ABSTRACT
At our department, 46 constrained acetabular components in 38 patients were placed successively for a period of 4 years. Indications included recurrent dislocation, septic and aseptic loosening with extensive bone loss, tumor surgery with extensive bone resection, and instability due to neurologic impairment. Because 2 cup failures and 10 dislocations were observed with the constrained devices at 4 to 7 years of follow-up, the authors started to use large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings for similar indications. A series of 36 such bearings in 38 patients revealed only one cup failure and one dislocation at 2 to 4 years of follow-up. Although the 2 series are different and therefore difficult to compare, the authors recommend judicious use of constrained devices because of the high failure rate (26%) and consideration of alternative options such as the use of large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings.
