Small bowel cancer: single-centre results over a period of 12 years.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Tumors of the small bowel are rare, accounting for about 3-6% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, diagnosis and treatment are difficult and an ongoing challenge. METHODOLOGY: Follow-up and clinical data of 43 patients with small bowel cancer who underwent surgery at our hospital. RESULTS: Subgroups consisted of adenocarcinoma (n=16; 37.2%), neuroendocrine tumors (n=12; 27.9%), gastrointestinal stroma tumor (GIST) (n=10; 23.3%), lymphoma (n=3; 7%) and desmoid tumor (n=2; 4.6%). Tumor localizations were within duodenum (46.5%), jejunum (16.3%) and ileum (37.2%). Thirty patients were curatively operated, 13 for palliative treatment or diagnostic purpose. Adenocarcinoma patients showed preponderance of advanced tumor stages: stage I/II in 5 pts, III/IV in 11 patients. Stage distribution for patients with neuroendocrine tumors was 3 each for I and II and 6 for III. Localization was predominantly within the ileum (n=7). Overall survival after five/ten years was 48/37%. Patients with neuroendocrine tumors showed best survival results (75/57%), GIST patients 60/35% and adenocarcinoma (27% each). There was a strong trend towards better survival at early tumor stages in patients with adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis is essential for prognosis of small bowel malignancies. Cure is unlikely if lymph node or distant metastases have already developed.

Prospective evaluation of diagnostic modalities in suspected acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate different diagnostic modalities routinely employed in a district hospital. METHOD: Four hundred subsequent patients presenting with acute abdominal pain were included over a period of 18 months. Patient characteristics, diagnostic work-up, intraoperative findings, histology and clinical outcome were documented. Rectal temperature, white cell count (WCC), C-reactive protein (CRP), ultrasonography (US) and Ohmann score were analysed with relation to diagnostic value. RESULTS: Negative appendicectomy rate and negative laparotomy rate on the day of admission were 22% and 21%, respectively. Sensitivity was highest for WCC and CRP (0.82 and 0.85) but US showed highest values for specificity (0.92), accuracy (0.85) and odds ratio (13.06). No patient with an Ohmann score below 6.5 suffered from acute appendicitis. With regard to different levels of training in US, experienced surgeons and radiologists had best values for specificity (1.00 and 0.98) and accuracy (0.90 and 0.94). Surprisingly, less-experienced sonographers also achieved good results with regard to specificity (up to 0.96) and positive predictive value (up to 0.89). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis remains insufficient, with an unacceptable high rate of unnecessary operations. Only the promotion of routine ultrasonography might contribute to an improvement in the near future.