ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Trauma is a leading cause of injury and mortality and may involve mandibular fractures and cervical spine injuries. Manipulation of the spine during trauma protocols and operative treatment has the potential to cause serious spinal cord injuries. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors associated with cervical spine injury (CSI) in patients with mandibular fractures. METHODS: The National Trauma Databank (2007-2010) was used to identify patients with mandibular fractures. RESULTS: A total of 59,028 patients were identified and separated into adult and pediatric cohorts. There were 50,711 adults (86%) and 8317 children (14%). There were statistically significant lower rates of associated CSI in pediatric patients than adults (3.5% versus 7.3%, P < 0.01). Predictors of associated CSI in mandible fractures for both adults and children were older age, lower Glasgow Coma Scale, thoracic injuries, firearm or motor vehicle accident mechanisms, and symphyseal fractures. In the pediatric cohort, body, ramus, and subcondylar fractures were significantly associated with CSI. In adults, female gender, and upper extremity, abdominopelvic, and head injuries were also significantly associated with CSI. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple mandibular fractures were inversely correlated with CSI. One possibility is that energy dissipation in the mandible with multiple fractures is protective of the C-spine leading to fewer fractures. Children and adults had different associations in the pattern of mandible fractures concomitant with CSI. This has implications in management, imaging, and workup of trauma patients.
Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Mandibular Fractures/complications , Multiple Trauma/etiology , Spinal Injuries/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Injuries/diagnosis , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The authors present a prospective, randomized, blinded trial comparing the educational efficacy of digital animation versus a textbook in teaching the Ivy loop technique to novice learners. METHODS: Medical student volunteers (n = 32) were anonymously videotaped as they fastened dental wire to the teeth of a skull model (preintervention analysis) and then were randomly assigned to one of two study groups. The animation and text groups (n = 16 each) were shown either a digital animation or textbook demonstrating the Ivy loop surgical technique. Volunteers were then videotaped as they performed the technique (postintervention analysis). Volunteers were then shown the educational material provided to the other study group and given a validated educational survey to compare the educational value of both materials. Preintervention and postintervention video recordings were graded using a validated surgical competency scale. Surgical performance grades, time to task completion, and educational survey scores were compared. RESULTS: Preintervention analysis performance scores did not significantly differ between the animation and text groups (10.7 [2.8] versus 11.1 [3.9]; p = 0.74), but postintervention analysis demonstrated significantly higher performance scores in the animation group (18.8 [2.9] versus 13.0 [3.5]; p < 0.001). Time to task completion was similar. The educational survey demonstrated significantly higher scores in the animation group. CONCLUSIONS: A prospective, randomized, blinded study comparing the educational efficacy of a surgical textbook to digital animation demonstrates that, in novice learners, digital animation is a more effective tool for learning the Ivy loop technique. Test takers found digital animation to be the superior educational medium.
Subject(s)
Computer-Assisted Instruction/instrumentation , Education, Medical/methods , Oral Surgical Procedures/methods , Students, Medical , Surgery, Plastic/education , Teaching Materials , Video Recording/methods , Double-Blind Method , Educational Measurement , Humans , Prospective Studies , Reference Values , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
The calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC), first identified as a separate and distinct lesion by Gorlin et al. in 1962, is an uncommon benign lesion, consisting of a proliferation of odontogenic epithelium and scattered nests of ghost cells and calcifications that may form the lining of a cyst or present as a solid mass. The COC occurs alone or occasionally with odontomas or other odontogenic tumors, and it is this variable histology and clinical behavior that has raised the question of whether or not it is a cyst or a true neoplasm. The odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) is a locally aggressive odontogenic cyst lined by parakeratinizing epithelium that also exhibits characteristics of a neoplasm, including rapid growth, a high rate of recurrence when treated conservatively, and the presence of a gene mutation. We describe a patient diagnosed with an OKC of the mandible that arose simultaneously with a COC of the anterior maxilla. The occurrence of 2 "cystic neoplasms" in the same patient is an occurrence which to our knowledge has not been previously reported. We discuss the significance of the case and review the current literature regarding these lesions.
