Patient profiles and success rates under different sedation techniques in a tertiary care center.

OBJECTIVES: Sedation is commonly utilized for individuals otherwise unable to receive dental treatment, such as those with disabilities, medically complex conditions, and dentophobics. The aim was to characterize the profiles of patients receiving various types of sedation and assess the corresponding success rates. METHOD AND MATERIALS: This was a 5-year records-based retrospective study. Data regarding the indication for sedation, medical history, sedation type, and treatments performed were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 103 patients underwent 389 treatment sessions under sedation; 42.7% of the patients were disabled. The most commonly administered sedation was moderate sedation, (49.4%), followed by deep (36.8%) and inhaled sedation (13.9%). Successful treatment results were achieved in 96.1% of sessions, with no adverse effects noted during recovery. The high success rates were independent of patient age, sex, and sedation type. There was a positive association between the indication for sedation and the type of sedation. The medically complex patients and the dentophobic patients received mainly moderate sedation (85.3% and 58.2%, respectively), whereas the disabled patients received deep sedation (51.2%). In total, 94% of patients were returning (re-visiting) patients. A statistically significant association was found between the type of sedation administered and the success rate during the first and last sessions (P < .001). The success rate at the first session may be predictive of the success in subsequent sessions. CONCLUSION: A significant positive correlation was found between patient characteristics and the chosen sedation type leading to a high success rate across the various sedation modalities.

Inhalation Sedation During the COVID-19 Outbreak: An Expert Opinion.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the pathogen that causes coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), is thought to be transmitted via droplets and aerosols, and was detected in saliva of infected individuals. These droplets from the upper airway may infect the inhalation sedation mask and tubing. The authors determined the adequate measures needed to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 by nitrous-oxide (N2O) system during inhalation sedation in dentistry and provided evidence on mask and tubing sterilization. Additional measures to protect patients and healthcare workers from COVID-19 that may be transmitted by the inhalation sedation system are discussed. The authors recommend minimal use of a N2O system during inhalation sedation in dentistry. In case of need, the practitioners should have more than one scavenger kit and nasal masks for each N2O/O2 mixer. Biologic barriers should be mounted between the scavenger's tubing and the central evacuation system. Strict cleansing and sterilization should be performed for all parts of the N2O system. The use a disposable scavenger system and nasal mask should be considered as a viable option.

The impact of chronic orofacial pain on daily life: the vulnerable patient and disruptive pain.

OBJECTIVE: To identify patient and pain characteristics associated with negative impacts on daily life among patients with chronic orofacial pain (COFP). STUDY DESIGN: Medical records of 200 COFP patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Diagnostic categories included temporomandibular disorders (85; 42.7%), headaches (47; 23.6%), neuropathic pain (37; 18.5%), trigeminal neuralgia (16; 8.0%), and painful posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PTTN) (14; 7.0%). Of these, 47 (23.7%) had medical and 13 (6.5%) had psychiatric comorbidities and 71 (35.7%) experienced physical trauma. Seven (5%) had stopped working, and mean days absent from work was 3.3 ± 19.3. Patients were previously treated by 2.7 ± 1.4 caregivers. Mean scores on a 0-10 scale were as follows: pain (7.13 ± 2.3), sleep quality (6.6 ± 2.4), and quality of life (5.58 ± 3.1). PTTN patients were more likely to quit work (P = .009) and had more days absent from work (mean 24.3; P = .009). We identified patient and pain profiles that predict these poor outcomes. The "vulnerable patient" profile includes health and psychiatric comorbidities and trauma history, particularly PTTN. The "disruptive pain" profile includes severe, continuous, burning, electrical pain accompanied by systemic signs. These profiles intersect in a complex manner, creating a complex feedback loop. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary team approach is recommended to manage COFP patients, in order to improve treatment outcomes and avert more serious consequences.