Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Br J Surg ; 100(6): 735-42, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23436683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain remains a frequent complication after Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. As a consequence, mesh fixation using glue instead of sutures has become popular. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify which fixation technique is to be preferred for elective Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Articles published between January 1990 and April 2012 were searched for in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glue and sutured mesh fixation in elective Lichtenstein repair for unilateral inguinal hernia were included. The quality of the RCTs and the potential risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Of 254 papers found in the initial search, a meta-analysis was conducted of seven RCTs comprising 1185 patients. With the use of glue mesh fixation, the duration of operation was shorter (mean difference -2·57 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) -4·88 to -0·26) min; P = 0·03), patients had lower visual analogue scores for postoperative pain (mean difference -0·75 (-1·18 to -0·33); P = 0·001), early chronic pain occurred less often (risk ratio 0·52, 95 per cent c.i. 0·31 to 0·87; P = 0·01), and time to return to daily activities was shorter (mean difference -1·17 (-2·30 to -0·03) days; P = 0·04). The hernia recurrence rate did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Elective Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia using glue mesh fixation compared with sutures is faster and less painful, with comparable hernia recurrence rates.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Surgical Mesh , Suture Techniques , Tissue Adhesives/therapeutic use , Aged , Chronic Pain/etiology , Chronic Pain/prevention & control , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recovery of Function
2.
Hernia ; 17(1): 89-94, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22903650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Complications after thoracic surgery have well been established, pain being the most prominent. Intercostal nerves are mixed type nerves combining motor and sensory functions. This notion is not consistent with the incidence of PTPS compared to the incidence of muscle paresis or paralysis. We would hypothesize that abdominal wall paresis or paralysis is underdiagnosed. METHODS: In our hospital, three patients developed abdominal wall paralysis after thoracic surgery and consequent nerve damage. Their cases are discussed, and a review of the literature was conducted concerning (intercostal) nerve damage on a cellular level, the anatomy of the intercostal nerve, prevention of intercostal nerve damage and surgical techniques. RESULTS: A cellular cascade known as Wallerian degeneration and regeneration determine whether a damaged nerve can function again. The recovery of the nerve is highly dependent on the correct function of activated Schwann cells and macrophages and is related to the amount of damage that has taken place. The anatomy of the intercostal nerve makes it susceptible to injury. Retractor placement during open thoracic surgery has shown to effect compression injury and induced mechanical deformation and damage. Given the known factors of pathophysiology and anatomy, a number of preventive measures have been tested to reduce intercostal nerve damage. Several techniques have been proposed, but the most used technique, the video-assisted thoracic surgery, has been the most effective in reducing nerve damage. CONCLUSION: Abdominal wall paralysis is an underdiagnosed complication after thoracic surgery. The amount of stress on the intercostal nerves could be reduced with less invasive techniques such as the VATS technique.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall/physiopathology , Intercostal Nerves/injuries , Paralysis/etiology , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/complications , Thoracotomy/adverse effects , Abdominal Wall/innervation , Humans , Hypesthesia/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/etiology , Rectus Abdominis/innervation , Rectus Abdominis/physiopathology
3.
Br J Surg ; 100(2): 209-16, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23034741

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Open cholecystectomy (OC) is often preferred over laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension, but evidence is lacking to support this practice. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify which surgical technique is preferable for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Articles published between January 1990 and October 2011 were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of OC versus LC for cholecystolithiasis in patients with liver cirrhosis were included. The quality of the RCTs was assessed using the Jadad criteria. RESULTS: Following review of 1422 papers by title and abstract, a meta-analysis was conducted of four RCTs comprising 234 surgical patients. They provided evidence of at least level 2b on the Oxford Level of Evidence Scale, but scored poorly according to the Jadad criteria. Some 97·0 per cent of the patients had Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) grade A or B liver cirrhosis. In all, 96·6 per cent underwent elective surgery. No postoperative deaths were reported. LC was associated with fewer postoperative complications (risk ratio 0·52, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0·29 to 0·92; P = 0·03), a shorter hospital stay (mean difference -3·05 (95 per cent c.i. -4·09 to -2·01) days; P < 0·001) and quicker resumption of a normal diet (mean difference -27·48 (-30·96 to -23·99) h; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Patients with CTP grade A or B liver cirrhosis who undergo LC for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis have fewer overall postoperative complications, a shorter hospital stay and resume a normal diet more quickly than those who undergo OC.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy/methods , Cholecystolithiasis/surgery , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Adult , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Cholecystolithiasis/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment/methods
4.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol ; 26(1): 47-59, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22482525

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to review systematically morbidity and mortality after non-hepatic surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for articles using the words: liver failure, hepatic insufficiency, liver cirrhosis, cirrhosis, cirrhotic, surgical procedures, operative complications, operative mortality, postoperative complications, surgical complication, surgical risk, hernia. RESULTS: Forty-six articles were selected from 5247 included after the initial search. Level of evidence provided in the articles varied greatly. Non-hepatic surgery of patients with cirrhosis resulted in increased postoperative morbidity and mortality compared to similar surgery for non-cirrhotic patients. Cholecystectomy and umbilical and inguinal hernia correction were associated with the lowest increased morbidity and mortality while pancreatic surgery, cardiovascular, and trauma surgery correlated with the highest. The preoperative model for end stage liver disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores appeared to be predictive of postoperative risks. Portal hypertension and surgery in the emergency setting were associated with extra increased mortality and morbidity rates. CONCLUSION: This systematic review of the literature showed that in patients with liver cirrhosis who undergo non-hepatic surgery, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates varied greatly depending on severity of the cirrhosis and the surgical procedure. However, the majority of procedures can be safely performed in patients with low MELD scores or CTP A cirrhosis without portal hypertension.


Subject(s)
Liver Cirrhosis/mortality , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Surgical Procedures, Operative/mortality , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Morbidity , Severity of Illness Index , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...