Differential cortical and subcortical visual processing with eyes shut.

Closing our eyes largely shuts down our ability to see. That said, our eyelids still pass some light, allowing our visual system to coarsely process information about visual scenes, such as changes in luminance. However, the specific impact of eye closure on processing within the early visual system remains largely unknown. To understand how visual processing is modulated when eyes are shut, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure responses to a flickering visual stimulus at high (100%) and low (10%) temporal contrasts, while participants viewed the stimuli with their eyes open or closed. Interestingly, we discovered that eye closure produced a qualitatively distinct pattern of effects across the visual thalamus and visual cortex. We found that with eyes open, low temporal contrast stimuli produced smaller responses across the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), primary (V1) and extrastriate visual cortex (V2). However, with eyes closed, we discovered that the LGN and V1 maintained similar blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses as the eyes open condition, despite the suppressed visual input through the eyelid. In contrast, V2 and V3 had strongly attenuated BOLD response when eyes were closed, regardless of temporal contrast. Our findings reveal a qualitatively distinct pattern of visual processing when the eyes are closed-one that is not simply an overall attenuation but rather reflects distinct responses across visual thalamocortical networks, wherein the earliest stages of processing preserve information about stimuli but are then gated off downstream in visual cortex.NEW & NOTEWORTHY When we close our eyes coarse luminance information is still accessible by the visual system. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined whether eyelid closure plays a unique role in visual processing. We discovered that while the LGN and V1 show equivalent responses when the eyes are open or closed, extrastriate cortex exhibited attenuated responses with eye closure. This suggests that when the eyes are closed, downstream visual processing is blind to this information.

Attention preserves the selectivity of feature-tuned normalization.

Attention and divisive normalization both contribute to making visual processing more efficient. Attention selectively increases the neural gain of relevant information in the early visual cortex, resulting in stronger perceived salience for attended regions or features. Divisive normalization improves processing efficiency by suppressing responses to homogeneous inputs and highlighting salient boundaries, facilitating sparse coding of inputs. Theoretical and empirical research suggest a tight link between attention and normalization, wherein attending to a stimulus results in a release from normalization, thereby allowing for an increase in neural response gain. In the present study, we address whether attention alters the qualitative properties of normalization. Specifically, we examine how attention influences the feature-tuned nature of normalization, whereby suppression is stronger between visual stimuli whose orientation contents are similar, and weaker when the orientations are different. Ten human observers viewed stimuli that varied in orientation content while we acquired fMRI BOLD responses under two attentional states: attending toward or attending away from the stimulus. Our results indicate that attention does not alter the specificity of feature-tuned normalization. Instead, attention seems to enhance visuocortical responses evenly, regardless of the degree of orientation similarity within the stimulus. Since visuocortical responses exhibit adaptation to statistical regularities in natural scenes, we conclude that while attention can selectively increase the gain of responses to attended items, it does not appear to alter the ecologically relevant correspondence between orientation differences and strength of tuned normalization.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The magnitude of visuocortical BOLD responses scales with orientation differences in visual stimuli, with the strongest response suppression for collinear stimuli and least suppression for orthogonal, in a way that appears to match natural scene statistics. We examined the effects of attention on this feature-tuned property of suppression and found that while attending to a stimulus increases the overall gain of visuocortical responses, the qualitative properties of feature-tuning remain unchanged, suggesting attention preserves tuned normalization properties.

Differential cortical and subcortical visual processing with eyes shut.

Closing our eyes largely shuts down our ability to see. That said, our eyelids still pass some light, allowing our visual system to coarsely process information about visual scenes, such as changes in luminance. However, the specific impact of eye closure on processing within the early visual system remains largely unknown. To understand how visual processing is modulated when eyes are shut, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure responses to a flickering visual stimulus at high (100%) and low (10%) temporal contrasts, while participants viewed the stimuli with their eyes open or closed. Interestingly, we discovered that eye closure produced a qualitatively distinct pattern of effects across the visual thalamus and visual cortex. We found that with eyes open, low temporal contrast stimuli produced smaller responses, across the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), primary (V1) and extrastriate visual cortex (V2). However, with eyes closed, we discovered that the LGN and V1 maintained similar BOLD responses as the eyes open condition, despite the suppressed visual input through the eyelid. In contrast, V2 and V3 had strongly attenuated BOLD response when eyes were closed, regardless of temporal contrast. Our findings reveal a qualitative distinct pattern of visual processing when the eyes are closed - one that is not simply an overall attenuation, but rather reflects distinct responses across visual thalamocortical networks, wherein the earliest stages of processing preserves information about stimuli but is then gated off downstream in visual cortex.

