Getting to the point: developing IT for the sharp end of healthcare.

Healthcare demonstrates the same properties of risk, complexity, uncertainty, dynamic change, and time-pressure as other high hazard sectors including aviation, nuclear power generation, the military, and transportation. Unlike those sectors, healthcare has particular traits that make it unique such as wide variability, ad hoc configuration, evanescence, resource constraints, and governmental and professional regulation. While healthcare's blunt (management) end is more easily understood, the sharp (operator) end is more difficult to research the closer one gets to the sharp end's point. Understanding sharp end practice and cognitive work can improve computer-based systems resilience, which is the ability to perform despite change and challenges. Research into actual practice at the sharp end of healthcare will provide the basis to understand how IT can support clinical practice. That understanding can be used to develop computer-based systems that will act as team players, able to support both individual and distributed cognitive work at healthcare's sharp end.

The effect of sevoflurane and desflurane on upper airway reactivity.

BACKGROUND: Although bronchial reactivity can be assessed by changes in airway resistance, there is no well-accepted measure of upper airway reactivity during anesthesia. The authors used the stimulus of endotracheal tube cuff inflation and deflation to assess changes in airway reactivity in patients anesthetized with sevoflurane and desflurane. METHODS: Sixty-four patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II participated in this randomized, double-blind study. Patients were anesthetized with either sevoflurane or desflurane at 1.0 and 1.8 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). The trachea was stimulated by inflating the endotracheal tube cuff. A blinded observer assessed the severity of patient response to the stimulus and changes in hemodynamic variables. The process was repeated at the second MAC treatment condition. RESULTS: At 1.0 MAC, patients anesthetized with desflurane had a more intense response and a greater likelihood of significant coughing and associated hemodynamic changes (both at P < 0.05). At 1.8 MAC, sevoflurane and desflurane both suppressed clinically significant responses to tracheal stimulation. Interrater reliability was excellent for this measure of upper airway reactivity (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of the cough response to tracheal stimulation by endotracheal tube cuff inflation is a reliable and clinically meaningful measure of upper airway reactivity. At 1.0 MAC, sevoflurane is superior to desflurane for suppressing moderate and severe responses to this stimulus.

Clarification of anesthesia standards and guidelines.

Understanding and complying with the guidelines of the American Society of Anesthesiologists will help ensure high-quality patient care, increase levels of patient safety, and minimize medico-legal risk. The author discusses important standards and guidelines for the administration of general anesthesia and sedation/analgesia in the office-based setting and compares the requirements of the different accrediting organizations. (Aesthetic Surg J 2001;21:573-575.).

Use of electronic mail for postoperative follow-up after ambulatory surgery.

The authors report on a patient who used electronic mail to report satisfactory recovery from ambulatory surgery and anesthesia. The potential benefits and pitfalls of using electronic mail for patient follow-up and communication, as well as research purposes, are reviewed. Potential benefits include cost savings, ease in collecting quality improvement data, and the potential for increased reporting of unpleasant events. Potential pitfalls include lack of universal access (with racial and socioeconomic differentials), privacy and security concerns, and potential slow responses to messages that might require emergent responses or actions.

The effects of subanesthetic concentrations of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide, alone and in combination, on analgesia, mood, and psychomotor performance in healthy volunteers.

UNLABELLED: We studied the effects of subanesthetic concentrations of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide, alone and in combination, on analgesia, mood, and psychomotor performance in human volunteers. We hypothesized that nitrous oxide and sevoflurane would produce both opposing and potentiating effects within the same study. Over the course of three sessions, 20 subjects inhaled 0%, 0.2%, or 0.4% end-tidal sevoflurane for a 68-min period that was divided into four 17-min blocks. During either the second or fourth block, 30% end-tidal nitrous oxide was added to the concentration of sevoflurane being inhaled. Pain response, psychomotor performance, and mood were evaluated during the second and fourth blocks. Pain ratings were higher when sevoflurane and nitrous oxide were administered together than when nitrous oxide was administered alone, which indicates that sevoflurane attenuated the analgesic effects of nitrous oxide. Sevoflurane increased self-reported ratings of sleepiness, and the addition of nitrous oxide decreased these ratings. Nitrous oxide potentiated psychomotor impairment that was induced by sevoflurane. The combination of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide produced both opposing and potentiating effects within the same study. The results suggest that nitrous oxide and sevoflurane may act through different neurochemical mechanisms on some end points, such as analgesia and sleepiness. IMPLICATIONS: Healthy volunteers inhaled subanesthetic concentrations of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide. Sevoflurane made nitrous oxide less effective as an analgesic, and nitrous oxide made sevoflurane less effective as a sedative. The two drugs may work at cross purposes on different end points of anesthesia.

