concern.

Effect of COVID-19 Social Isolation Policies on Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a profound impact on health care in Australia. To contain the spread of the virus, strict physical distancing and social isolation policies were implemented from late March 2020. This presented a situation in which patients recovering from anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction had limited access to face-to-face supervised rehabilitation and rehabilitation facilities. PURPOSE: To explore the impact of social distancing and isolation policies on postoperative rehabilitation in patients after ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who had ACL reconstruction from October 2019 until the end of March 2020 (6 months before the implementation of COVID-19 restrictions) completed an online self-report questionnaire containing 5 sections: utilization of health care professionals for rehabilitation, frequency of rehabilitation, patient concerns and attitude, perceived impact on recovery, and changes to employment status. We compared the responses of patients who had surgery in 2019 with those who had surgery in 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using frequency statistics and central tendency measures. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients (97 men, 88 women) completed the survey, for a 73% response rate. Patients had a mean age of 28 years (range, 13-57 years) and had undergone surgery a mean 4.5 months prior (range, 1.5-8 months). Most patients (80%) maintained face-to-face rehabilitation, predominantly with a physical therapist, regardless of whether their surgery took place in 2019 or 2020; rehabilitation with active, supervised exercises was most common. Almost all patients were performing strengthening exercises (164/185), and most were performing range-of-motion (139/185) and aerobic (123/185) activities at their homes. Patients were minimally concerned about access to supervised rehabilitation and knee reinjury, but they were concerned about access to equipment. Because of COVID-19, 30% were working from home; 17% were on reduced hours and 8% on increased hours; 15% were on leave or unemployed; and 30% reported no change in employment status. CONCLUSION: Patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction just before or during the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic were able to maintain in-person contact with their health professionals during rehabilitation, and they had a positive outlook and managed well despite the restrictions.

Effect of Time on MRI Appearance of Graft After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparison of Autologous Hamstring and Quadriceps Tendon Grafts.

BACKGROUND: After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), changes in the appearance of the ACL graft can be monitored using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the MRI signal intensity (SI) of hamstring and quadriceps tendon grafts during the first postoperative year after ACLR. As a secondary aim, the relationship of SI to clinical and anatomic measurements was analyzed. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 78 patients who underwent ACLR with an autologous graft were reviewed; 55 received hamstring grafts and 23 received quadriceps tendon grafts. At 3 and 9 months postoperatively, 3-T MRI was performed using a dedicated knee coil, and the median SI of the intra-articular ACL graft was measured on sagittal-plane images. Postoperative lateral radiographs were analyzed to determine medial and lateral posterior tibial slope (PTS). Side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity between injured and uninjured limbs was measured at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The median SI of quadriceps grafts was significantly greater than hamstring grafts at 3 months after ACLR (P = .02). Between 3 and 9 months, the median SI of quadriceps grafts decreased (P < .001), while that of hamstring grafts did not significantly change (P = .55). The lateral PTS was significantly correlated with median SI measurements at 3 and 9 months such that greater lateral PTS values were associated with greater median SI. The side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity decreased for the quadriceps group (P = .04) between 6 and 12 months but did not change for the hamstring group (P = .88). CONCLUSION: The median SI of quadriceps grafts significantly decreased on MRI between 3 and 9 months after ACLR, while the median SI of hamstring grafts did not significantly change. The change in MRI appearance of the quadriceps grafts was paralleled by a reduction in anterior knee laxity between 6 and 12 months after surgery. In the absence of standardized imaging techniques and imaging analysis methods, the role of MRI in determining graft maturation, and the implications for progression through rehabilitation to return to sport, remain uncertain.

