Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(9)2022 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36140450

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: At diagnosis, multiplemyeloma risk estimation includes disease burden, end-organ damage, and biomarkers, with increasing emphasis on genetic abnormalities. Multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) is not always considered in risk estimation. We demonstrate associations found between genetic abnormalities and antigen expression of plasma cells measured by MFC. (2) Methods: Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray (SNP-A) karyotyping as well as MFC using standardized next-generation flow (NGF) panels and instrument settings were performed from bone marrow aspirates at the time of diagnosis. (3) Results: We uncovered specific immunophenotype features related to different genetic risk factors. Specifically, we found higher malignant/normal plasma cell ratio and lower expression of CD27, CD38, CD45, CD56, CD117 and CD138 in higher-risk genetic groups or risk categories.

2.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 43(3): 403-408, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33185981

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with malignant plasma cells (MMPCs) in their bone marrow (BM) and malignant circulating plasma cells (MMCPCs) in the peripheral blood (PB) are an independent marker of a clinically aggressive disease, and it reflects a poor prognosis defined by a short time to progression and overall survival. We hypothesized that changes in ADM expression on BM MMPCs might contribute to MMCPC presence in the PB of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. METHODS: We assessed the difference in expression of adhesion molecules and receptors related to cell-cell interaction: integrins, hyaluronic acid receptors, chemokine receptors and other proteins on healthy donor PCs, RRMM BM and PB MMPCs. RESULTS: Adhesion immunophenotype showed a significant loss of many adhesion molecules when comparing BM MMPCs of MMCPC- and MMCPC+ MM patients (CD49d, CD49e, CD56, CD138). Further decrease of adhesion molecules was shown in MMCPCs (CD49d, CD49e, CD56, CD138, CD58), suggesting that loss of these molecules may allow cells to leave the BM. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of adhesion molecule expression enables MMPCs to leave the BM milieu and enter the PB. These changes can be seen in both the PB and BM of MMCPC+ MM patient.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow/pathology , Cell Adhesion Molecules/analysis , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/pathology , Plasma Cells/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antigens, CD/analysis , Female , Humans , Immunophenotyping , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/blood , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...