Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 58(2): 168-173.e3, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29366696

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the reasons for, benefits of, and barriers to pursuing the American Academy of HIV Medicine (AAHIVM) HIV Pharmacist (AAHIVP) credential. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using an electronic self-administered survey was used. Two separate invitations to participate in online surveys were sent to pharmacists who practice in HIV-related settings: 1 to pharmacists with the AAHIVP credential and 1 to members of key pharmacy organizations and employers without the credential. The surveys assessed demographics, concurrent credentials and certifications, and factors influencing the pursuit of and benefits gained from having the AAHIVP credential (credentialed population) or barriers to pursuing the AAHIVP credential (credentialed and noncredentialed populations). RESULTS: There were 192 participants (survey response rate 38.8%) in the credentialed population and 212 participants in the noncredentialed population. Perceived recognition as an HIV expert from pharmacist (n = 174; 90.6%) and physician (n = 162; 84.4%) peers was the main reason for credentialing; only 20.4% (n = 23/113) of participants' employers reimbursed for the credential. Common reasons for nonpursuit included lack of employer incentive (n = 46; 26.6%) and lack of fee reimbursement (n = 38; 21.9%) in those aware of the credential. However, a majority of these noncredentialed participants reported they would be interested in pursuing credentialing (n = 152; 80.4%). CONCLUSION: AAHIVP credentialing is sought and maintained on the basis of perceived intangible benefits, such as peer recognition, over tangible benefits, such as increased salary and reimbursement by third-party payers. Despite interest, a lack of employer reimbursement is perceived to be a barrier to AAHIVP credentialing among those who have not yet been credentialed.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Credentialing/statistics & numerical data , HIV/drug effects , Pharmaceutical Services/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Certification/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perception , Pharmacies/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Ann Pharmacother ; 48(4): 470-5, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24473489

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transmitted drug resistance (TDR) can limit effective treatment options to antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected persons and increase the risk of treatment failure. Limited estimates of TDR have been reported from the South Central United States. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of TDR in Oklahoma and to examine whether TDR rates have increased with time. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of antiretroviral-naive patients at the Infectious Diseases Institute, a large infectious diseases clinic in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, who had received baseline antiretroviral resistance testing. Mutations were screened using the 2011 International Antiviral Society-USA Drug Resistance Mutation (DRM) update, and categorized using the 2009 World Health Organization (WHO) Surveillance Drug Resistance Mutation (SDRM) list. RESULTS: Genotypic sequences from 428 patients revealed a 6.0% to 13.6% incidence of SDRMs between 2007 and 2011, though no progression in the frequency was apparent during the study period. Primary DRMs were detected in 12.6% of the sampled patients, most commonly involving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs; 8.2%), followed by protease inhibitors (PIs; 3.5%) and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs; 3.3%). The K103N/S and E138A reverse transcriptase mutations were the most common DRMs identified, both present in 3.5% of patients. The L90M mutation was the most frequently observed PI SDRM (1.6%), while the T215C/D/I mutation was the most common NRTI SDRM identified (1.9%). This study was limited by the fact that the WHO SDRM list was last updated in 2009. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of DRMs in central and western Oklahoma is similar to recently reported rates in the United States which lack data from this region. However, the frequency of second-generation NNRTI DRMs (4.4%) suggests the need to closely monitor epidemiologic trends for increasing resistance rates to individual classes of ARVs in order to predict the impact of TDR on therapeutic options.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV-1/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Genotype , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/transmission , HIV Infections/virology , HIV Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , HIV-1/genetics , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Oklahoma/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...