Budget impact analysis of introducing a non-reconstituted, hexavalent vaccine for pediatric immunization in the United Kingdom.

Objectives: Non-reconstituted, hexavalent vaccines (HV-NRs) can facilitate clinical practice by shortening vaccine preparation and administration time and by reducing the risk of vaccination errors compared to combination vaccines requiring reconstitution. The aim of this study was to determine the budget impact of introducing an HV-NR into the United Kingdom's (UK) pediatric immunization program, which currently uses a hexavalent vaccine requiring reconstitution (HV-R). Methods: Abudget impact model covering a 10-year time horizon was developed. The target population constituted closed UK birth cohorts from 2020 to 2029. Total direct costs from the payer's perspective consisted of four main categories: vaccine acquisition and management, healthcare provider's service provision, (non-)contaminated needle-stick and sharps injury (NSI), and non-NSI vaccination error costs. The net budget impact was calculated by comparing the costs in two different market share scenarios. Results: The use of HV-NR instead of HV-R was estimated to save £9,079,927 over a 10-year time horizon (i.e. £907,993 per year). Assuming all other vaccine criteria are equivalent the budget impact was most sensitive to changes in time spent by the healthcare provider and management costs. Conclusion: Results suggest, introducing an HV-NR into the UK's pediatric immunization program is potentially cost saving for the healthcare system.

Biologic treatment sequences for plaque psoriasis: a cost-utility analysis based on 10 years of Dutch real-world evidence from BioCAPTURE.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with biologics may be indicated for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, but comparative evidence on cost-effectiveness is limited. Switching of biologics is common, but it is unclear what the effect is of differences in sequences of biologics. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different biologic treatment sequences for psoriasis based on real-world evidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A sequence model was developed to evaluate the costs and health effects of three consecutive lines of biologic treatments [for example adalimumab-etanercept-ustekinumab (Ada-Eta-Ust) vs. Eta-Ust-Ada] over a 10-year time horizon in the Netherlands. The model was populated with data from the Dutch BioCAPTURE registry and scientific literature. Analyses were conducted of cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and uncertainty was addressed by probabilistic as well as scenario analyses. RESULTS: Treatment of psoriasis with biologics for a 10-year period was estimated to be associated with a cost of €141 962 to €148 442 per patient depending on the treatment sequence used. Cumulative health effects ranged from 7·79 to 8·03 QALYs. Starting with Ada or Ust seems favourable concerning cost and utilities compared with strategies starting with Eta, although credible intervals were partly overlapping. CONCLUSIONS: The order in which biologics are used influences treatment cost-effectiveness, both in terms of costs and health effects. Initiation of a biologic treatment sequence for psoriasis might best be done with Ada or Ust; Eta seems less optimal from a health-economic perspective.