Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Immunother Cancer ; 11(9)2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37730278

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant therapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) or BRAF/MEK-directed targeted therapy (TT) improves recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients with advanced, BRAFV600-mutant (BRAFmut) resected melanoma. However, 40% of these patients will develop distant metastases (DM) within 5 years, which require systemic therapy. Little data exist to guide the choice of upfront adjuvant therapy or treatment management upon DM. This study evaluated the efficacy of subsequent treatments following tumor recurrence upon upfront adjuvant therapy. METHODS: For this multicenter cohort study, we identified 515 BRAFmut patients with resected stage III melanoma who were treated with PD-1 inhibitors (anti-PD1) or TT in the adjuvant setting. Disease characteristics, treatment regimens, details on tumor recurrence, subsequent treatment management, and survival outcomes were collected within the prospective, real-world skin cancer registry ADOReg. Primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) following DM and best tumor response to first-line (1L) treatments. RESULTS: Among 515 eligible patients, 273 patients received adjuvant anti-PD1 and 242 adjuvant TT. At a median follow-up of 21 months, 54.6% of anti-PD1 patients and 36.4% of TT patients recurred, while 39.6% (anti-PD1) and 29.3% (TT) developed DM. Risk of recurrence was significantly reduced in patients treated with TT compared with anti-PD1 (adjusted HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.68, p<0.001). Likewise, median RFS was significantly longer in TT-treated patients (31 vs 17 months, p<0.001). Patients who received TT as second adjuvant treatment upon locoregional recurrence had a longer RFS2 as compared with adjuvant CPI (41 vs 6 months, p=0.009). Patients who recurred at distant sites following adjuvant TT showed favorable response rates (42.9%) after switching to 1L ipilimumab+nivolumab (ipi+nivo). Patients with DM during adjuvant anti-PD1 achieved response rates of 58.7% after switching to 1L TT and 35.3% for 1L ipi+nivo. Overall, median PFS was significantly longer in patients who switched treatments for stage IV disease (median PFS 9 vs 5 months, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: BRAFmut melanoma patients who developed DM upon upfront adjuvant therapy achieve favorable tumor control and prolonged PFS after switching treatment modalities in the first-line setting of stage IV disease. Patients with locoregional recurrence benefit from complete resection of recurrence followed by a second adjuvant treatment with TT.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Cohort Studies , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Prospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/genetics , Registries , Adjuvants, Immunologic
2.
Dermatologie (Heidelb) ; 74(9): 678-686, 2023 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37638989

ABSTRACT

Eczema encompass a wide range of dermatoses that can affect elderly patients in particular. Common differential diagnoses in elderly patients include asteatotic eczema, late-onset atopic dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, early phases of mycosis fungoides, eczematous and pruriginous variants of premonitory bullous pemphigoid, as well as eczematized scabies and post-scabietic eczema. Given the partly overlapping clinical presentations, accurate diagnosis plays a crucial role in the management of these conditions. Therapeutic options depend on the underlying disease and necessitate an individualized approach. This review presents relevant types of eczema in older adults together with diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. In addition to confirming the diagnosis and selecting the appropriate treatment, aspects relevant to the care of older patients should be incorporated into the tailored therapeutic approach.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Atopic , Eczema , Mycosis Fungoides , Scabies , Skin Neoplasms , Aged , Humans , Eczema/diagnosis
3.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(13)2023 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37444540

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tebentafusp has recently been approved for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) after proving to have survival benefits in a first-line setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed the outcomes and safety of tebentafusp therapy in 78 patients with mUM. RESULTS: Patients treated with tebentafusp had a median PFS of 3 months (95% CI 2.7 to 3.3) and a median OS of 22 months (95% CI 10.6 to 33.4). In contrast to a published Phase 3 study, our cohort had a higher rate of patients with elevated LDH (65.4% vs. 35.7%) and included patients with prior systemic and local ablative therapies. In patients treated with tebentafusp following ICI, there was a trend for a longer median OS (28 months, 95% CI 26.9 to 29.1) compared to the inverse treatment sequence (24 months, 95% CI 13.0 to 35.0, p = 0.257). The most common treatment-related adverse events were cytokine release syndrome in 71.2% and skin toxicity in 53.8% of patients. Tumor lysis syndrome occurred in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this real-life cohort showed a median PFS/OS similar to published Phase 3 trial data. Treatment with ICI followed by tebentafusp may result in longer PFS/OS compared to the inverse treatment sequence.