Improving the efficiency of survey research in postoperative patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To increase the contact rate with eligible patients for quality assurance/improvement surveys by modifying survey rounds to accommodate the schedules of individual nursing units. DESIGN: Two-phase, interventional time series study. SETTING: Postoperative inpatients at a university hospital. PATIENTS: 498 adult postoperative inpatients who remained hospitalized during the second postoperative day. INTERVENTIONS: Between the first and second measurement periods, efforts were made to learn the schedule of each nursing unit and to improve the efficiency of survey rounds so that a larger proportion of patients could be contacted. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The contact rate for eligible patients was improved from 66% to 80% (p < 0.01). Improvement during the second period was attributed to fewer patients being away from the nursing unit (20% vs. 12%, p < 0.05) or otherwise occupied by attending physicians on rounds (9% vs. 4%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Strategies individualized to patient care units can improve the efficiency and credibility of inpatient survey research. We describe the strategies most helpful in improving the efficiency of survey rounds at one medical center.

Assessment of satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain.

The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to assess satisfaction with treatment of chronic pain, evaluate the reliability and validity of this instrument, and then examine predictors and consequences of satisfaction. The Pain Service Satisfaction Test (PSST) is the result of this effort. Fifty adult patients receiving services for chronic pain in a university pain clinic completed the PSST as part of a survey mailed to their homes. Findings supporting the validity of the PSST included significant positive correlations with a general measure of treatment satisfaction, patient ratings of global treatment satisfaction and effects of treatment, and physician ratings of patient satisfaction with treatment. Regression analyses of predictors of satisfaction highlighted significant contributions of confidence and trust in the provider, pain reduction, and waiting in the clinic. These predictors together accounted for 60% of satisfaction with treatment. Treatment satisfaction was negatively correlated with depression, reported number of physicians consulted, and number of physician visits for pain in the past 12 months; and there was a trend toward a negative correlation with disability. Results of the present study support the importance of satisfaction with treatment as a predictor and possible determinant of later health, function, and service utilization.

Effects of information on the reinforcing, subjective, and psychomotor effects of nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers.

The purpose of this study was to characterize the reinforcing, subjective, and psychomotor effects of nitrous oxide (N2O) in healthy volunteers who were given different amounts of information regarding the drugs they were being administered in the experiment. A choice procedure was used in which subjects first sampled a placebo and a given concentration of N2O and then chose between the two. N2O concentration varied across the four-session experiment from 10-40%. Besides choice, subjective and psychomotor effects served as dependent measures. In the INFORMED group (n = 11), subjects were told at the beginning of each sampling trial what concentration of N2O they were inhaling or whether they were inhaling 100% oxygen (placebo). They were also informed about the prototypic effects of N2O (e.g. tingling or numbing, euphoria, dysphoria) and oxygen (e.g. no discernible effects). In the NON-INFORMED group (n = 11), subjects were only told at the beginning of each sampling trial that the drugs they would be inhaling came from one of six classes of drugs. Thirty percent N2O was chosen by a significantly higher proportion of subjects than expected by chance in the INFORMED group, but not in the NON-INFORMED group. Further, the probability of choosing 20-40% N2O was higher in the INFORMED group than in the NON-INFORMED group. Subjective effects of N2O were not affected by the information manipulation. Psychomotor performance at the highest N2O concentration tested (40%) was impaired to a greater extent in the NON-INFORMED than in the INFORMED group. We conclude that the reinforcing effects of N2O, and perhaps the impairing effects, can be modulated by telling subjects beforehand that they are inhaling N2O and what effects they might be expected to experience from the drug.