Augmentation of Primary ACL Reconstruction With a Modified Ellison Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in High-Risk Patients: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has been used to augment primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to reduce the risk of reinjury. Most LET procedures result in a construct that is fixed to both the femur and the tibia. In a modified Ellison procedure, the construct is only fixed distally, reducing the risk of inadvertently overconstraining the lateral compartment. PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the modified Ellison procedure in a cohort of patients deemed to be at a high risk of further ACL injury after primary ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Included were 25 consecutive patients with at least 2 of the following risk factors: age <20 years at the time of surgery, previous contralateral ACL reconstruction, positive family history of ACL rupture (parent or sibling), generalized ligamentous laxity (Beighton ≥4), grade 3 pivot shift in the consulting room, a desire to return to a pivoting sport, and an elite or professional status. All patients underwent primary ACL reconstruction with an additional modified Ellison procedure. Postoperatively, patients completed the IKDC subjective knee evaluation form (International Knee Documentation Committee), KOOS Quality of Life subscale (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), ACL-Return to Sport After Injury Scale, Marx Activity Rating Scale, and SANE score (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation). RESULTS: At 12-month follow-up, the mean outcome scores were as follows: SANE, 94/100; IKDC, 92/100; Marx, 13/16; ACL-Return to Sport, 85/100; and KOOS, 77/100. At 24 months, return-to-sport data were available for 23 of 25 patients; 17 (74%) were playing at the same level or higher than preinjury and 2 at a lower level. One patient (4%) sustained a contact mechanism graft rupture at 12 months. There were 2 (9%) contralateral ACL injuries, including 1 ACL graft rupture, at 11 and 22 months postoperatively. There was a further contralateral ACL graft rupture at 26 months. CONCLUSION: The use of the modified Ellison procedure as a LET augmentation of a primary ACL reconstruction to produce a low graft rupture rate appeared to be safe in a cohort considered to be at a high risk of reinjury. The procedure showed promise in terms of reducing further graft injuries.

Preservation of the Tibial Stump During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Did Not Increase the Rate of Surgery for Symptomatic Cyclops Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Preservation of the tibial stump during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is controversial. While proposed benefits include enhanced graft revascularization, improved proprioception, and decreased graft rupture rates, a potential complication is the development of a symptomatic cyclops lesion. It is therefore important to determine whether any benefits outweigh potential complications. PURPOSE: To determine whether greater preservation of the tibial stump remnant would be associated with a decreased graft rupture rate without a concomitant increase in the rate of surgery for symptomatic cyclops lesions at 2 years after ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A cohort of 658 patients in whom the amount of tibial stump preserved was classified as no stump (n = 228), <50% (n = 342), or >50% (n = 88) was followed up for 2 years, with graft ruptures and surgical treatment for cyclops lesions recorded. Contingency and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to determine trends among the 3 remnant preservation groups in terms of graft rupture rates and surgery for cyclops lesions. Subgroup analysis was also conducted to examine sex-based differences. RESULTS: There was no significant association between graft rupture rates and remnant preservation. There was a significant trend for fewer operations for symptomatic cyclops lesions with greater remnant preservation when the entire cohort was analyzed (P = .04) and also when only female patients were analyzed (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Although preservation of the tibial stump remnant was not associated with a reduced graft rupture rate, it was also not associated with increased rates of surgery for symptomatic cyclops lesions.

Second ACL Injury Rates in Younger Athletes Who Were Advised to Delay Return to Sport Until 12 Months After ACL Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Younger patients are at increased risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft rupture and contralateral injury after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Increasing the amount of time between surgery and the resumption of competitive sport may reduce this risk. PURPOSE: To determine the rates of graft rupture and injury to the contralateral native ACL at 3- to 5-year follow-up in younger patients who were advised to delay a return to competitive sport until 12 months after surgery and compare this with a nondelayed cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The primary study cohort consisted of 142 eligible patients aged <20 years when they underwent their first primary ACLR. All were informed about the risk of further injury and advised not to return to competitive sport before 12 months postoperatively. Return-to-sport status and the number of subsequent ACL injuries (graft rupture or a contralateral injury to the native ACL) were determined at 3- to 5-year follow-up and compared with a historic cohort of 299 patients with ACLR who were not advised to delay their return to sport for a set period. The cohorts were then combined, and injury rates were compared between those who returned to sport before and after 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The follow-up rate was 91% (129/142). In the delayed cohort, 63% returned to competitive sport after 12 months (mean, 14 months). Few patients (n = 10) returned before 9 months. In the delayed group, 33% had a subsequent ACL injury; this was not significantly different when compared with the nondelayed group (31% rate), in which a majority (58%) returned to competitive sport before 12 months. Subsequent ACL injury rates were also similar when compared between patients who returned before and after 12 months postoperatively (33% vs 32%, respectively). CONCLUSION: At midterm follow-up, the overall rates of subsequent ACL injury were high, even for patients who delayed their return until 12 months after surgery. More research is required to identify strategies to reduce the high reinjury rate in younger athletes.

