Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Promotion , Musculoskeletal Diseases/economics , Early Diagnosis , Humans , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnosis , Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , Musculoskeletal Diseases/therapy , Patient Education as Topic , United States , World Health OrganizationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To develop a comprehensive set of explicit process measures to assess the quality of health care for osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and analgesics use. METHODS: Potential quality measures and a summary of existing data to support or refute the relationship between the processes of care proposed in the indicators and relevant clinical outcomes were developed through a comprehensive literature review. The proposed measures and literature summary were presented to a multidisciplinary panel of experts in arthritis and pain. Using a modification of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, the panel rated each proposed measure for its validity as a measure of health care quality. RESULTS: Among 66 proposed indicators, the expert panel rated 51 as valid measures of health care including 14 for osteoarthritis, 27 for rheumatoid arthritis, and 10 for analgesics use. CONCLUSIONS: Sufficient scientific evidence and expert consensus exist to support a comprehensive set of measures to assess the quality of heath care for osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and analgesics use. These measures can be used to gain an understanding of the quality of care for patients with arthritis.
Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Rheumatology/standards , Foundations , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fludarabine, a purine antimetabolite with potent immunosuppressive properties, has previously been associated with the development of transfusion-associated GVHD (TA-GVHD) in patients with hematologic malignancies. Its role as a risk factor for TA-GVHD in patients without underlying leukemia or lymphoma is uncertain. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 42-year-old female with refractory lupus nephritis received three monthly cycles of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day on Days 1-3) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2 on Day 1). Three months after the last dose of fludarabine, she received 2 units of packed RBCs and 6 units of pooled random platelets, none of which were irradiated. Two weeks later, fever, rash, aminotransferase elevations, hyperbilirubinemia, and pancytopenia developed. RESULTS: Marrow biopsy showed severe aplasia and skin biopsy was consistent with GVHD. Allele-level HLA typing on circulating lymphocytes revealed extra HLA alleles not present in her pretreatment sample, but identical to the HLA haplotypes of an unrelated platelet donor. Treatment with antithymocyte globulin, cyclosporine, and prednisone was followed by preparatory conditioning for a PBPC transplant from an HLA-identical sibling, but the patient died of disseminated candidiasis before transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Fludarabine and other purine analogs are increasingly used in the treatment of disorders other than hematologic malignancy, such as autoimmune disease. The occurence of TA-GVHD after fludarabine therapy in a patient with lupus strongly suggests that this drug is sufficiently immunoablative to be an independent risk factor for TA-GVHD. Irradiation of blood components should be considered in all patients who receive fludarabine therapy.