Subjective, psychomotor, cognitive, and analgesic effects of subanesthetic concentrations of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane is a volatile general anesthetic that differs in chemical nature from the gaseous anesthetic nitrous oxide. In a controlled laboratory setting, the authors characterized the subjective, psychomotor, and analgesic effects of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide at two equal minimum alveolar subanesthetic concentrations. METHODS: A crossover design was used to test the effects of two end-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane (0.3% and 0.60%), two end-tidal concentrations of nitrous oxide (15% and 30%) that were equal in minimum alveolar concentration to that of sevoflurane, and placebo (100% oxygen) in 12 healthy volunteers. The volunteers inhaled one of these concentrations of sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, or placebo for 35 min. Dependent measures included subjective, psychomotor, and physiologic effects, and pain ratings measured during a cold-water test. RESULTS: Sevoflurane produced a greater degree of amnesia, psychomotor impairment, and drowsiness than did equal minimum alveolar concentrations of nitrous oxide. Recovery from sevoflurane and nitrous oxide effects was rapid. Nitrous oxide but not sevoflurane had analgesic effects. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane and nitrous oxide produced different profiles of subjective, behavioral, and cognitive effects, with sevoflurane, in general, producing an overall greater magnitude of effect. The differences in effects between sevoflurane and nitrous oxide are consistent with the differences in their chemical nature and putative mechanisms of action.

Analgesic and psychomotor effects of thiopental at subanesthetic concentrations in human volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Studies of the effects of barbiturates on the modulation of pain have produced mixed results. In a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we studied the effects of thiopental at presumed steady-state, "conscious sedation" levels on cold-pressor-induced pain in 12 healthy volunteers. METHODS: Five drug conditions were used, each condition consisting of an injection (either drug or placebo) with a 20-min infusion and a 160-min recovery period. The conditions were placebo (saline), thiopental targeted to three effect-site concentrations, and fentanyl (1.4 micrograms/kg), as a positive control to verify test sensitivity to analgesic drugs. The three thiopental concentrations were modeled (STANPUMP) to achieve effect-site concentrations of 5, 7.5, and 10 micrograms/ml using a bolus and a three-step continuous infusion. Five minutes into the infusion period and 115 min after the infusion period was terminated, subjects immersed their forearms in ice cold water for 3 min while pain and behavioral assessments were recorded. RESULTS: Thiopental at the highest dose produced a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in self-reported pain intensity both at 5 min into the infusion period and at 115 min after termination of the infusion. Fentanyl reduced pain intensity during the first immersion only. Thiopental changed subjects' moods and psychomotor performance in a dose-related fashion. CONCLUSIONS: Our laboratory results do not support the long-held belief that barbiturates are "antanalgesic" or hyperalgesic, at least for cold-pressor-induced pain.

The effects of alcohol history on the reinforcing, subjective and psychomotor effects of nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers.

The purpose of this study was to characterize the reinforcing, subjective and psychomotor effects of nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers with different alcohol histories. Subjects were divided into two groups: light drinkers (n = 9) and moderate drinkers (n = 10). A choice procedure was used in which subjects first sampled placebo and a given concentration of nitrous oxide, and then chose between the two. Nitrous oxide concentration varied across the four-session experiment from 10-40%. Besides choice, subjective and psychomotor effects served as dependent measures. The majority of subjective effects of nitrous oxide, and its psychomotor-impairing effects, did not vary as a function of drinking group. However, a Wilcoxon rank sum test showed that the median number of times moderate drinkers chose nitrous oxide (three) was significantly higher than the median number of times light drinkers chose nitrous oxide (one). This study provides suggestive evidence that the reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide are modulated by alcohol history.

The reinforcing effects of brief exposures to nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers.

The reinforcing and subjective effects of brief (about 1.5 min) exposures to nitrous oxide, ranging from inspired concentrations of 20-80% in oxygen, were examined in 11 healthy volunteers. A choice procedure was used in which during each of four sessions, subjects first sampled a given concentration of nitrous oxide and placebo oxygen, and then chose between the two. 20, 40, 60 and 80% nitrous oxide were chosen by five, four, three, and three subjects, respectively--these choice levels did not exceed that of chance. All concentrations had psychoactive effects, and in general, concentration-related subjective effects were found. We conclude that in a medical setting, nitrous oxide inhaled in a manner similar to that when used recreationally in a naturalistic setting, does not function as a reinforcer across a wide range of concentrations, in subjects with a modest lifetime history of psychoactive drug use.

