Gallbladder Imaging Interpretation Pearls and Pitfalls: Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

The gallbladder is a source of common disease processes with a wide variety of presentations. Common pathologies include acute or chronic cholecystitis, adenomyomatosis, cancer, polyps, and postoperative complications. Accurate imaging assessment of the gallbladder can be very challenging and fraught with potential pitfalls. Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice for the initial evaluation of patients who present with right upper quadrant pain. CT is often used as part of a broader evaluation of patient's abdominal pain if nongallbladder pathologies are also suspected. MRI/MRCP is typically reserved for problem-solving and evaluating patients who present with cholestatic presentation. We discuss common pitfalls, diagnostic challenges, and problem-solving approaches to the imaging evaluation of common gallbladder patho logies.

Incidental Adrenal Nodules in Patients Without Known Malignancy: Prevalence of Malignancy and Utility of Washout CT for Characterization-A Multiinstitutional Study.

BACKGROUND. Washout CT is commonly used to evaluate indeterminate adrenal nodules, although its diagnostic performance is poorly established in true adrenal incidentalomas. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare, in patients without a known malignancy history, the prevalence of malignancy for incidental adrenal nodules with unenhanced attenuation more than 10 HU that do and do not show absolute washout of 60% or more, thereby determining the diagnostic performance of washout CT for differentiating benign from malignant incidental adrenal nodules. METHODS. This retrospective six-institution study included 299 patients (mean age, 57.3 years; 180 women, 119 men) without known malignancy or suspicion for functioning adrenal tumor who underwent washout CT, which showed a total of 336 adrenal nodules with a short-axis diameter of 1 cm or more, homogeneity, and unenhanced attenuation over 10 HU. The date of the first CT ranged across institutions from November 1, 2003, to January 1, 2017. Washout was determined for all nodules. Reference standard was pathology (n = 54), imaging follow-up (≥ 1 year) (n = 269), or clinical follow-up (≥ 5 years) (n = 13). RESULTS. Prevalence of malignancy among all nodules, nodules less than 4 cm, and nodules 4 cm or more was 1.5% (5/336; 95% CI, 0.5-3.4%), 0.3% (1/317; 95% CI, 0.0-1.7%), and 21.1% (4/19; 95% CI, 6.1-45.6%), respectively. Prevalence of malignancy was not significantly different for nodules smaller than 4 cm with (0% [0/241]; 95% CI, 0.0-1.2%) and without (1.3% [1/76]; 95% CI, 0.0-7.1%) washout of 60% or more (p = .08) or for nodules 4 cm or larger with (16.7% [1/6]; 95% CI, 0.4-64.1%) and without (23.1% [3/13]; 95% CI, 5.0-53.8%) washout of 60% or more (p = .75). Washout of 60% or more was observed in 75.5% (243/322; 95% CI, 70.4-80.1%) of benign nodules (excluding pheochromocytomas), 20.0% (1/5; 95% CI, 0.5-71.6%) of malignant nodules, and 33.3% (3/9; 95% CI, 7.5-70.1%) of pheochromocytomas. For differentiating benign nodules from malignant nodules and pheochromocytomas, washout of 60% or more had 77.5% sensitivity, 70.0% specificity, 98.8% PPV, and 9.2% NPV among nodules smaller than 4 cm. CONCLUSION. Prevalence of malignancy is low among incidental homogeneous adrenal nodules smaller than 4 cm with unenhanced attenuation more than 10 HU and does not significantly differ between those with and without washout of 60% or more; wash-out of 60% or more has suboptimal performance for characterizing nodules as benign. CLINICAL IMPACT. Washout CT has limited utility in evaluating incidental adrenal nodules in patients without known malignancy.

Gastrointestinal bleeding: imaging and interventions in cancer patients.

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) among cancer patients is a major source of morbidity and mortality. Although a wide variety of etiologies contribute to GIB, special considerations should be made for cancer-related factors such as the type of malignancy, location and extent of disease, hemostatic parameters, and treatment effects. Key imaging modalities used to evaluate GIB include computed tomography angiography (CTA), radionuclide imaging, and catheter-based angiography. Understanding the cancer and treatment history and recognizing the associated imaging manifestations are important for identifying the source and potential causes of GIB in cancer patients. This article will review the common clinical presentations, causes, imaging manifestations, and angiographic management of GIB in cancer patients.

Oncologic Imaging of the Lymphatic System: Current Perspective with Multi-Modality Imaging and New Horizon.

The lymphatic system is an anatomically complex vascular network that is responsible for interstitial fluid homeostasis, transport of large interstitial particles and cells, immunity, and lipid absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. This network of specially adapted vessels and lymphoid tissue provides a major pathway for metastatic spread. Many malignancies produce vascular endothelial factors that induce tumoral and peritumoral lymphangiogenesis, increasing the likelihood for lymphatic spread. Radiologic evaluation for disease staging is the cornerstone of oncologic patient treatment and management. Multiple imaging modalities are available to access both local and distant metastasis. In this manuscript, we review the anatomy, physiology, and imaging of the lymphatic system.