4.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(5): 894-906, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36433688

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibodies and BRAF + MEK inhibitors are widely used for adjuvant therapy of fully resected high-risk melanoma. Little is known about treatment efficacy outside of phase III trials. This real-world study reports on clinical outcomes of modern adjuvant melanoma treatment in specialized skin cancer centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective study investigating stage III-IV melanoma patients receiving adjuvant nivolumab (NIV), pembrolizumab (PEM) or dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) between 1/2017 and 10/2021. The primary endpoint was 12-month recurrence-free survival (RFS). Further analyses included descriptive and correlative statistics, and a multivariate linear-regression machine learning model to assess the risk of early melanoma recurrence. RESULTS: In total, 1198 patients from 39 skin cancer centers from Germany, Austria and Switzerland were analysed. The vast majority received anti PD-1 therapies (n = 1003). Twelve-month RFS for anti PD-1 and BRAF + MEK inhibitor-treated patients were 78.1% and 86.5%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.998 [95% CI 1.335-2.991]; p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) in anti PD-1 (95.8%) and BRAF + MEK inhibitor (96.9%) treated patients (p > 0.05) during the median follow-up of 17 months. Data indicates that anti PD-1 treated patients who develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have lower recurrence rates compared to patients with no irAEs (HR 0.578 [95% CI 0.443-0.754], p = 0.001). BRAF mutation status did not affect overall efficacy of anti PD-1 treatment (p > 0.05). In both, anti PD-1 and BRAF + MEK inhibitor treated cohorts, data did not show any difference in 12-month RFS and 12-month OS comparing patients receiving total lymph node dissection (TLND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy only (p > 0.05). The recurrence prediction model reached high specificity but only low sensitivity with an AUC = 0.65. No new safety signals were detected. Overall, recorded numbers and severity of adverse events were lower than reported in pivotal phase III trials. CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent advances in adjuvant melanoma treatment, early recurrence remains a significant clinical challenge. This study shows that TLND does not reduce the risk of early melanoma recurrence and should only be considered in selected patients. Data further highlight that variables collected during clinical routine are unlikely to allow for a clinically relevant prediction of individual recurrence risk.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Austria , Switzerland , Retrospective Studies , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Melanoma/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases/therapeutic use , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
5.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 2022 Apr 08.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35395693

ABSTRACT

The number of reported cases of syphilis has been increasing for years. The sexually transmitted disease is caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum and progresses in different stages. Symptoms in the ENT area can occur in all stages. This means that a syphilis infection should always be considered by the ENT doctor as a differential diagnosis if the symptoms are suitable. Thus, with increasing oral sexual intercourse, the primary effect/hard chancre is more often observed in the oral cavity. In addition, symptoms can occur not only in the oral cavity, but also in the ear, nose, larynx, cervical and facial regions. The diagnosis is confirmed by direct pathogen detection or by serological detection. The spirochete cannot be cultivated. The therapeutic gold standard is the administration of benzathine penicillin G or procaine penicillin G. Doxycycline, macrolides or ceftriaxone are available as alternatives. In case of inner ear or cranial nerve involvement, the additional administration of a glucocorticoid is recommended. Before antibiotic therapy is administered, the patient must be informed about the possibility of a Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction. In cases of a syphilis infection, a collegial cooperation with the venereologists is always recommended so that an effective and comprehensive diagnosis and therapy can be carried out.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...