Midazolam does not influence intravenous fentanyl-induced analgesia in healthy volunteers.

The effects of saline and intravenous midazolam (0.5, 1, and 2 mg per 70 kg) in combination with intravenous fentanyl (0.1 mg/70 kg) were examined on pain induced by a cold pressor test. Healthy volunteers (six females, six males) were enrolled in a prospective, double-blind, randomized, crossover trial in which mood and psychomotor performance were also examined. Five minutes and 135 min postinjection subjects immersed their forearm in ice cold water for 3 min while assessments of pain were recorded. During the first immersion, subjects reported significantly lower pain intensity and bothersomeness ratings after having been injected with fentanyl, relative to the saline condition, but the addition of midazolam neither increased nor decreased pain reports. During the second immersion (approximately 2.5 h postinjection) pain ratings did not differ between the drug and saline conditions. Mood-altering and psychomotor-impairing effects of the drug combination were dose related. We conclude that midazolam at the doses and route of administration tested neither potentiates nor decreases the analgesia produced by fentanyl in a cold-pressor pain assay.

The effects of a cold-water immersion stressor on the reinforcing and subjective effects of fentanyl in healthy volunteers.

The reinforcing and subjective effects of fentanyl, an opioid analgesic, were tested in ten healthy volunteers without histories of drug abuse, as a function of the temperature of a water bath in which the volunteers' forearms were immersed. The temperatures were body-temperature (37 degrees C), moderately cold (10 degrees C), and very cold (2 degrees C). A discrete-trial choice procedure was used in which, in each session, volunteers sampled 50 micrograms of fentanyl (delivered as a bolus via an infusion pump) and saline, and then on three successive trials, chose between the two. Volunteers then had to immerse their non-dominant forearm in the water bath 5 min after a drug delivery. Fentanyl was chosen on 77% of choice occasions in the 10 degrees C and 2 degrees C water conditions, which was significantly different from chance levels, and on 60% of choice occasions in the 37 degrees C water condition, which did not differ from chance levels. Several subjective effects of fentanyl were also modulated by the temperature of the water bath. We conclude that in the context of a painful stimulus, 50 micrograms of fentanyl functions as a reinforcer in non-drug abusers.

Differential acute tolerance development to effects of nitrous oxide in humans.

The analgesic, subjective, and psychomotor effects of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40% nitrous oxide in oxygen were studied in 10 volunteers to determine if acute tolerance developed differentially to these variables. In this prospective, randomized, crossover, double-blind study, volunteers inhaled either placebo (100% oxygen) or one of the aforementioned doses of nitrous oxide for 120 min. During this period, volunteers immersed their non-dominant forearm, for 3 min, in ice-cold water at 25, 70 and 115 min from the onset of the inhalation. At other prescribed time intervals throughout the session, mood and psychomotor performance were assessed. Subjects reported less pain intensity from the cold-water stimulus and reported the pain bothered them less as a function of increasing nitrous oxide dose; in addition, this analgesia was significantly less as the inhalation period progressed (i.e., acute tolerance). Some subjective effects of nitrous oxide that could be considered hedonic in nature (elation, drug liking) also showed evidence of acute tolerance. In contrast, other subjective effects and the psychomotor-impairing effects of nitrous oxide did not change significantly during the inhalation period (i.c., no acute tolerance). The differential acute tolerance observed in this study suggests that different effects of nitrous oxide may be mediated by different neurochemical substrates.

Choice of anesthesia and intraoperative monitoring for lower extremity revascularization.

The prevalence of significant coronary artery disease re-enforces the importance of careful preoperative and intraoperative management in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization. This article presents a practical approach toward the evaluation of anesthetic risk and the proper use of anesthetic agents and monitoring devices to minimize morbidity. The role of general and regional anesthetic agents is discussed, and complications of both techniques are presented.