Primary ACL reconstruction using the LARS device is associated with a high failure rate at minimum of 6-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS®) is a synthetic ligament consisting of fibres made of polyethylene terephthalate. Despite the LARS being used as an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) device for nearly 30 years and the well-documented complications from earlier synthetic ligament designs, there is a paucity of published medium- to long-term results. The aim of this study is to report the clinical and functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction using the LARS at a minimum follow-up of 6 years. METHODS: Results of a single surgeon's entire cohort of 55 patients who underwent primary LARS ACL surgery were reviewed at a median of 7.8 years (6.0-9.4). Patient-reported outcome measures including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were collected and clinical assessment consisted of range of motion (ROM) and the KT-1000 arthrometer to assess the side-side difference in the operative and non-operative knee. Mechanical failures of the graft were confirmed at revision surgery and a survivorship analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The overall mechanical failure rate was 17/51 (33.3%) with ruptures occurring at a median 3.9 years (0.6-8.8 years) following primary LARS ACL surgery. Secondary operative procedures were performed in 39.2% of patients. For intact grafts, there was no statistically significant difference is side-to-side ROM or anterior knee laxity and subjective scores revealed a median IKDC subjective score of 85.1 (26.4-100) and SF-36 physical component score of 94.1. CONCLUSION: The rates of LARS ACL construct failure (33.3%) in this cohort are high and based on these results the LARS should not be considered as a graft option for primary ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, cohort study.

Comparison of the Source and Quality of Information on the Internet Between Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Australian Experience.

BACKGROUND: The internet is a valuable tool, but concerns exist regarding the quality and accuracy of medical information available online. PURPOSE: To evaluate the source and quality of information on the internet relating to anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) compared with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to 50 ACLR patients in Australia to determine their use of the internet to research their operation and their familiarity with the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee. The most common search terms were determined, and the first 70 websites returned by the 5 most popular search engines were used to assess the quality of information about ACLR and ALLR. Each site was categorized by type and was assessed for quality and validity using the DISCERN score, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and a novel specific content score for each procedure. The presence of the Health on the Net Code (HONcode) seal was also recorded. RESULTS: The majority (84%) of ACLR patients used the internet to research their operation. The quality of information available for ALLR was significantly inferior to that for ACLR according to the DISCERN score (37.3 ± 3.4 vs 54.4 ± 4.6; P < .0001) and specific content score (5.3 ± 1.3 vs 11.0 ± 1.5; P < .0001). ACLR websites were predominantly physician produced, while the majority of ALLR websites were academic. In contrast to ACLR websites, the majority of ALLR websites did not provide information on the indication for treatment or potential complications. ALLR websites scored better on the JAMA benchmark criteria due to the predominance of academic websites. A greater proportion of ACLR websites (14.6%) versus ALLR websites (2.5%) provided an HONcode seal. Correlation was demonstrated between the DISCERN score and specific content scores for both ACLR and ALLR but not with JAMA benchmark criteria. The specific content score had high reliability for both ACLR and ALLR. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients undergoing ACLR in Australia used the internet to research the procedure. The quality of information on the internet relating to ALLR was significantly inferior to information about ACLR. Most ALLR websites failed to include crucial information about the indication or options for treatment, prognosis, and potential complications. Surgeons should be aware of the information to which their patients are exposed through the internet and should be proactive in directing patients to appropriate websites.