Arousal-based pupil modulation is dictated by luminance.

Pupillometry has become a standard measure for assessing arousal state. However, environmental factors such as luminance, a primary dictator of pupillary responses, often vary across studies. To what degree does luminance interact with arousal-driven pupillary changes? Here, we parametrically assessed luminance-driven pupillary responses across a wide-range of luminances, while concurrently manipulating cognitive arousal using auditory math problems of varying difficulty. At the group-level, our results revealed that the modulatory effect of cognitive arousal on pupil size interacts multiplicatively with luminance, with the largest effects occurring at low and mid-luminances. However, at the level of individuals, there were qualitatively distinct individual differences in the modulatory effect of cognitive arousal on luminance-driven pupillary responses. Our findings suggest that pupillometry as a measure for assessing arousal requires more careful consideration: there are ranges of luminance levels that are more ideal in observing pupillary differences between arousal conditions than others.

The specificity of orientation-tuned normalization within human early visual cortex.

Normalization within visual cortex is modulated by contextual influences; stimuli sharing similar features suppress each other more than dissimilar stimuli. This feature-tuned component of suppression depends on multiple factors, including the orientation content of stimuli. Indeed, pairs of stimuli arranged in a center-surround configuration attenuate each other's response to a greater degree when oriented collinearly than when oriented orthogonally. Although numerous studies have examined the nature of surround suppression at these two extremes, far less is known about how the strength of tuned normalization varies as a function of continuous changes in orientation similarity, particularly in humans. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the bandwidth of orientation-tuned suppression within human visual cortex. Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses were acquired as participants viewed a full-field circular stimulus composed of wedges of orientation-bandpass filtered noise. This stimulus configuration allowed us to parametrically vary orientation differences between neighboring wedges in gradual steps between collinear and orthogonal. We found the greatest suppression for collinearly arranged stimuli with a gradual increase in BOLD response as the orientation content became more dissimilar. We quantified the tuning width of orientation-tuned suppression, finding that the voxel-wise bandwidth of orientation tuned normalization was between 20° and 30°, and did not differ substantially between early visual areas. Voxel-wise analyses revealed that suppression width covaried with retinotopic preference, with the tightest bandwidths at outer eccentricities. Having an estimate of orientation-tuned suppression bandwidth can serve to constrain models of tuned normalization, establishing the precise degree to which suppression strength depends on similarity between visual stimulus components.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Neurons in the early visual cortex are subject to divisive normalization, but the feature-tuning aspect of this computation remains understudied, particularly in humans. We investigated orientation tuning of normalization in human early visual cortex using fMRI and estimated the bandwidth of the tuned normalization function across observers. Our findings provide a characterization of tuned normalization in early visual cortex that could help constrain models of divisive normalization in vision.

Grouping by feature of cross-modal flankers in temporal ventriloquism.

Signals in one sensory modality can influence perception of another, for example the bias of visual timing by audition: temporal ventriloquism. Strong accounts of temporal ventriloquism hold that the sensory representation of visual signal timing changes to that of the nearby sound. Alternatively, underlying sensory representations do not change. Rather, perceptual grouping processes based on spatial, temporal, and featural information produce best-estimates of global event properties. In support of this interpretation, when feature-based perceptual grouping conflicts with temporal information-based in scenarios that reveal temporal ventriloquism, the effect is abolished. However, previous demonstrations of this disruption used long-range visual apparent-motion stimuli. We investigated whether similar manipulations of feature grouping could also disrupt the classical temporal ventriloquism demonstration, which occurs over a short temporal range. We estimated the precision of participants' reports of which of two visual bars occurred first. The bars were accompanied by different cross-modal signals that onset synchronously or asynchronously with each bar. Participants' performance improved with asynchronous presentation relative to synchronous - temporal ventriloquism - however, unlike the long-range apparent motion paradigm, this was unaffected by different combinations of cross-modal feature, suggesting that featural similarity of cross-modal signals may not modulate cross-modal temporal influences in short time scales.